全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Sensors  2014 

Dimension Reduction of Multivariable Optical Emission Spectrometer Datasets for Industrial Plasma Processes

DOI: 10.3390/s140100052

Keywords: dimension reduction, OES, plasma etching process, OES output pattern

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A new data dimension-reduction method, called Internal Information Redundancy Reduction (IIRR), is proposed for application to Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES) datasets obtained from industrial plasma processes. For example in a semiconductor manufacturing environment, real-time spectral emission data is potentially very useful for inferring information about critical process parameters such as wafer etch rates, however, the relationship between the spectral sensor data gathered over the duration of an etching process step and the target process output parameters is complex. OES sensor data has high dimensionality (fine wavelength resolution is required in spectral emission measurements in order to capture data on all chemical species involved in plasma reactions) and full spectrum samples are taken at frequent time points, so that dynamic process changes can be captured. To maximise the utility of the gathered dataset, it is essential that information redundancy is minimised, but with the important requirement that the resulting reduced dataset remains in a form that is amenable to direct interpretation of the physical process. To meet this requirement and to achieve a high reduction in dimension with little information loss, the IIRR method proposed in this paper operates directly in the original variable space, identifying peak wavelength emissions and the correlative relationships between them. A new statistic, Mean Determination Ratio (MDR), is proposed to quantify the information loss after dimension reduction and the effectiveness of IIRR is demonstrated using an actual semiconductor manufacturing dataset. As an example of the application of IIRR in process monitoring/control, we also show how etch rates can be accurately predicted from IIRR dimension-reduced spectral data.

References

[1]  International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. Available online: http://www.itrs.net/about.html (accessed on 2 March 2013).
[2]  Cardinaud, C.; Peignon, M.-C.; Tessier, P.-Y. Plasma etching: Principles, mechanisms, application to micro-and nano-technologies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2000, 164, 72–83.
[3]  Edgar, T.F.; Butler, S.W.; Campbell, W.J.; Pfeiffer, C.; Bode, C.; Hwang, S.B.; Balakrishnan, K.S.; Hahn, J. Automatic control in microelectronics manufacturing: Practices, challenges, and possibilities. Automatica 2000, 36, 1567–1603.
[4]  Conde, L. An introduction to Langmuir probe diagnostics of plasmas. Available online: http://plasmalab.aero.upm.es/~lcl/PlasmaProbes/Probes-2010-2.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2013).
[5]  Ilic, D.B. Impedance measurement as a diagnostic for plasma reactors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1981, 52, 1542–1545.
[6]  Song, Y.M.; Chang, K.S.; Na, B.H.; Yu, J.S.; Lee, Y.T. Precise etch-depth control of microlens-integrated intracavity contacted vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers by in-situ laser reflectometry and reflectivity modeling. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 5773–5778.
[7]  Lynn, S.A.; Ringwood, J.; MacGearailt, N. Global and local virtual metrology models for a plasma etch process. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 2012, 25, 94–103.
[8]  Ocean Optics Inc. USB4000 Miniature Fiber Optic Spectrometer. Available online: http://www.oceanoptics.com/Products/usb4000.asp (accessed on 22 November 2012).
[9]  Zeng, D.; Spanos, C.J. Virtual metrology modeling for plasma etch operations. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 2009, 22, 419–431.
[10]  Lynn, S.; Ringwood, J.; Ragnoli, E.; McLoone, S.; MacGearailty, N. Virtual Metrology for Plasma Etch Using Tool Variables. Proceedings of 2009 IEEE Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, Berlin, Germany, 10–12 May 2009; pp. 143–148.
[11]  Yue, H.H.; Qin, S.J.; Wiseman, J.; Toprac, A. Plasma etching endpoint detection using multiple wavelengths for small open-area wafers. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Films 2001, 19, 66–75.
[12]  Westerman, R.; Johnson, D.; Lai, S.; Teixeira, M. Endpoint Detection Methods for Time Division Multiplex Etch Processes. Proceedings of SPIE Micromachining and Microfabrication Process Technology XI, San Jose, CA, USA, 21–26 January 2006.
[13]  Bacelli, G.; Ringwood, J.V. Tracking Plasma Etch Process Variations Using Principal Component Analysis of OES Data. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Information in Control, Automation and Robotics, Angers, France, 9–12 May 2007.
[14]  Kim, M.-W.; Kim, S.-G.; Zhao, S.; Hong, S.J.; Han, S.-S. Endpoint detection in plasma etching using principal component analysis and expanded hidden markov model. ECS Trans. 2011, 34, 943–948.
[15]  Yue, H.H.; Tomoyasu, M. Weighted Principal Component Analysis and Its Applications to Improve FDC Performance. Proceedings of 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlantis, Paradise Island, Bahanmas, 14–17 December 2004; pp. 4262–4267.
[16]  Ma, B.; McLoone, S.; Ringwood, J.; Macgearailt, N. Selecting Signature Optical Emission Spectroscopy Variables Using Sparse Principal Component Analysis. Proceedings of IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh, 24–27 December 2008; pp. 14–19.
[17]  Sharma, D.; Armer, H.; Moyne, J. A Comparison of Data Mining Methods for Yield Modeling, Chamber Matching and Virtual Metrology Applications. Proceedings of IEEE 23rd Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC), Saratoga Springs, NY, USA, 15–17 May 2012; pp. 231–236.
[18]  Mardia, K.V.; Kent, J.T.; Bibby, J.M. Multivariate Analysis (Probability and Mathematical Statistics), 1st ed. ed.; Academic Press: Salt Lake, UT, USA, 1980.
[19]  Luss, R.; d'Aspremont, A. Clustering and feature selection using sparse principal component analysis. Optim. Eng. 2010, 11, 145–157.
[20]  DeMasi, O.; Meza, J.; Bailey, D.H. Dimension reduction using rule ensemble machine learning methods: A numerical study of three ensemble methods. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1108.6094 2011. code: 2011arXiv1108.6094D.
[21]  Tobias, R.D. An Introduction to Partial Least Squares Regression. Proceedings of 20th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 2–5 April 1995; pp. 2–5.
[22]  Lawley, D.N.; Maxwell, A.E. Factor analysis as a statistical method. J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser. D 1962, 12, 209–229.
[23]  Huber, P.J. Projection pursuit. Ann. Stat. 1985, 13, 435–475.
[24]  Stewart, D.W. The application and misapplication of factor analysis in marketing research. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 51–62.
[25]  Carreira-Perpinan, M.A. A Review of Dimension Reduction Techniques. Technical Report CS-96-09; Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield: Sheffield, UK, 1997; pp. 1–69.
[26]  Hong, S.J.; May, G.S.; Park, D.-C. Neural network modeling of reactive ion etching using optical emission spectroscopy data. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 2003, 16, 598–608.
[27]  Tu, J.V. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1996, 49, 1225–1231.
[28]  Lee, J.M.; Qin, S.J.; Lee, I.B. Fault detection and diagnosis based on modified independent component analysis. AIChE J. 2006, 52, 3501–3514.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133