Hull cleaning before repainting is a key operation in the maintenance of ships. For years, a method to improve such operation has been sought by means of the robotization of techniques such as grit blasting and ultra high pressure water jetting. Despite this, it continues to be standard practice in shipyards that this process is carried out manually because the developed robotized systems are too expensive to be widely accepted by shipyards. We have chosen to apply a more conservative and realistic approach to this problem, which has resulted in the development of several solutions that have been designed with different automation and operation range degrees. These solutions are fitted with most of the elements already available in many shipyards, so the installation of additional machinery in the workplace would not be necessary. This paper describes the evolutionary development of sensor systems for the automation of the preparation process of ship hull surfaces before the painting process is performed. Such evolution has given rise to the development of new technologies for coating removal.
References
[1]
Smith, A. Marine coating: The coming future. Prot. Coat. Eur. 1999, 4, 18–20.
[2]
Wayle, A. Trends for European Shipyards. Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Automated Applications, Yohaio, Japan; 1998; pp. 126–130.
[3]
ISO 8501. ISO 8501-1:2007. Preparation of steel substrates before application of paints and related products-visual assessment of surface cleanliness.; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
[4]
Schmidt, R. Evolution of UHP waterjetting equipment: Surface preparation process found to yield higher productivity than grit blasting. Met. Finish 2005, 103, 41–60.
[5]
Goldie, B. Comparing robotic units made to clean vertical surfaces with UHP waterjetting. Prot. Coat. Eur. 1999, 4, 9–18.
[6]
Goldie, B. A comparative look at dry blast units for vertical surfaces. Prot. Coat. Eur. 1999, 5, 12–16.
[7]
Ross, B.; Bares, J.; Fromme, C. A semi-autonomous robot for stripping paint from large vessels. Int. J. Robot. 2003, 22, 617–626.
[8]
Ross, B.; Hoburg, F.; Fromme, C.; Bares, J.; DeLouis, M. Robotic Apparatuses, Systems and Methods. U.S. Patent Application 10/153,942, 2002.
[9]
Yuan, F.; Guo, L.; Meng, Q.; Lui, F. The design of underwater hull-cleaning robot. J. Mar. Sci. Appl. 2004, 3, 41–45.
[10]
Longo, D.; Muscato, G. Natural/Outdoor and Underwater Robots. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference CLAWAR; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 1159–1170.
[11]
Iborra, A.; Pastor, J.A.; Alonso, D.; Alvarez, B.; Ortiz, F.; Navarro, P.J.; Fernández, C.; Suardíaz, J. A cost-effective robotic solution for the cleaning of ships' hulls. Robotica 2009, 28, 453–464.
[12]
Ortiz, F.; Alonso, D.; Pastor, J.A.; álvarez, B.; Iborra, A. A Reference Control Architecture for Service Robots as applied to a Climbing Vehicle. In Bioinspiration and Robotics: Walking and Climbing Robots; Maki, K., Ed.; I-Tech: Vienna, Austria, 2007; p. 544.
Kapur, J.N.; Sahoo, P.K.; Wong, A.K.C. A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 1985, 29, 273–285.
Johannsen, G.; Bille, J. A Threshold Selection Method Using Information Measures. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Munich, Germany, 19–22 October 1982; pp. 140–143.
[17]
Navarro, P.J.; Iborra, A.; Fernández, C.; Sánchez, P.; Suardíaz, J. A sensor system for detection of hull surface defects. Sensors 2010, 10, 7067–7081.
[18]
Ortiz, F.; Pastor, J.A.; álvarez, B.; Iborra, A.; Ortega, N.; Rodríguez, D.; Conesa, C. Robots for Hull Ship Clearing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Vigo, Spain, 4–7 June 2007.
[19]
Fernández-Isla, C.; Navarro, P.J.; Alcover, P.M. Automated visual inspection of ship hull surfaces using the wavelet transform. Math. Problems Eng. 2013, 2013, 101837:1–101837:12.
[20]
Mallat, S. Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models. IEEE Trans. Acous. Speech Sig. Proc. 1989, 37, 2091–2110.
[21]
Truchetet, F.; Laligant, O. A review on industrial applications of wavelet and multiresolution based signal-image processing. J. Electron. Imaging 2008, 17, 3–11.
[22]
Han, Y.; Shi, P. An adaptive level-selecting wavelet transform for texture defect detection. Image Vision Comput. 2007, 25, 1239–1248.
[23]
Tsai, D.M.; Huang, T. Automated surface inspection for statistical textures. Image Vision Comput. 2003, 21, 307–323.
[24]
Sezgin, M.; Sankur, B. Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative evaluation. J. Electron. Imaging 2004, 13, 146–168.
[25]
Wong, W.K.; Yuen, C.W.N.; Fan, D.D.; Chan, L.K.; Fung, E.H.K. Stitching defect detection and classification using wavelet transform and BP neural network. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 3845–3856.
[26]
Lin, H.-D. Automated visual inspection of ripple defects using wavelet characteristic based multivariate statistical approach. Image Vision Comput. 2007, 25, 1785–1801.
[27]
Tsai, D.Y.; Lee, Y.; Matsuyama, E. Information entropy measure for evaluation of image quality. J. Digit. Imaging 2008, 21, 338–347.
[28]
Coifman, R.R.; Wickerhauser, M.V. Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1992, 38, 713–718.
