Fraud in medical publishing has risen to the national spotlight as manufactured and suspect data have led to retractions of papers in prominent journals. Moral turpitude in medical research has led to the loss of National Institute of Health (NIH) grants, directly affected patient care, and has led to severe legal ramifications for some authors. While there are multiple checks and balances in medical research to prevent fraud, the final enforcement lies with journal editors and publishers. There is an ethical and legal obligation to make careful and critical examinations of the medical research published in their journals. Failure to follow the highest standards in medical publishing can lead to legal liability and destroy a journal’s integrity. More significant, however, is the protection of the medical profession’s trust with their colleagues and the public they serve. This article discusses various techniques and tools available to editors and publishers that can help curtail fraud in medical publishing.
References
[1]
Van Noorden, R. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions. Nature, 5 October 2011. Available online: http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/full/478026a.html (accessed on 1 October 2013).
[2]
Steen, G.R. Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J. Med. Ethics. 24 December 2010. Available online: http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2010/12/23/jme.2010.040923 (accessed on 1 October 2013).
[3]
Bartlett, T. Document Sheds Light on Investigation at Harvard. Available online: http://chronicle.com/article/Document-Sheds-Light-on/123988/ (accessed on 1 October 2013).
[4]
Reich, E.S. Misconduct ruling is silent on intent. Nature 2012, 489, 189–190, doi:10.1038/489189a.
[5]
Wade, N. Scientist Under Inquiry Resigns From Harvard. Available online: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/21/science/21hauser.html?_r=0 (accessed on 1 October 2013).
Pelley, S. Deception at duke: Fraud in cancer care? CBSNews.. CBS Interactive, 12 Feb. 2012. Web. 09 Dec. 2012. Available online: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57376073/ (accessed on 1 October 2013).
[8]
Misconduct in science: An array of errors. The Economist 2011.
[9]
Benford, F. The law of anomalous numbers. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 1938, 78, 551–572.
[10]
Newcomb, S. Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. Am. J. Math. 1881, 4, 39–40, doi:10.2307/2369148.
[11]
True Cost of Research Misconduct. 2012 iThenticate Report, Available online: http://www.ithenticate.com/research-misconduct-report/ (accessed on 1 October 2013).
