Urban-rural distinctions are particularly challenging in the context of fast growing cities in the developing world. Through an example of the Indian city of Bangalore, we demonstrate the case for development of more continuous approaches of urban representation that are needed in many parts of the world. Thus even some of the oldest areas in Bangalore, which have been part of an urban center for centuries, exhibit aspects of rurality, as much as other recently developing peri-urban parts of the city. We demonstrate the considerable heterogeneities in urbanity and rurality that exist in Bangalore, which constitutes complex mosaics of rural and urban systems. In contexts such as these, binary representations of the urban rural dichotomy break down, as does the gradient approach to urbanity. There does not appear to be any obvious relationship between the time span for which a site has been urbanized, and the degree to which rurality still maintains its influence on these fluid urban landscapes. New theories and methods are needed to fully represent the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of rurality and urbanity in these fluid landscapes, moving beyond traditional, discretized urban vs. rural classifications, as well as relatively simplistic gradient-based urban to rural analyses.
References
[1]
Montgomery, M.R. The urban transformation of the developing world. Science 2008, 319, 761–764, doi:10.1126/science.1153012.
[2]
Seto, K.C.; Güneralp, B.; Hutyra, L.R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16083–16088, doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109.
[3]
United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2011 Revision; Department of Economics and Social Affairs-Population Division, United Nations/United Nations Publication: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
[4]
Nagendra, H.; Sudhira, H.S.; Katti, M.; Schewenius, M. Sub-Regional Assessment of India: Effects on Land Use, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities; Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., et al, Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 65–74.
[5]
Simon, D.; McGregor, D.; Nsiah-Gyabaah, K. The changing urban-rural interface of African cities: Definitional issues and an application to Kumasi, Ghana. Environ. Urban. 2004, 16, 235–248.
[6]
Narain, V.; Nischal, S. The peri-urban interface in Shahpur Khurd and Karnera, India. Environ. Urban. 2007, 19, 261–273, doi:10.1177/0956247807076905.
[7]
McIntyre, N.E.; Knowles-Yánez, K.; Hope, D. Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: Differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosyst. 2000, 1, 5–24.
[8]
Theobald, D.M. Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geogr. Rev. 2001, 91, 544–564, doi:10.2307/3594740.
[9]
Gagné, S.A. The distinguishing features of the study of the ecology of urban landscapes. Geogr. Compass 2013, 7, 266–286, doi:10.1111/gec3.12038.
[10]
McDonnell, M.J.; Hahs, A.K. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: Current status and future directions. Landsc. Ecol. 2008, 23, 1143–1155, doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9253-4.
[11]
Ishagi, N.; Ossiya, S.; Aliguma, L.; Aisu, C. Urban and Peri-Urban Livestock Keeping Among the Poor in Kampala City; Ibaren Konsultants: Kampala, Uganda, 2002.
[12]
Losada, H.; Martinez, H.; Vieyra, J.; Pealing, R.; Zavala, R.; Cortés, J. Urban agriculture in the metropolitan zone of Mexico City: Changes over time in urban, suburban and peri-urban areas. Environ. Urban. 1998, 10, 37–54, doi:10.1177/095624789801000214.
[13]
Jones-Smith, J.C.; Popkin, B.M. Understanding community context and adult health changes in China: development of an urbanicity scale. Soc. Sci. Med. 2010, 71, 1436–1446, doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.027.
[14]
Dahly, D.L.; Adair, L.S. Quantifying the urban environment: A scale measure of urbanicity outperforms the urban–rural dichotomy. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007, 64, 1407–1419, doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.019.
[15]
Rice, B.L. Epigraphica Carnatica Volume IX: Inscriptions in the Bangalore District; Mysore Government Central Press: Bangalore, India, 1905.
[16]
Annaswamy, T.V. Bengaluru to Bangalore: Urban History of Bangalore from the Pre-Historic Period to the End of the 18th Century; Vengadam Publications: Bangalore, India, 2003.
Rice, B.L. Mysore: A Gazetteer Compiled for Government, Revised Edition, Volume I—Mysore in General; Archibald Constable and Company: Westminister, UK, 1897.
[19]
Kamath, S. Chapter 2 History. In Karnataka State Gazetteer: Bangalore District; Government of Karnataka: Bangalore, India, 1990.
[20]
Sudhira, H.S.; Nagendra, H. Local Assessment of Bangalore: Graying and Greening in Bangalore—Effects of Urbanization on Land Use, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities; Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., et al, Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 75–92.
[21]
Gopal, D. Flora in Slums of Bangalore, India: Ecological and Socio-Cultural Perspectives. M.Sc. Thesis, Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, 2011.
[22]
Srinivas, S. Landscapes of Urban Memory: The Sacred and the Civic in India’s High-Tech City; Orient Longman: Hyderabad, India, 2004.
[23]
Nair, J. The Promise of the Metropolis: Bangalore’s Twentieth Century; Oxford University Press: New Delhi, India, 2005.
[24]
Buchanan, F. A Journey from Madras through the Countries of Mysore, Canara, and Malabar, 2nd ed. ed.; Higginbotham and Co.: Madras, India, 1870; Volume I.
[25]
Boone, C.G.; Redman, C.L.; Blanco, H.; Haase, D.; Koch, J.; Lwasa, S.; Nagendra, H.; Pauleit, S.; Pickett, S.T.A.; Seto, K.C.; et al. Reconceptualizing Land Use in an Urban Era. Forthcoming in Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era; Seto, K.C., Reenberg, A., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013.
[26]
Nagendra, H.; Gopal, D. Tree diversity, distribution, history and change in urban park. Urban Ecosyst. 2011, 14, 211–223, doi:10.1007/s11252-010-0148-1.
[27]
McCarthy, J. Rural geography: Globalizing the countryside. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2008, 32, 129–137, doi:10.1177/0309132507082559.
[28]
Allen, A. Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: Perspectives on an emerging field. Environ. Urban. 2003, 15, 135–148.
[29]
Kroll, F.; Müller, F.; Haase, D.; Fohrer, N. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 521–535, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008.
[30]
Modica, G.; Vizzari, M.; Pollino, M.; Fichera, C.R.; Zoccali, P.; Fazio, S.D. Spatio-temporal analysis of the urban-rural gradient structure: An application in a Mediterranean mountainous landscape (Serra San Bruno, Italy). Earth Syst. Dyn. Discuss. 2012, 3, 827–870, doi:10.5194/esdd-3-827-2012.
[31]
Yang, Y.T.; Zhou, Q.M.; Gong, J.Y.; Wang, Y.Y. Gradient analysis of landscape spatial and temporal pattern changes in Beijing metropolitan area. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2010, 53, 91–98, doi:10.1007/s11431-010-3206-2.
