The primary purpose of this study was to explore the link between rail and road traffic noise and overall life satisfaction. While the negative relationship between residential satisfaction and traffic noise is relatively well-established, much less is known about the effect of traffic noise on overall life satisfaction. Based on results of previous studies, we propose a model that links objective noise levels, noise sensitivity, noise annoyance, residential satisfaction and life satisfaction. Since it is not clear whether a bottom-up or top-down relationship between residential satisfaction and life satisfaction holds, we specify models that incorporate both of these theoretical propositions. Empirical models are tested using structural equation modeling and data from a survey among residents of areas with high levels of road traffic noise (n1 = 354) and rail traffic noise (n2 = 228). We find that traffic noise has a negative effect on residential satisfaction, but no significant direct or indirect effects on overall life satisfaction. Noise annoyance due to road and rail traffic noise has strong negative effect on residential satisfaction rather than on overall life satisfaction. These results are very similar for the road and railway traffic contexts and regardless of whether the model assumes the top-down or bottom-up direction of the causation between life satisfaction and residential satisfaction.
References
[1]
Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise—Quantification of Healthy Life Years Lost in Europe; WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.
[2]
Position Paper on Dose-Effect Relationships for Night Time Noise; European Commission Working Group on Health and Socio-Economic Aspects: Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
[3]
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of the Environmental Noise Directive in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 2002/49/EC; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
[4]
Den Boer, L.C.; Schroten, A. Traffic Noise Reduction in Europe—Health Effects, Social Costs and Technical and Policy Options to Reduce Road and Rail Traffic Noise; CE Delft: Delft, The Netherlands, 2007.
[5]
Miedema, H.M.; Oudshoorn, C.G. Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 409–416, doi:10.1289/ehp.01109409.
[6]
Lim, C.; Kim, J.; Hong, J.; Lee, S. The relationship between railway noise and community annoyance in Korea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120, 2037–2042, doi:10.1121/1.2266539.
[7]
Morihara, T.; Sato, T.; Yano, T. Comparison of dose-response relationships between railway and road traffic noises: The moderating effect of distance. J. Sound Vib. 2004, 277, 559–565, doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.017.
[8]
Lindvall, T.; Radford, E.P. Measurement of annoyance due to exposure to environmental factors. Environ. Res. 1973, 6, 1–36.
[9]
Miedema, H.M.E. Annoyance caused by environmental noise: Elements for evidence-based noise policies. J. Soc. Issues 2007, 63, 41–57.
[10]
Fyhri, A.; Klaboe, R. Road traffic noise, sensitivity, annoyance and self-reported health—A structural equation model exercise. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 91–97, doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.08.006.
[11]
Schultz, T.J. Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1978, 64, 377–405, doi:10.1121/1.382013.
[12]
Pedersen, T. The “Genlyd” Noise Annoyance Model: Dose-Response Relationships Modelled by Logistic Functions; DELTA Acoustics & Electronics: H？rsholm, Denmark, 2007.
[13]
Jakovljevic, B.; Paunovic, K.; Belojevic, G. Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 552–556, doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.10.001.
[14]
Fyhri, A.; Kl？boe, R. Road traffic noise, sensitivity, annoyance and self-reported health—A structural equation model exercise. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 91–97, doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.08.006.
[15]
Guski, R. Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Noise Health 1999, 1, 45–56.
[16]
Job, R.S.F. Noise sensitivity as a factor influencing human reaction to noise. Noise Health 1999, 1, 57–68.
[17]
Miedema, H.; Vos, H. Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 2003, 113, 1492–1504, doi:10.1121/1.1547437.
[18]
Paunovi？, K.; Jakovljevi？, B.; Belojevi？, G. Predictors of noise annoyance in noisy and quiet urban streets. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 3707–3711, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.033.
[19]
Weinstein, N.D. Individual differences in reactions to noise: A longitudinal study in a college dormitory. J. Appl. Psychol. 1978, 63, 458–466, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.458.
[20]
Zimmer, K.; Ellermeier, W. Psychometric Properties of Four Measures of Noise Sensitivity: A Comparison. J. Environ. Psychol. 1999, 19, 295–302, doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0133.
[21]
Schreckenberg, D.; Meis, M.; Kahl, C.; Peschel, C.; Eikmann, T. Aircraft noise and quality of life around Frankfurt Airport. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 3382–3405, doi:10.3390/ijerph7093382.
[22]
Frey, B.S.; Stutzer, A. What can economists learn from happiness research? J. Econ. Lit. 2002, 40, 402–435, doi:10.1257/002205102320161320.
[23]
Tella, R.D.; MacCulloch, R.J.; Oswald, A.J. The macroeconomics of happiness. Rev. Econ. Statist. 2003, 85, 809–827, doi:10.1162/003465303772815745.
[24]
Andrews, F.M.; Withey, S.B. Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1976.
[25]
Kahneman, D.; Sugden, R. Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environ. Resource Econ. 2005, 32, 161–181, doi:10.1007/s10640-005-6032-4.
[26]
van Praag, B.M.S.; Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
[27]
Clark, A.E.; Oswald, A.J. Unhappiness and unemployment. Econ. J. 1994, 104, 648–659, doi:10.2307/2234639.
[28]
Easterlin, R.A. Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Econ. J. 2001, 111, 465–484.
[29]
Tella, R.D.; MacCulloch, R.J.; Oswald, A.J. Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2001, 91, 335–341, doi:10.1257/aer.91.1.335.
[30]
Rehdanz, K.; Maddison, D. Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in Germany. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 64, 787–797, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.016.
[31]
Rehdanz, K.; Maddison, D. Climate and happiness. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 52, 111–125.
[32]
Brereton, F.; Clinch, J.P.; Ferreira, S. Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 386–396, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.008.
[33]
Frijters, P.; Praag, B.M.S.V. The effects of climate on welfare and well-Being in Russia. Climatic Change 1998, 39, 61–81, doi:10.1023/A:1005347721963.
[34]
Welsch, H. Preferences over prosperity and pollution: Environmental valuation based on happiness surveys. Kyklos 2002, 55, 473–494.
[35]
Welsch, H. Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 58, 801–813, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.006.
[36]
Welsch, H. Environmental welfare analysis: A life satisfaction approach. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 62, 544–551, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.017.
[37]
Ferreira, S.; Moro, M.; Clinch, J.P. Valuing the Environment Using the Life-Satisfaction Approach; Planning and Environmental Policy Research Series, PEP/06/05; University College Dublin: Dublin, Ireland, 2006.
[38]
MacKerron, G.; Mourato, S. Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 1441–1453, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.004.
[39]
Easterlin, R.A.; Angelescu, L.; Zweig, J.S. The impact of modern economic growth on urban–Rural differences in subjective well-being. World Develop. 2011, 39, 2187–2198, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.015.
[40]
Lercher, P.; Kofler, W.W. Behavioral and health responses associated with road traffic noise exposure along alpine through-traffic routes. Sci. Total Environ. 1996, 85–89, doi:10.1016/0048-9697(96)05194-7.
[41]
van Praag, B.M.S.; Baarsma, B.E. Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise. Econ. J. 2005, 115, 224–246, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00967.x.
[42]
Botteldooren, D.; Dekoninck, L.; Gillis, D. The influence of traffic noise on appreciation of the living quality of a neighborhood. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 777–798, doi:10.3390/ijerph8030777.
[43]
Kroesen, M.; Molin, E.J.E.; Miedema, H.M.E.; Vos, H.; Janssen, S.A.; van Wee, B. Estimation of the effects of aircraft noise on residential satisfaction. Transp. Res. Pt. D Transp. Environ. 2010, 15, 144–153, doi:10.1016/j.trd.2009.12.005.
[44]
Shepherd, D.; Welch, D.; Dirks, K.N.; Mathews, R. Exploring the relationship between noise sensitivity, annoyance and health-related quality of life in a sample of adults exposed to environmental noise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 3579–3594, doi:10.3390/ijerph7103580.
[45]
Dratva, J.; Zemp, E.; Felber Dietrich, D.; Bridevaux, P.-O.; Rochat, T.; Schindler, C.; Gerbase, M.W. Impact of road traffic noise annoyance on health-related quality of life: Results from a population-based study. Qual. Life Res. 2010, 19, 37–46, doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9571-2.
[46]
Rogerson, R.J. Environmental and health-related quality of life: Conceptual and methodological similarities. Soc. Sci. Med. 1995, 41, 1373–1382, doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00122-N.
[47]
Diener, E.; Suh, E.M.; Lucas, R.E.; Smith, H.L. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125, 276–302, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.
[48]
Heady, B.; Veenhoven, R.; Wearing, A. Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Soc. Indic. Res. 1991, 24, 81–100, doi:10.1007/BF00292652.
[49]
Scherpenzeel, A.; Saris, W. Causal direction in a model of life satisfaction: The top-down/bottom-up controversy. Soc. Indic. Res. 1996, 38, 161–180, doi:10.1007/BF00300457.
[50]
Amérigo, M.; Aragonés, J.I. A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. J. Environ. Psychol. 1997, 17, 47–57, doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0038.
[51]
Sirgy, M.J.; Cornwell, T. How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Soc. Indic. Res. 2002, 59, 79–114, doi:10.1023/A:1016021108513.
[52]
Bluhm, G.; Nordling, E.; Berglind, N. Road traffic noise and annoyance—An increasing environmental health problem. Noise Health 2004, 6, 43–49.
[53]
Cantril, H. The Pattern of Human Concerns; Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 1966.
[54]
Carroll, N.; Frijters, P.; Shields, M.A. Quantifying the costs of drought: New evidence from life satisfaction data. J. Popul. Econ. 2009, 22, 445–461, doi:10.1007/s00148-007-0174-3.
[55]
Luechinger, S. Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach. Econ. J. 2009, 119, 482–515, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02241.x.
[56]
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A.; Frijters, P. How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ. J. 2004, 114, 641–659, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x.
[57]
Kish, L. Survey Sampling; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
[58]
Bollen, K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, 1st ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1989.
[59]
Muthén, B. Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data. J. Econometrics 1983, 22, 43–65, doi:10.1016/0304-4076(83)90093-3.
[60]
Muthén, B.; du Toit, S.H.C.; Spisic, D. Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomesUnpublished paper. 1997.
[61]
Muthén, L.K.; Muthén, B.O. Mplus User’s Guide, 6th ed.; Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2010.
[62]
Hoe, S.L. Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. JAQM 2008, 3, 76–83.
[63]
MacCallum, R.C.; Browne, M.W.; Sugawara, H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods 1996, 1, 130–149, doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.
[64]
Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed.; The Guilford Press: London, UK, 2004.
[65]
Paternoster, R.; Brame, R.; Mazerolle, P.; Piquero, A. Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 1998, 36, 859–866, doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x.
[66]
Pospěch, P.; Delín, M.; Spě？ná, D. Quality of life in Czech rural areas. Agric. Econ.-Czech 2009, 55, 284–295.
[67]
Baum, S.; Arthurson, K.; Rickson, K. Happy people in mixed-up places: The association between the degree and type of local socioeconomic mix and expressions of neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Stud. 2010, 47, 467–485, doi:10.1177/0042098009351941.
[68]
Rubin, D. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 1974, 66, 688–701, doi:10.1037/h0037350.
