Reducing human vulnerability to chemical hazards in the industrialized city is a matter of great urgency. Vulnerability mapping is an alternative approach for providing vulnerability-reducing interventions in a region. This study presents a method for mapping human vulnerability to chemical hazards by using clustering analysis for effective vulnerability reduction. Taking the city of Shanghai as the study area, we measure human exposure to chemical hazards by using the proximity model with additionally considering the toxicity of hazardous substances, and capture the sensitivity and coping capacity with corresponding indicators. We perform an improved k-means clustering approach on the basis of genetic algorithm by using a 500 m × 500 m geographical grid as basic spatial unit. The sum of squared errors and silhouette coefficient are combined to measure the quality of clustering and to determine the optimal clustering number. Clustering result reveals a set of six typical human vulnerability patterns that show distinct vulnerability dimension combinations. The vulnerability mapping of the study area reflects cluster-specific vulnerability characteristics and their spatial distribution. Finally, we suggest specific points that can provide new insights in rationally allocating the limited funds for the vulnerability reduction of each cluster.
References
[1]
Malich, G.; Braun, M.; Loullis, P.; Winder, C. Comparison of regulations concerning hazardous substances from an international perspective. J. Hazard. Mater. 1998, 62, 143–159, doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(98)00157-5.
Adger, W.N.; Agrawala, S.; Mirza, M.M.Q.; Conde, C.; O’Brien, K.; Pulhin, J.; Pulwarty, R.; Smit, B.; Takahashi, K. Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., Hanson, C.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 717–743.
[4]
Kelly, P.M.; Adger, W.N. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim. Change 2000, 47, 325–352, doi:10.1023/A:1005627828199.
[5]
Luers, A.L.; Lobell, D.B.; Sklar, L.S.; Addams, C.L.; Matson, P.A. A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Glob. Environ. Change 2003, 13, 255–267, doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00054-2.
[6]
Preston, B.L.; Brooke, C.; Measham, T.G.; Smith, T.; Gorddard, R. Igniting change in local government: Lessons learned from a bushfire vulnerability assessment. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 2009, 14, 251–283, doi:10.1007/s11027-008-9163-4.
[7]
Birkmann, J. Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. In Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards-Towards Disaster Resilient Societies; Birkmann, J., Ed.; United Nations University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 9–54.
[8]
Janssen, M.A.; Schoon, M.L.; Ke, W.; B？rner, K. Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Glob. Environ. Change 2006, 16, 240–252.
[9]
Füssel, H.M. Vulnerability, a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob. Environ. Change 2007, 17, 155–167, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002.
[10]
Bone, C.; Alessa, L.; Altaweel, M.; Kliskey, A.; Lammers, R. Assessing the impacts of local knowledge and technology on climate change vulnerability in remote communities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 733–761, doi:10.3390/ijerph8030733.
[11]
Kim, E.S.; Choi, H.I. Assessment of vulnerability to extreme flash floods in design storms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 2907–2922, doi:10.3390/ijerph8072907.
[12]
Huang, G.L.; London, J.K. Cumulative environmental vulnerability and environmental justice in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 1593–1608, doi:10.3390/ijerph9051593.
[13]
Liverman, D. Vulnerability to global environmental change. In Global Environmental Risk; Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., Eds.; United Nations University Press: Tokyo, Japan, 2001; pp. 201–216.
[14]
Malone, E.L.; Engle, N.L. Evaluating regional vulnerability to climate change: Purposes and methods. Rev. Clim. Change 2011, 2, 462–474.
[15]
Turner, B.L., II; Kasperson, R.E.; Matson, P.A.; McCarthy, J.J.; Corell, R.W.; Christensen, L.; Eckley, N.; Kasperson, J.X.; Luers, A.; Martello, M.L.; et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8074–8079, doi:10.1073/pnas.1231335100.
[16]
Schneider, S.; Sarukhan, J. Overview of impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability to climate change. In Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability; McCarthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J., White, K.S., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001; pp. 75–103.
[17]
Turner, B.L., II; Matson, P.A.; McCarthy, J.J.; Corell, R.W.; Christensen, L.; Eckley, N.; Hovelsrud-Broda, G.K.; Kasperson, J.X.; Kasperson, R.E.; Luers, A.; et al. Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8080–8085, doi:10.1073/pnas.1231334100.
[18]
Kasperson, R.E.; Dow, K.; Archer, E.R.M.; Cáceres, D.; Downing, T.E.; Elmqvist, T.; Eriksen, S.; Folke, C.; Han, G.; Iyengar, K.; et al. Vulnerable people and places. In Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends; Hassan, R., Scholes, R., Ash, N., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; pp. 143–164.
[19]
Smit, B.; Wandel, J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob. Environ. Change 2006, 16, 282–292, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008.
[20]
Clark, G.E.; Moser, S.C.; Ratick, S.J.; Dow, K.; Meyer, W.B.; Emani, S.; Weigen, J.; Kasperson, J.X.; Kasperson, R.E.; Schwarz, H.E. Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: The case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 1998, 3, 59–82, doi:10.1023/A:1009609710795.
[21]
Preston, B.L.; Yuen, E.J.; Westaway, R.M. Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: A review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustain. Sci. 2011, 6, 177–202, doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0129-1.
[22]
de la Torre, A.; Iglesias, I.; Carballo, M.; Ramirez, P.; Munoz, M.J. An approach for mapping the vulnerability of European Union soils to antibiotic contamination. Sci. Total. Environ. 2012, 414, 672–679, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.032.
[23]
Petschel-Held, G.; Block, A.; Cassel-Gintz, M.; Kropp, J.; Lüdeke, M.K.B.; Moldenhauer, O.; Reusswig, F.; Schellnhuber, H.J. Syndromes of global change: A qualitative modelling approach to assist global environmental management. Environ. Modell. Assess. 1999, 4, 295–314, doi:10.1023/A:1019080704864.
[24]
O’Brien, K.L.; Leichenko, R.; Kelkar, U.; Venemad, H.; Aandahl, G.; Tompkins, H.; Javed, A.; Bhadwal, S.; Barg, S.; Nygaard, L.; West, J. Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: Climate change and globalization in India. Glob. Environ. Change 2004, 14, 303–313, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.01.001.
[25]
Yan, L.; Xu, X.G. Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental system from the perspective of hazard, sensitivity, and resilience: A case study of Beijing, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 61, 1179–1186, doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0440-7.
[26]
Chang, C.L.; Chao, Y.C. Using the analytical hierarchy process to assess the environmental vulnerabilities of basins in Taiwan. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 2939–2945, doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2162-z.
[27]
Zou, B.; Wilson, J.G.; Zhan, F.B.; Zeng, Y.N. An emission-weighted proximity model for air pollution exposure assessment. Sci. Total. Environ. 2009, 407, 4939–4945, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.014.
[28]
Bross, I. Estimates of the LD50: A critique. Biometrics 1950, 6, 413–423, doi:10.2307/3001785.
[29]
Weil, C.S. Tables for convenient calculation of median-effective dose (LD50 or ED50) and instructions in their use. Biometrics 1952, 8, 249–263, doi:10.2307/3001557.
[30]
Petrick, J.S.; Jagadish, B.; Mash, E.A.; Aposhian, H.V. Monomethylarsonous acid (MMA(III)) and arsenite: LD50 in hamsters and in vitro inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 651–656.
[31]
Zbinden, G.; Fluryroversi, M. Significance of the LD50-test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical-substances. Arch. Toxicol. 1981, 47, 77–99.
[32]
Schlede, E.; Mischke, U.; Roll, R.; Kayser, D. A national validation-study of the acute-toxic-class method—An alternative to the LD50 test. Arch. Toxicol. 1992, 66, 455–470, doi:10.1007/BF01970670.
[33]
Tan, P.N.; Steinbach, M.; Kumar, V. Introduction to Data Mining; Pearson Addison Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 487–556.
[34]
Shannon, C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379–423.
