The health care sector has become increasingly interested in developing personal health record (PHR) systems as an Internet-based telehealthcare implementation to improve the quality and decrease the cost of care. However, the factors that influence patients’ intention to use PHR systems remain unclear. Based on physicians’ therapeutic expertise, we implemented a web-based infertile PHR system and proposed an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) that integrates the physician-patient relationship (PPR) construct into TAM’s original perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) constructs to explore which factors will influence the behavioral intentions (BI) of infertile patients to use the PHR. From ninety participants from a medical center, 50 valid responses to a self-rating questionnaire were collected, yielding a response rate of 55.56%. The partial least squares (PLS) technique was used to assess the causal relationships that were hypothesized in the extended model. The results indicate that infertile patients expressed a moderately high intention to use the PHR system. The PPR and PU of patients had significant effects on their BI to use PHR, whereas the PEOU indirectly affected the patients’ BI through the PU. This investigation confirms that PPR can have a critical role in shaping patients’ perceptions of the use of healthcare information technologies. Hence, we suggest that hospitals should promote the potential usefulness of PHR and improve the quality of the physician-patient relationship to increase patients’ intention of using PHR.
References
[1]
Waegemann, C.P. The five levels of electronic health records. MD Comput. 1996, 13, 199–203.
[2]
Institute of Medicine (IOM). The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
[3]
American Telemedicine Association (AHA). What is Telemedicine? Available online: http://www.americantelemed.org/learn/what-is-telemedicine (accessed on 2 September 2013).
[4]
Tang, P.C.; Lansky, D. The missing link: Bridging the patient-provider health information gap. Health Aff. 2005, 24, 1290–1295.
[5]
Connecting for Health: A Public-Private Collaborative; Markle Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
[6]
Bozkurt, S.; Zayim, N.; Gulkesen, K.H.; Samur, M.K; Karaa？aoglu, N.; Saka, O. Usability of a web-based personal nutrition management tool. Inform. Health Soc. Care 2011, 36, 190–205.
[7]
Pirtle, B.; Chandra, A. An overview of consumer perceptions and acceptance as well as barriers and potential of electronic personal health records. Am. J. Health Sci. 2011, 2, 45–52.
[8]
Wen, K.Y.; Gary, K.; Fang, Z.; Suzanne, M. Consumers’ perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: Analysis of the 2007 health information national trends survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 2010, 12, doi:10.2196/jmir.1668.
[9]
Consumers and Health Information Technology: A National Survey; California HealthCare Foundation: Oakland, CA, USA, 2010.
[10]
Jian, W.S.; Shabbir, S.A.; Sood, S.P.; Lee, P.; Hsu, M.H.; Ho, C.H.; Li, Y.C.; Wen, H.C. Factors influencing consumer adoption of USB-based Personal Health Records in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2012, 12, doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-277.
[11]
Kaelber, D.C.; Jha, A.K.; Johnston, D.; Middleton, B.; Bates, D.W. A Research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008, 15, 729–736, doi:10.1197/jamia.M2547.
[12]
Steinwachs, D.M.; Roter, D.; Skinner, E.A.; Lehman, A.F.; Fahey, M.; Cullen, B.; Everett, A.S.; Gallucci, G. A web-based program to empower patients who have schizophrenia to discuss quality of care with mental health providers. Psychiatr. Serv. 2011, 62, 1296–1302, doi:10.1176/appi.ps.62.11.1296.
[13]
Weissman, A.; Gotlieb, L.; Ward, S.; Greenblatt, E.; Casper, R.F. Use of the internet by infertile couples. Fertil. Steril. 2000, 73, 1179–1182, doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00515-X.
[14]
Haagen, E.C.; Tuil, W.; Hendriks, J.; de Bruijn, R.P.; Braat, D.D.; Kremer, J.A. Current internet use and preferences of IVF and ICSI patients. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 2073–2078, doi:10.1093/humrep/deg423.
[15]
Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 982–1003, doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
[16]
American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA). Defining the personal health record. J. AHIMA. 2005, 76, 24–25.
[17]
Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). HIMSS Personal Health Records—Definition and Position Statement; HIMSS: Chicago, IL, USA, 2007.
[18]
Kim, M.I.; Johnson, K.B. Personal health records: Evaluation of functionality and utility. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2002, 9, 171–180, doi:10.1197/jamia.M0978.
[19]
Chen, T.H.; Chang, S.P.; Tsai, C.F.; Juang, K.D. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic. Hum. Reprod. 2004, 19, 2313–2318, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh414.
[20]
Domar, A.D.; Broome, A.; Zuttermeister, P.C.; Seibel, M.; Friedman, R. The prevalence and predictability of depression in infertile women. Fertil. Steril. 1992, 58, 1158–1163.
[21]
Eugster, A.; Vingerhoets, A.J. Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: A review. Soc. Sci. Med. 1999, 48, 575–589, doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00386-4.
[22]
Wischmann, T. Psychosocial aspects of fertility disorders. Urologe 2005, 44, 185–194, doi:10.1007/s00120-005-0779-7.
[23]
Lee, M.; Delaney, C.; Moorhead, S. Building a personal health record from a nursing perspective. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007, 76, S308–S316, doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.010.
[24]
Wright, A.; Sittig, D.F. Encryption characteristics of two usb-based personal health record devices. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007, 14, 397–399, doi:10.1197/jamia.M2352.
[25]
Sox, C.M.; Gribbons, W.M.; Loring, B.A.; Mandl, K.D.; Batista, R.; Porter, S.C. Patient-centered design of an information management module for a personally controlled health record. J. Med. Internet Res. 2010, 12, doi:10.2196/jmir.1269.
[26]
Krist, A.H.; Peele, E.; Woolf, S.H.; Rothemich, S.F.; Loomis, J.F.; Longo, D.R.; Kuzel, A.J. Designing a patient-centered personal health record to promote preventive care. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2011, 11, doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-73.
[27]
Kim, E.H.; Stolyar, A.; Lober, W.B.; Herbaugh, A.L.; Shinstrom, S.E.; Zierler, B.K.; Soh, C.B.; Kim, Y. Usage Patterns of a Personal Health Record by Elderly and Disabled Users. In Proceeding of the AMIA 2007 Symposium Proceedings, Chicago, IL, USA, 10–14 November 2007.
[28]
Chau, J.P.; Chung, L.C.; Wong, R.Y.; Loo, K.M.; Lo, S.H.; So, T.T.; Lau, M.S.; Yeung, T.H.; Leung, B.S.; Tong, M.L.; et al. An evaluation of a web-based diabetes education program designed to enhance self-management among patients living with diabetes. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2012, 30, 672–679, doi:10.1097/NXN.0b013e318261f1d2.
[29]
Logue, M.D.; Effken, J.A. Modeling factors that influence personal health records adoption. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2012, 30, 354–362.
[30]
Davis, F.D.; Venkatesh, V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 1996, 45, 19–45, doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040.
Pare, G.; Sicotte, C.; Jacques, H. The Effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians’ acceptance of clinical information systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006, 13, 197–205, doi:10.1197/jamia.M1930.
[33]
Aggelidis, V.P.; Chatzoglou, P.D. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78, 115–126, doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.006.
[34]
Kowitlawakul, Y. The technology acceptance model: Predicting nurses’ intention to use telemedicine technology (eICU). Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2011, 29, 411–418, doi:10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9dd4a.
[35]
Rahimpour, M.; Lovell, N.H.; Celler, B.G.; McCormick, J. Patients’ perceptions of a home telecare system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77, 486–498, doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.006.
[36]
Or, C.; Karsh, B.T.; Severtson, D.J.; Burke, L.J.; Brown, R.L.; Brennan, P.F. Factors affecting home care patients’ acceptance of a web-based interactive self-management technology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2011, 18, 51–59, doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.007336.
[37]
Lim, S.H.; Kim, D. The role of trust in the use of health infomediaries among university students. Inform. Health Soc. Care 2012, 37, 92–105, doi:10.3109/17538157.2011.647933.
Roter, D.L.; Hall, J.A. Doctors Talking With Patients/Patients Talking with Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits; Auburn House: Westport, CT, USA, 1992.
[40]
The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education, and Research; Lipkin, M., Putnam, S.M., Lazare, A., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
[41]
Scott, A. Economics of General Practice. In Handbook of Health Economics; Culyer, A.J., Newhouse, J.P., Eds.; Elsevier Science: New York, NY, USA, 2000; Volume 1B.
[42]
Winkelman, W.J.; Leonard, K.J.; Rossos, P.G. Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: Employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005, 12, 306–314, doi:10.1197/jamia.M1712.
[43]
Ventres, W.; Kooienga, S.; Vuckovic, N.; Marlin, R.; Nygren, P.; Stewart, V. Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: An ethnographic analysis. Ann. Fam. Med. 2006, 4, 124–131, doi:10.1370/afm.425.
[44]
Werner, P.; Karnieli, E. A model of the willingness to use telemedicine for routine and specialized care. J. Telemed. Telecare 2003, 9, 264–272, doi:10.1258/135763303769211274.
[45]
Werner, P. Willingness to use telemedicine for psychiatric care. Telemed. e-Health 2004, 10, 286–293, doi:10.1089/tmj.2004.10.286.
[46]
？st, L.G. Applied relaxation: description of a coping technique and review of controlled studies. Behav. Res. Ther. 1987, 25, 397–409, doi:10.1016/0005-7967(87)90017-9.
[47]
Hung, C.I.; Weng, L.J.; Su, Y.J.; Liu, C.Y. Depression and somatic symptoms scale: A new scale with both depression and somatic symptoms emphasized. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2006, 60, 700–708, doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01585.x.
[48]
The Fertility Quality of Life Questionnaire, 2009. Available online: http://www.fertiqol.org (accessed on 20 September 2012).
[49]
Department of Health, UK. The GP Patient Survey Questionnaire (July–September 2011). Available online: http://www.gp-patient.co.uk/download/Questionnaires/Y6Q1%20GP%20Patient%20Survey%20questionnaire.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2012).
[50]
Chin, W.W. How to Write up and Report PLS Analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares Concepts, Methods and Applications, 1st ed.; Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
[51]
Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50, doi:10.2307/3151312.
[52]
O’Leary-Kelly, S.W.; Vokurka, R.J. The empirical assessment of construct validity. J. Oper. Manag. 1998, 16, 387–405, doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00020-5.
[53]
Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv. Int. Mark. 2009, 20, 277–319.
[54]
Wetzels, M.; Schroder, G.O.; Oppen, V.C. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quart. 2009, 33, 177–195.
[55]
Van Bon, A.C.; Kohinor, M.J.; Hoekstra, J.B.; von Basum, G.; de Vries, J.H. Patients’ perception and future acceptance of an artificial pancreas. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2010, 4, 596–602.
[56]
Ziefle, M.; Wilkowska, W. Technology Acceptability for Medical Assistance. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, Munchen, Germany, 22–25 March 2010.
[57]
Hargreaves, J.S. Will electronic personal health records benefit providers and patients in rural America? Telemed. e-Health 2010, 16, 167–176, doi:10.1089/tmj.2009.0063.
[58]
Klein, R. Internet-based patient–physician electronic communication applications: Patient acceptance and trust. e-Service J. 2007, 5, 27–51, doi:10.2979/ESJ.2007.5.2.27.
[59]
Lim, S.; Xue, L.; Yen, C.C.; Chang, L.; Chan, H.C.; Tai, B.C.; Duh, B.L.; Choolani, M. A study on Singaporean women’s acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2011, 80, e189–e202, doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.007.
[60]
Ta, W.H.; Ooi, K.B.; Sim, J.J.; Phusavat, K. Determinants of mobile learning adoption: An empirical analysis. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2012, 52, 82–91.
[61]
Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; Straub, D.W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. 2003, 27, 51–90.
[62]
Ong, C.S.; Lai, J.Y.; Wang, Y.S. Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Inf. Manag. 2004, 41, 795–804, doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.012.
[63]
Teo, T.; van Schaik, P. Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers: A structural-equation modeling approach. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 2009, 18, 47–66.
[64]
Pikkarainen, T.; Pikkarainen, K.; Karjaluoto, H.; Pahnila, S. Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Res. 2004, 14, 224–235, doi:10.1108/10662240410542652.
[65]
Wu, J.H.; Wang, S.C. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 2006, 42, 719–729.
[66]
Barker, D.J.; van Schaik, P.; Simpson, D.S.; Corbett, W.A. Evaluating a spoken dialogue system for recording clinical observations during an endoscopic examination. Inform. Health Soc. Care 2003, 28, 85–97, doi:10.1080/14639230310001600452.
[67]
Liang, H.; Xue, Y.; Chase, S.K. Online health information seeking by people with physical disabilities due to neurological conditions. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2011, 78, 115–126.
[68]
Shaw, B.R.; Han, J.Y.; Hawkins, R.P.; James, S.; McTavish, F.; Gustafson, D.H. Doctor–patient relationship as motivation and outcome: Examining uses of an interactive cancer communication system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007, 76, 274–282, doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.12.002.
[69]
Tieman, J. Survey: Hospital dabble in internet. Mod. Healthc. 2000, 52, 52,54.
[70]
Ball, M.J.; Lillis, J. E-health: Transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001, 61, 1–10, doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(00)00130-1.
[71]
Anderson, J.G.; Rainey, M.R.; Eysenbach, G. The impact of CyberHealthcare on the Physician–patient relationship. J. Med. Syst. 2003, 27, 67–84, doi:10.1023/A:1021061229743.
[72]
Omary, Z.; Lupiana, D.; Mtenzi, F.; Wu, B. Analysis of the challenges affecting e-healthcare adoption in developing countries: A case of Tanzania. Int. J. Inf. Stud. 2010, 2, 38–50.
[73]
Fang, D.; Fang, C.L.; Tsai, B.K.; Lan, L.C.; Hsu, W.S. Relationships among trust in messages, risk perception, and risk reduction preferences based upon avian influenza in Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 2742–2757, doi:10.3390/ijerph9082742.
