Because of their vast diversity, measured by both numbers of species as well as life history traits, insects defy comprehensive conservation planning. Thus, almost all insect conservation efforts target individual species. However, serious insect conservation requires goals that are set at the faunal level and conservation success requires strategies that conserve intact communities. This task is complicated in agricultural landscapes by high levels of habitat fragmentation and isolation. In many regions, once widespread insect communities are now functionally trapped on islands of ecosystem remnants and subject to a variety of stressors associated with isolation, small population sizes and artificial population fragmentation. In fragmented landscapes ecological restoration can be an effective strategy for reducing localized insect extinction rates, but insects are seldom included in restoration design criteria. It is possible to incorporate a few simple conservation criteria into restoration designs that enhance impacts to entire insect communities. Restoration can be used as a strategy to address fragmentation threats to isolated insect communities if insect communities are incorporated at the onset of restoration planning. Fully incorporating insect communities into restoration designs may increase the cost of restoration two- to three-fold, but the benefits to biodiversity conservation and the ecological services provided by intact insect communities justify the cost.
References
[1]
Panzer, R.; Shuey, J.; Stillwaugh, D. Characterizing insects within fragmented landscapes. Nat. Areas J. 1997, 17, 53–55.
[2]
Lessons from Amazonia: The Ecology and Conservation of a Fragmented Forest; Bierregaard, R., Gascon, C., Lovejoy, T., Mesquita, R., Eds.; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2001.
[3]
Lindenmayer, D.; Fischer, J. Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change: An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[4]
Hanski, I. Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 1999, 87, 209–219, doi:10.2307/3546736.
[5]
Hamilton, K. Bugs reveal an extensive, long-lost northern tallgrass prairie. BioScience 2005, 55, 49–59, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0049:BRAELN]2.0.CO;2.
[6]
Metzler, E.; Shuey, J.; Ferge, L.; Henderson, R.; Goldstein, P. Contributions to the Understanding of Tallgrass Prairie-Dependent Butterflies and Moths (Lepidoptera) and their Biogeography in the United States. Bulletin of the Ohio Biological Survey; Ohio Biological Survey: Columbus, OH, USA, 2005; Volume 15, p. Number 1.
[7]
Panzer, R. Management of prairie remnants for insect conservation. Nat. Areas J. 1988, 8, 83–90.
[8]
Panzer, R.; Stillwaugh, D.; Gnaedinger, R.; Derkovitz, G. Prevalence of remnant-dependence among the prairie- and savanna-inhabiting insects of the Chicago region. Nat. Areas J. 1995, 15, 101–116.
[9]
Panzer, R.; Gnaedinger, R.; Derkovitz, G. The prevalence and status of conservative prairie and sand savanna insects in the Chicago wilderness region. Nat. Areas J. 2010, 30, 73–81, doi:10.3375/043.030.0108.
[10]
Panzer, R.; Schwartz, M.W. Effectiveness of a vegetation-based approach to insect conservation. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12, 693–702, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97051.x.
[11]
Association for Biodiversity Information. Plant Communities of the Midwest: Classification in an Ecological Context; Faber-Langendoen, D., Ed.; Association for Biodiversity Information: Arlington, VA, USA, 2001.
[12]
Groves, C.; Jensen, D.; Valutis, L.; Redford, K.; Shaffer, M.; Scott, J.; Baumgartner, J.; Higgins, J.; Beck, M.; Anderson, M. Planning for biodiversity conservation: Putting conservation science into practice. BioScience 2002, 52, 499–511, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0499:PFBCPC]2.0.CO;2.
[13]
Das, A.; Krishnaswamya, J.; Bawaa, K.; Kirana, M.; Srinivasc, V.; Kumarc, N.; Karanth, K. Prioritization of conservation areas in the Western Ghats, India. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 133, 16–13, doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.023.
[14]
Howard, P.; Viskanic, P.; Davenport, T.; Kigenyi, F.; Baltzer, M.; Dickenson, C.; Lwanga, J.; Matthews, R.A.; Balmford, A. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 1998, 392, 472–475.
[15]
Shuey, J. The Status of butterfly conservation in Indiana, Assessing the effectiveness of a complimentary system of habitat reserves relative to species at risk and divergent populations. Am. Midland Nat. 2005, 153, 117–127.
[16]
Hanski, I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 1998, 396, 41–49, doi:10.1038/23876.
[17]
Sampson, F.; Knopf, F. Prairie conservation in North America. BioScience 1994, 44, 418–421, doi:10.2307/1312365.
[18]
Biedermann, R.; Achtziger, R.; Nickel, H.; Stewart, A. Conservation of grassland leafhoppers: A brief review. J. Insect Conserv. 2005, 9, 229–243, doi:10.1007/s10841-005-0531-z.
[19]
Summerville, K.; Crist, T. Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes. Ecography 2004, 27, 3–12, doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03664.x.
[20]
Jonas, J.; Whiles, M.; Charlton, R. Aboveground invertebrate response to land management differences in a central Kansas Grassland. Environ. Entomol. 2002, 31, 1142–1152, doi:10.1603/0046-225X-31.6.1142.
[21]
Orlofske, J.; Ohnesorg, W.; Debinski, D. A comparison of the arthropod communities in remnant, restored, and reconstructed Iowa tallgrass prairies. Nat. Areas J. 2011, 31, 148–155, doi:10.3375/043.031.0207.
[22]
Brand, R.; Dunn, C. Diversity and abundance of springtails (insecta: collembola) in native and restored tallgrass prairies. Am. Midland Nat. 1998, 139, 235–242, doi:10.1674/0003-0031(1998)139[0235:DAAOSI]2.0.CO;2.
[23]
Rowe, H.; Holland, J. High plant richness in prairie reconstructions support diverse leafhopper communities. Restor. Ecol. 2013, 21, 174–180, doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00882.x.
[24]
Shepherd, S.; Debinski, D. Evaluation of isolated and integrated prairie reconstructions as habitat for prairie butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 126, 51–61, doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.021.
[25]
Woodcock, B.; Vogiatzakis, I.; Westbury, D.; Lawson, C.; Edwards, A.; Brook, A.; Harris, S.; Lock, K.; Maczey, N.; Masters, G.; et al. The role of management and landscape context in the restoration of grassland phytophagous beetles. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47, 366–376, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01776.x.
[26]
Herkert, J. The effects of habitat fragmentation on Midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecol. Appl. 1994, 4, 461–471, doi:10.2307/1941950.
[27]
Semlitsch, R. Principles for management of aquatic breeding amphibians. J. Wildlife Manag. 2000, 64, 615–631, doi:10.2307/3802732.
[28]
Shepherd, S.; Debinski, D. Reintroduction of Regal Fritillary (Speyeria idalia) to a restored prairie. Ecol. Restor. 2005, 23, 244–250, doi:10.3368/er.23.4.244.
[29]
Schultz, C. Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design in a rare Oregon butterfly. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12, 284–292, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96266.x.
[30]
Schultz, C. Restoring resources for an endangered butterfly. J. Appl. Ecol. 2001, 38, 1007–1019, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00659.x.
[31]
Samways, M. Insect Conservation Biology; Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1997.
[32]
New, T. Butterfly Conservation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1997.
[33]
Naeem, S. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning in Restored Ecosystems: Extracting Principles for a Synthetic Perspective. In Foundations of Restoration Ecology; Falk, D., Palmer, M., Zedler, J., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2006; pp. 210–237.
[34]
Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology—Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice; Temperton, V., Hobbs, R., Nuttle, T., Halle, S., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
[35]
Schwartz, M.; Brigham, C.; Hoeksema, J.; Lyons, K.; Mills, M.; van Mantgem, P. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 2000, 122, 297–305, doi:10.1007/s004420050035.
[36]
Conservation Measures Partnership. 2013 The Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation, Version 3.0. Available online: http://www.conservationmeasures.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CMP-OS-V3–0-Final.pdf (accessed on 2 November 2013).
[37]
Gilpin, M.; Soule, M. Minimum Viable Populations: Processes of Species Extinction. In Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity; Soule, M., Ed.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 1986; pp. 19–34.
[38]
Szymanski, J.; Shuey, J.; Oberhauser, K. Population structure of the endangered Mitchell’S satyr, Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii (French): Implications for conservation. Am. Midland Nat. 2004, 152, 304–322, doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2004)152[0304:PSOTEM]2.0.CO;2.
[39]
Wells, C.; Williams, R.; Walker, G.; Haddad, N. Effects of corridors on genetics of a butterfly in a landscape experiment. South. Nat. 2009, 8, 709–722, doi:10.1656/058.008.0412.
[40]
Hamilton, K. Evaluation of Leafhoppers and Their Relatives (Insecta: Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha) as Indicators of Prairie Preserve Quality. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth North American Prairie Conference, Manhattan, KS, USA, 12–16 July 1994.
[41]
Panzer, R.; Schwartz, M. Effects of management burning on prairie insect species richness within a system of small, highly fragmented reserves. Biol. Conserv. 2000, 96, 363–369, doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00065-3.
[42]
Woo, I.; Zedler, J. Can nutrients alone shift a sedge meadow towards dominance by the invasive Typha × Glauca. Wetlands 2002, 22, 509–521, doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0509:CNASAS]2.0.CO;2.
[43]
Climate Wizard Custom. 2013. Available online: http://www.climatewizardcustom.org/ (accessed on 2 November 2013).
[44]
O’Leary, C.; Shuey, J. Ecosystem Restoration at the Landscape-Scale: Design and Implementation at the Efroymson Restoration. In Proceedings of the 18th North American Prairie Conference, Mason City, IA, USA, 16–20 July 2000.
[45]
Shuey, J.; Metzler, E.; Tungesvick, K. Moth communities correspond with plant communities in Midwestern (Indiana, USA) sand prairies and oak barrens and their degradation endpoints. Am. Midland Nat. 2012, 167, 273–284.
[46]
Forman, R. Land Mosaics. The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995.
[47]
Braun, E.L. Glacial and post-glacial plant migrations indicated by relic colonies of southern Ohio. Ecology 1928, 9, 284–302, doi:10.2307/1932369.
[48]
Shane, L. Late-glacial vegetational and climatic history of the Allegheny Plateau and the Till Plains of Ohio and Indiana, USA. Boreas 1987, 16, 1–20, doi:10.1111/j.1502-3885.1987.tb00750.x.
[49]
Gustafson, E.; Sturtevant, B. Modeling forest mortality caused by drought stress: Implications for climate change. Ecosystems 2013, 16, 60–74, doi:10.1007/s10021-012-9596-1.
[50]
Dale, V.; Joyce, L.; McNulty, S.; Neilson, R.; Ayres, M.; Flannigan, M.; Hanson, P.; Irland, L.; Lugo, A.; Peterson, C.; et al. Climate change and forest disturbances. BioScience 2001, 51, 723–734, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2.
[51]
Panzer, R. Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, IL, USA. Unpublished work, 2009.
[52]
Shuey, J. Habitat associations of wetland butterflies near the glacial Maxima in Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan. J. Res. Lepidoptera 1985, 24, 176–186.
[53]
Landis, D.; Fiedler, A.; Hamm, C.; Cuthrell, D.; Schools, E.; Pearsall, D.; Herbert, M.; Doran, P. Insect conservation in Michigan prairie fen: Addressing the challenge of global change. J. Insect Conserv. 2012, 16, 131–142, doi:10.1007/s10841-011-9398-3.
[54]
Andreas, B. The relationship between Ohio peatland distribution and buried river valleys. Ohio J. Sci. 1985, 85, 116–125.
[55]
Swinehart, A.; Parker, G. Palaeoecology and development of peatlands in Indiana. Am. Midland Nat. 2000, 143, 267–297, doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2000)143[0267:PADOPI]2.0.CO;2.
[56]
Shirey, P.; Lamberti, G. Assisted colonization under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv. Lett. 2010, 3, 45–52, doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00083.x.
[57]
Losey, J.; Vaughan, M. The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. BioScience 2006, 56, 311–323, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[311:TEVOES]2.0.CO;2.
