I use data from a previous experiment for classifying subjects based on their behavior in the trust game. Prior literature defines a “reciprocity effect” as the tendency for Second Movers to return proportions increasing in the amounts that they receive. In the data that I use, 31% of Second Movers show reciprocity effects, 31% are neutral, and 25% consistently free-ride, indicating that the aggregate reciprocity effect for the sample as a whole is attributable to a minority of the subjects.
References
[1]
Berg, J.; Dickhaut, J.; McCabe, K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 1995, 10, 122–142, doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027.
[2]
Fehr, E.; Schmidt, K.M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 1999, 114, 817–868, doi:10.1162/003355399556151.
[3]
Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 1993, 83, 1281–1302.
[4]
Dufwenberg, M.; Kirchsteiger, G. A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games Econ. Behav. 2004, 47, 268–298, doi:10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003.
[5]
Cox, J.C. How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games Econ. Behav. 2004, 46, 260–281, doi:10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00119-2.
[6]
Cochard, F.; Nguyen-Van, P.; Willinger, M. Trusting behavior in a repeated investment game. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2004, 55, 31–44, doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2003.07.004.
[7]
Fischbacher, U.; Gaechter, S.; Fehr, E. Are people conditionally cooperative? Econ. Lett. 2001, 71, 397–404, doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9.
[8]
Eckel, C.C.; Petrie, R. Face value. Am. Econ. Rev. 2011, 101, 1497–1513, doi:10.1257/aer.101.4.1497.
[9]
Brandts, J.; Charness, G. The strategy versus the direct-response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons. Exp. Econ. 2011, 14, 375–398, doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9272-x.
[10]
Amdur, D.; Schmick, E. Does the direct-response method induce guilt aversion in a trust game? Econ. Bull. 2013, 33, 687–693.
[11]
Rick, S.; Weber, R.A. Meaningful learning and transfer of learning in repeated games played repeatedly without feedback. Games Econ. Behav. 2010, 68, 716–730, doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.10.004.
