The theory of the archetypes and the hypothesis of the collective unconscious are two of the central characteristics of analytical psychology. These provoke, however, varying reactions among academic psychologists. Empirical studies which test these hypotheses are rare. Rosen, Smith, Huston and Gonzales proposed a cognitive psychological experimental paradigm to investigate the nature of archetypes and the collective unconscious as archetypal (evolutionary) memory. In this article we report the results of a cross-cultural replication of Rosen et al. conducted in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. In short, this experiment corroborated previous findings by Rosen et al., based on English speakers, and demonstrated a recall advantage for archetypal symbol meaning pairs vs. other symbol/meaning pairings. The fact that the same pattern of results was observed across two different cultures and languages makes it less likely that they are attributable to a specific cultural or linguistic context.
References
[1]
Roesler, C. Are archetypes transmitted more by culture than biology? Questions arising from conceptualizations of the archetype. J. Anal. Psychol. 2012, 57, 223–246, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01963.x.
[2]
Rosen, D.H.; Smith, S.M.; Huston, H.L.; Gonzalez, G. Empirical Study of Associations between Symbols and Their Meanings: Evidence of Collective Unconscious (Archetypal) Memory. J. Anal. Psychol. 1991, 36, 211–228, doi:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1991.00211.x.
[3]
Knox, J. Archetype, Attachment, Analysis: Jungian Psychology and the Emergent Mind; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
[4]
Knox, J. From archetypes to reflective function. J. Anal. Psychol. 2004, 49, 1–19, doi:10.1111/j.0021-8774.2004.0437.x.
[5]
Knox, J. Mirror neurons and embodied simulation in the development of archetypes and self-agency. J. Anal. Psychol. 2009, 54, 307–323, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01782.x.
[6]
Cambray, J. Synchronicity and emergence. Am. Imago 2002, 59, 409–434, doi:10.1353/aim.2002.0023.
[7]
Cambray, J. Synchronicity: Nature and Psyche in an Interconnected Universe, 1st ed. ed.; Texas A&M University Press: College Station, TX, USA, 2009.
[8]
Goodwyn, E. The Neurobiology of Gods: How Brain Physiology Shapes the Recurrent Imagery of Myth and Dreams, 1st ed. ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
[9]
Roesler, C. Analythische Psychologie Heute: Der Aktuelle Stand der Forschung zur Psychologie C. G. Jungs. (in German); Karger Verlag: Basel, Switzerland, 2010.
[10]
Maloney, A. Preference rating of images representing archetypal themes. J. Anal. Psychol. 1999, 44, 101–116, doi:10.1111/1465-5922.00070.
[11]
Huston, H. Direct and indirect tests of archetypal memory. Master’s Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA, 1992.
[12]
Bradshaw, S.; Storm, L. Archetypes, symbols and the apprehension of meaning. Int. J. Jungian Stud. 2013, 5, 154–176, doi:10.1080/19409052.2012.685662.
Jung, C.G. The Psychological Aspects of the Mother Archetype. In The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, 2nd ed.; Read, H., Fordham, M., Adler, G., McGuire, W., Eds.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1968; Volume 9-I.
[15]
Jung, C.G. On the Nature of the Psyche. In The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, 2nd ed.; Read, H., Fordham, M., Adler, G., McGuire, W., Eds.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1969; Volume 8.
[16]
Merchant, J. The developmental/emergent model of archetype, its implications and its application to shamanism. J. Anal. Psychol. 2006, 51, 125–144, doi:10.1111/j.1465-5922.2006.576_1.x.
[17]
Merchant, J. A reappraisal of classical archetype theory and its implications for theory and practice. J. Anal. Psychol. 2009, 54, 339–358, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01784.x.
[18]
Sotirova-Kohli, M.; Rosen, D.H.; Smith, S.M.; Henderson, P.; Taki-Reece, S. Empirical study of kanji as archetypal images: Understanding the collective unconscious as part of the Japanese language. J. Anal. Psychol. 2011, 56, 109–132, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01893.x.
[19]
Johnson, M. The Meaning of the Body; The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2007.
[20]
Thelen, E.; Smith, L.B. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1994.
[21]
Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, 1st ed.; De Vega, M., Glenberg, A.G., Graesser, A.G., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
[22]
Binder, R.J.; Desai, R.H. The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15, 527–536, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001.
[23]
From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics; Hampe, B., Ed.; Mouton de Gruyter: New York, NY, USA, 2005.
[24]
Varela, F.J.; Thomson, E.; Rosch, E. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1991.
[25]
Hogenson, G.B. Archetypes as action patterns. J. Anal. Psychol. 2009, 54, 325–337, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01783.x.
[26]
Hogenson, G.B. The Self, the symbolic and synchronicity: Virtual realities and the emergence of the psyche. J. Anal. Psychol. 2005, 50, 271–284, doi:10.1111/j.0021-8774.2005.00531.x.
[27]
Saunders, P.; Skar, P. Archetypes, complexes and self-organization. J. Anal. Psychol. 2001, 46, 305–323.
[28]
McDowell, M.J. Principle of organization: A dynamic-systems view of the archetype-as-such. J. Anal. Psychol. 2001, 46, 637–654.
[29]
Van Eewynk, J.R. Archetypes: The strange attractors of the psyche. J. Anal. Psychol. 1991, 36, 1–25, doi:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1991.00001.x.
[30]
Van Eewynk, J.R. Archetypes and Strange Attractors: The Chaotic World of Symbols; Inner City Books: Toronto, Canada, 1997.
[31]
Rosen, D.H.; Mascaro, N.; Arnau, R.; Escamilla, M.; Tai-Seale, M.; Ficht, A.; Sanders, C.; Henderson, P.; Hoang, U.; Stevenson, K. Depression in medical students: Gene-environment interactions. Ann. Behav. Sci. Med. Educ. 2010, 16, 8–14.
[32]
Hogenson, G.B. The Baldwin effect: A neglected influence on C. G. Jung’s evolutionary thinking. J. Anal. Psychol. 2001, 46, 591–611.
[33]
Rosen, D.H. Inborn basis for the doctor-patient relationship. Pharos 1992, 55, 17–21.
[34]
Remark added following suggestion by a reviewer of the article.
[35]
Pietikainen, P. Archetypes as symbolic forms. J. Anal. Psychol. 1998, 43, 325–343.
[36]
Haule, J.R. Jung in the 21st Century: Evolution and Archetype, 1st ed. ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2010; Volume 1.
[37]
Stevens, A. Archetype Revisited: An Updated Natural History of the Self; Inner City Books: Toronto, Canada, 2003.
[38]
Goodwyn, E. Approaching archetypes: Reconsidering innateness. J. Anal. Psychol. 2010, 55, 502–521, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01862.x.
[39]
Spelke, E. Innateness, Choice and Language. In Chomsky Notebook; Frank, J., Bricmont, J., Eds.; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 203–210.
[40]
Izard, V.; Sann, C.; Spelke, E.S.; Streri, A. Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 6, 10382–10385.
[41]
Hameroff, S.; Penrose, R. Conscious events as orchestrated space-time selections. NeuroQuantology 2003, I, 10–35.
[42]
Satinover, J. The Quantum Brain: The Search for Freedom and the Next Generation of Man; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2001.
[43]
Beauregard, M. Neuroscience and Spirituality—Findings and Consequences. In Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality; Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Jonas, W.B., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 57–74.
[44]
Jung, C.G. Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. In The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, 2nd ed.; Read, H., Fordham, M., Adler, G., McGuire, W., Eds.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1969; Volume 8.
[45]
Huston, H.L.; Rosen, D.H.; Smith, S.M. Evolutionary Memory. In Evolution of the Psyche; Rosen, D.H., Luebbert, D.C., Eds.; Praeger: Westport, CT, USA, 1999; pp. 139–149.
[46]
Koriat, A.; Bjork, R.A. Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 2005, 31, 187–194, doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.187.
[47]
Thomson, D.M.; Tulving, E. Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. J. Exp. Psychol. 1970, 86, 255–262, doi:10.1037/h0029997.
[48]
Gordon, J. Comment on paper by David H. Rosen et al.. J. Anal. Psychol. 1991, 36, 229, doi:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1991.00229.x.
[49]
Jones, R. On innateness: A response to Hogenson. J. Anal. Psychol. 2003, 48, 705–718, doi:10.1111/1465-5922.00429.
[50]
The Archetypal Symbol Inventory (ASI) is published in the article of Rosen et al. See: [2].
[51]
Hunt, H.T. A collective unconscious reconsidered: Jung’s archetypal imagination in the light of contemporary psychology and social science. J. Anal. Psychol. 2012, 57, 76–98, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01952.x.
[52]
Wilson, M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon. B. Rev. 2002, 9, 625–636, doi:10.3758/BF03196322.
[53]
Fischer, M.H. A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied and situated numerical cognition. Cogn. Process. 2012, 13, 161–164, doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0477-5.
[54]
Bechtel, P. The Effect of Complex Stimulus Words Determined by Means of the Word Association Test on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging; C. G. Jung Institute: Zürich, Switzerland, 2013.
