Wet deposition of mercury (Hg) across the United States is influenced by changes in atmospheric conditions, domestic emissions and global background emissions. We examine trends in Hg precipitation concentrations at 47 Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) sites during 2004–2010 by using the GEOS-Chem nested-grid Hg simulation. We run the model with constant anthropogenic emissions and subtract the model results from the observations. This helps to remove the variability in observed Hg concentrations caused by meteorological factors, including precipitation. We find significant decreasing trends in Hg concentrations in precipitation at MDN sites in the Northeast (？4.1？±？0.49%？yr ？1) and Midwest (？2.7？±？0.68%？y r？1). Over the Southeast (？0.53 ±？0.59%？yr ？1), trends are weaker and not significant, while over the West, trends are highly variable. We conduct model simulations assuming a 45% decrease in Hg emissions from domestic sources in the modeled period and a uniform 12% decrease in background atmospheric Hg concentrations. The combination of domestic emission reductions and decreasing background concentrations explains the observed trends over the Northeast and Midwest, with domestic emission reductions accounting for 58–46% of the decreasing trends. Over the Southeast, we overestimate the observed decreasing trend, indicating potential issues with our assumption of uniformly decreasing background Hg concentrations.
References
[1]
The Original List of Hazardous Air Pollutants. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/188polls.html (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[2]
Mason, R.A. Mercury Emissions from Natural Processes and their Importance in the Global Mercury Cycle. In Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Emissions, Measurements and Models; Pirrone, N., Mason, R.A., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 173–191.
[3]
Streets, D.G.; Devane, M.K.; Lu, Z.; Bond, T.C.; Sunderland, E.M.; Jacob, D.J. All-time releases of mercury to the atmosphere from human activities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 10485–10491.
[4]
Pirrone, N.; Cinnirella, S.; Feng, X.; Finkelman, R.B.; Friedli, H.R.; Learner, J.; Mason, R.; Mukherjee, A.B.; Stracher, G.; Streets, D.G.; Telmer, K. Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from natural and anthropogenic sources. In Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Emissions, Measurements and Models; Pirrone, N., Mason, R.A., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 3–50.
[5]
Selin, N.E. Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: A review. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2009, 34, 43–63, doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084314.
[6]
Holmes, C.D.; Jacob, D.J.; Yang, X. Global lifetime of elemental mercury against oxidation by atomic bromine in the free troposphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009, 33, L20808, doi:10.1029/2006GL027176.
[7]
Clarkson, T.W. The three modern faces of mercury. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 11–23, doi:10.1289/ehp.02110s111.
[8]
Mergler, D.; Anderson, H.A.; Chan, L.H.M.; Mahaffey, K.R.; Murray, M.; Sakamoto, M.; Stern, A.H. Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans: A worldwide concern. Ambio 2007, 36, 3–11, doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[3:MEAHEI]2.0.CO;2.
[9]
Houyoux, M.; Strum, M. Memorandum: Emissions Overview: Hazardous Air Pollutants in Support of the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standard; EPA-454/R-11-014; Emission Inventory and Analysis Group Air Quality Assessment Division: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2011.
[10]
Seigneur, C.; Vijayaraghavan, K.; Lohman, K.; Karamchandani, P.; Scott, C. Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 555–569, doi:10.1021/es034109t.
[11]
Selin, N.E.; Jacob, D.J. Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet deposition in the United States: Constraints on the contribution from North American anthropogenic sources. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 5193–5204, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.069.
[12]
Zhang, Y.; Jaeglé, L.; van Donkelaar, A.; Martin, R.V.; Holmes, C.D.; Amos, H.M.; Wang, Q.; Talbot, R.; Artz, R.; Brooks, S.; et al. Nested-grid simulation of mercury over North America. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 6095–6111, doi:10.5194/acp-12-6095-2012.
[13]
Edgerton, E.S.; Hartsell, B.E.; Jansen, J.J. Mercury speciation in coal-fired power plant plumes observed at three surface sites in the southeastern US. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4563–4570, doi:10.1021/es0515607.
[14]
Weiss-Penzias, P.S.; Gustin, M.S.; Lyman, S.N. Sources of gaseous oxidized mercury and mercury dry deposition at two southeastern U.S. sites. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 4569–4579, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.069.
[15]
Toxics Release Inventory. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/tri/ (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[16]
National Toxics Inventory. Available online: http://epa.gov/air/data/netemis.html (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[17]
National Emission Inventory. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2008inventory.html (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[18]
Solid Waste Combustion Rule. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/airtoxics/129/gil2.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[19]
Clean Air Mercury Rule. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/camr/ (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[20]
Information Collection Request. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/utility/utilitypg.html (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[21]
Mercury and Air Toxics Standard. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/mats (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[22]
Integrated Planning Model. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/epa-ipm/index.html (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[23]
USEPA. Emissions Inventory and Emissions Processing for the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR); Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2005.
[24]
Butler, T.J.; Cohen, M.D.; Vermeylen, F.M.; Likens, G.E.; Schmeltz, D.; Artz, R.S. Regional precipitation mercury trends in the eastern USA, 1998–2005: Declines in the Northeast and Midwest, no trend in the Southeast. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 1582–1592, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.084.
[25]
Prestbo, E.M.; Gay, D.A. Wet deposition of mercury in the US and Canada, 1996–2005: Results and analysis of the NADP mercury deposition network (MDN). Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 4223–4233, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.028.
[26]
Risch, M.R.; Gay, D.A.; Fowler, K.K.; Keeler, G.J.; Backus, S.M.; Blanchard, P.; Barres, J.A.; Dvonch, J.T. Spatial patterns and temporal trends in mercury concentrations, precipitation depths, and mercury wet deposition in the North American Great Lakes region, 2002–2008. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 161, 261–271, doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.05.030.
[27]
Gratz, L.E.; Keeler, G.J.; Miller, E.K. Long-term relationships between mercury wet deposition and meteorology. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 6218–6229, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.040.
[28]
Vijayaraghavan, K.; Stoeckenius, T.; Ma, L.; Yarwood, G.; Morris, R.; Levin, L. Analysis of Temporal Trends in Mercury Emissions and Deposition in Florida. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mercury as Global Pollutant, Halifax, NS, Canada, August 2011.
[29]
Landis, M.S.; Vette, A.F.; Keeler, G.J. Atmospheric mercury in the Lake Michigan Basin: influence of the Chicago/Gary urban area. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4508–4517, doi:10.1021/es011216j.
[30]
Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; Streets, D.G.; Hao, J.; Chan, M.; Jiang, J. Trends in Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions in China from 1995 to 2003. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5312–5318, doi:10.1021/es060406x.
[31]
Streets, D.G.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, Y. Projections of Global Mercury Emissions in 2050. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 2983–2988, doi:10.1021/es802474j.
[32]
Tian, H.; Wang, Y.; Xue, Z.; Qu, Y.; Chai, F.; Hao, J. Atmospheric emissions estimation of Hg, As, and Se from coal-fired power plants in China, 2007. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 3078–3081, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.039.
[33]
Temme, C.; Blanchard, P.; Steffen, A.; Banic, C.; Beauchamp, S.; Poissant, L.; Tordon, R.; Wiens, B. Trend, seasonal and multivariate analysis study of total gaseous mercury data from the Canadian atmospheric mercury measurement network (CAMNet). Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 5423–5441, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.02.021.
[34]
Cole, A.S.; Steffen, A.; Pfaffhuber, K.A.; Berg, T.; Pilote, M.; Poissant, L.; Tordon, R.; Hung, H. Ten-year trends of atmospheric mercury in the high Arctic compared to Canadian sub-Arctic and mid-latitude sites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 1535–1545, doi:10.5194/acp-13-1535-2013.
[35]
Slemr, F.; Brunke, E.G.; Ebinghaus, R.; Kuss, J. Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1995. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 4779–4787, doi:10.5194/acp-11-4779-2011.
[36]
Soerensen, A.L.; Jacob, D.J.; Streets, D.G.; Witt, M.L.I.; Ebinghaus, R.; Mason, R.P.; Andersson, M.; Sunderland, E.M. Multi-decadal decline of mercury in the North Atlantic atmosphere explained by changing subsurface seawater concentrations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39, L21810.
[37]
National Atmospheric Deposition Program, Mercury Deposition Network Information. Available online: http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/mdn/ (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[38]
Bey, I.; Jacob, D.J.; Yantosca, R.M.; Logan, J.A.; Field, B.D.; Fiore, A. M.; Li, Q.B.; Liu, H.G.Y.; Mickley, L.J.; Schultz, M.G. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2001, 106, 23073–23095, doi:10.1029/2001JD000807.
[39]
Selin, N.E.; Jacob, D.J.; Park, R.J.; Yantosca, R.M.; Strode, S.; Jaegle, L.; Jaffe, D. Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury: Global constraints from observations. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112, D02308.
[40]
Holmes, C.D.; Jacob, D.J.; Corbitt, E.S.; Mao, J.; Yang, X.; Talbot, R.; Slemr, F. Global atmospheric model for mercury including oxidation by bromine atoms. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 12037–12057, doi:10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010.
[41]
Amos, H.M.; Jacob, D.J.; Holmes, C.D.; Fisher, J.A.; Wang, Q.; Yantosca, R.M.; Corbitt, E.S.; Galarneau, E.; Rutter, A.P.; Gustin, M.S.; et al. Gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric Hg(II) and its effect on global mercury deposition. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 591–603, doi:10.5194/acp-12-591-2012.
[42]
Donohoue, D.L.; Bauer, D.; Cossairt, B.; Hynes, A.J. Temperature and pressure dependent rate coefficients for the reaction of Hg with Br and the reaction of Br with Br: A pulsed laser photolysis-pulsed laser induced fluorescence study. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 6623–6632.
[43]
Goodsite, M.E.; Plane, J.M.C.; Skov, H. A theoretical study of the oxidation of Hg0 to HgBr2 in the troposphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 1772–1776, doi:10.1021/es034680s.
[44]
Balabanov, N.B.; Shepler, B.C.; Peterson, K.A. Accurate global potential energy surface and reaction dynamics for the ground state of HgBr2. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 8765–8773.
[45]
Pacyna, E.G.; Pacyna, J.M.; Sundseth, K.; Munthe, J.; KinNHom, K.; Wilson, S.; Steenhuisen, F.; Maxson, P. Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 2487–2499, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.009.
[46]
National Pollutant Release Inventory. Available online: http://www.ec.gc.ca/inrp-npri/ (accessed on 13 March 2013).
[47]
Soerensen, A.L.; Sunderland, E.M.; Holmes, C.D.; Jacob, D.J.; Yantosca, R.M.; Skov, H.; Christensen, J.H.; Strode, S.A.; Mason, R.P. An Improved Global Model for Air-Sea Exchange of Mercury: High Concentrations over the North Atlantic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 8574–8580.
[48]
Liu, H.; Jacob, D.; Bey, I.; Yantosca, R.M. Constraints from Pb210 and Be7 on wet deposition and transport in a global three-dimensional chemical tracer model driven by assimilated meteorological fields. J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106, 12109–12128.
[49]
Wang, Q.; Jacob, D.J.; Fisher, J.A.; Mao, J.; Leibensperger, E.M.; Carouge, C.C.; Le Sager, P.; Kondo, Y.; Jimenez, J.L.; Cubison, M.J.; Doherty, S.J. Sources of carbonaceous aerosols and deposited black carbon in the Arctic in winter-spring: implications for radiative forcing. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 12453–12473.
[50]
Wesely, M.L. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical-models. Atmos. Environ. 1989, 23, 1293–1304.
[51]
Holmes, C.D.; Jacob, D.J.; Mason, R.P.; Jaffe, D.A. Sources and deposition of reactive gaseous mercury in the marine atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 2278–2285.
[52]
Guentzel, J.L.; Landing, W.M.; Gill, G.A.; Pollman, C.D. Processes influencing rainfall deposition of mercury in Florida: The FAMS Project (1992–1996). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 863–873, doi:10.1021/es001523+.
[53]
Hoyer, M.; Burke, J.; Keeler, G.J. Atmospheric sources, transport and deposition of mercury in Michigan: two years if event precipitation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1995, 80, 199–208, doi:10.1007/BF01189668.
[54]
Landis, M.S.; Keeler, G.J. Atmospheric Mercury Deposition to Lake Michigan during the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4518–4524, doi:10.1021/es011217b.
[55]
Dvonch, J.T.; Keeler, G.J.; Marsik, F.J. The influence of meteorological conditions on the wet deposition of mercury in southern Florida. J. Appl. Meteorol. 2005, 44, 1421–1435, doi:10.1175/JAM2272.1.
[56]
Strode, S.A.; Jaeglé, L.; Jaffe, D.A.; Swartzendruber, P.C.; Selin, N.E.; Holmes, C.; Yantosca, R.M. Trans-Pacific transport of mercury. J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113, D15305, doi:10.1029/2007JD009428.
[57]
Wright, W.G.; Nydick, K. Sources of Atmospheric Mercury Concentrations and Wet Deposition at Mesa Verde National Park, Southwestern Colorado, 2002–08; Mountain Studies Institute Report: Silverton, CO, USA, 2010.
