全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Automated Determination of Bone Age in a Modern Chinese Population

DOI: 10.5402/2013/874570

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Rationale and Objective. Large studies have previously been performed to set up a Chinese bone age reference, but it has been difficult to compare the maturation of Chinese children with populations elsewhere due to the potential variability between raters in different parts of the world. We re-analysed the radiographs from a large study of normal Chinese children using an automated bone age rating method to establish a Chinese bone age reference, and to compare the tempo of maturation in the Chinese with other populations. Materials and Methods. X-rays from 2883 boys and 3143 girls aged 2–20 years from five Chinese cities, taken in 2005, were evaluated using the BoneXpert automated method. Results. Chinese children reached full maturity at the same age as previously studied Asian children from Los Angeles, but 0.6 years earlier than Caucasian children in Los Angeles. The Greulich-Pyle bone age method was adapted to the Chinese population creating a new bone age scale BX-China05. The standard deviation between BX-China05 and chronologic age was 1.01 years in boys aged 8–14, and 1.08 years in girls aged 7–12. Conclusion. By eliminating rater variability, the automated method provides a reliable and efficient standard for bone age determination in China. 1. Introduction Globalization is not a new trend in auxology. For decades, researchers have compared growth and maturation in populations across the world, exploring racial and regional differences and studying the effects of changes in lifestyle. In particular, there has been a longstanding interest in the differences in tempo of maturation among populations and their secular trend. Such studies have preferentially been performed using bone age (BA) determinations. Unlike secondary sexual characteristics, BA can reveal the entire course of maturation from birth to adulthood. However, bone age rating is associated with considerable operator variability, and it is particularly difficult to ensure consistency between raters from widely separated parts of the world. The emergence of a fully automated and therefore rater-independent BA rating method [1] has the potential to overcome this problem and, thereby, revitalize comparative studies of maturation across the world. We present a reanalysis of a large study of hand radiographs involving modern, normal Chinese children using this automated bone age system. The study could also have considerable impact on clinical practice in China. Due to the one-child policy, parents have a strong focus on growth and development of their child, and currently, there are

References

[1]  H. H. Thodberg, “An automated method for determination of bone age,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 2239–2244, 2009.
[2]  J. M. Tanner, M. J. R. Healy, H. Goldstein, and N. Cameron, Assessment of Skeletal Maturity and Prediction of Adult Height (TW3 Method), WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2001.
[3]  W. W. Greulich and S. I. Pyle, Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1959.
[4]  S. Y. Zhang, L. J. Liu, Z. L. Wu et al., “Standards of TW3 skeletal maturity for Chinese children,” Annals of Human Biology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 349–354, 2008.
[5]  H. H. Thodberg, S. Kreiborg, A. Juul, and K. D. Pedersen, “The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 52–66, 2009.
[6]  D. D. Martin, D. Deusch, R. Schweizer, G. Binder, H. H. Thodberg, and M. B. Ranke, “Clinical application of automated Greulich-Pyle bone age determination in children with short stature,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 598–607, 2009.
[7]  R. R. van Rijn, M. H. Lequin, and H. H. Thodberg, “Automatic determination of Greulich and Pyle bone age in healthy Dutch children,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 591–597, 2009.
[8]  D. D. Martin, K. Sato, M. Sato, H. H. Thodberg, and T. Tanaka, “Validation of a new method for automated determination of bone age in Japanese children,” Hormone Research in Paediatrics, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 398–404, 2010.
[9]  H. H. Thodberg and L. S?vendahl, “Validation and reference values of automated bone age determination for four ethnicities,” Academic Radiology, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1425–1432, 2010.
[10]  H. H. Thodberg, O. G. Jenni, M. B. Ranke, and D. D. Martin, “Standardisation of the Tanner-Whitehouse bone age method in the context of automated image analysis,” Annals of Human Biology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 68–75, 2012.
[11]  G. Beunen and N. Cameron, “The reproducibility of TW2 skeletal age assessments by a self-taught assessor,” Annals of Human Biology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 1980.
[12]  K. Ashizawa, C. Kumakura, X. Zhou, F. Jin, and J. Cao, “RUS skeletal maturity of children in Beijing,” Annals of Human Biology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 316–325, 2005.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133