全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Risk Perception and Its Foundation among Swedish Individuals Occupationally Exposed to Air Pollutants and Chemicals: A Comparison of 1975 and 2011

DOI: 10.1155/2013/469714

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Although work environment conditions have improved much in the last decades, occupational exposures to chemicals and air pollutants still cause adverse health effects. The risk perception of occupational exposures to hazardous substances and the motivations for it have been investigated through a questionnaire study. These results have also been compared to previous studies performed by the largest trade union confederation in Sweden in 1975. In the current survey, 30% of the respondents believe to be at risk, 48% not, and 22% state to be unsure. The proportion of persons experiencing to be at risk due to exposures to chemicals or air pollution at work is unexpectedly similar to that of 1975. The explanations offered for the risk perception were in many cases vague and of a subjective nature, but again results are similar to those of 1975. References to more solid justifications such as performed exposure measurements or medical health checks are scarce, with the latter case being as scarce today as in 1975. There are only a few indications that a more systematic management of work environment issues has developed at Swedish workplaces; for instance, managers were more commonly stated as a source of information in 2011 than in 1975. 1. Introduction Working conditions have a major impact on public health and welfare. In Sweden, occupational diseases are estimated to cause at least 1000 fatalities per year [1]. Although the work environment in Sweden has gone through major improvements from a physicochemical perspective during the past forty years [2], exposure to hazardous air pollution should not be considered an issue of the past. Statistics are available on the percentage of employed Swedes stating to be exposed to air pollutants, defined as palpable dust or chemicals, during at least 1/4th of their time at work since 1997. The percentages are quite stable; in 1997, 23% of the workforce stated to be exposed at least 1/4th of their time at work [3]; in 2011, the corresponding number was 22% [4]. The highest level during this period, 24%, was recorded in 2007 [5]. As there are approximately 4.5 million workers in Sweden, this can be expressed as close to one million Swedes are exposed to air pollutants at work for at least a 1/4th of their working time. A survney performed in spring 2010 indicated that 0.5% of the employed women and 0.4% of the employed men had experienced work-related disorders due to chemical exposures during the last twelve months [6]. Individuals’ risk perception and the foundations for that belief are important targets for

References

[1]  B. J?rvholm, “Arbetsrelaterade d?dsfall i Sverige [Work-related fatalities in Sweden],” Swedish Work Environment Authority, 2010:3, 2010.
[2]  K. Frick, “The regulation of systematic work environment management in Sweden—higher ambitions in a weaker Swedish work environment system,” in RegulatIng Workplace Risks, pp. 115–140, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.
[3]  Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen and Statistics Sweden, “Arbetsmilj?n 1999 [The Work Environment 1999] Statistiska meddelanden AM 68 SM 0001”.
[4]  Swedish Work Environment Authority, “Arbetsmilj?n 2011 [The Work Environment 2011] Report 2012:4”.
[5]  Swedish Work Environment Authority, “Arbetsmilj?n 2007 [The Work Environment 2007] Work environment statistics Report 2008:4”.
[6]  Swedish Work Environment Authority, “Work-realted disorders 2010,” Swedish Work Environment Authority, 2010:4, 2010.
[7]  P. M. Arezes and A. S. Miguel, “Risk perception and safety behaviour: A study in an occupational environment,” Safety Science, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 900–907, 2008.
[8]  E. Bolinder, A. Englund, and E. Magnusson, “Kemiska h?lsorisker i arbetsmilj?n: en analys baserad p? enk?tunders?kningar bland LO-medlemmar och skyddsombud,” Stockholm: Prisma i samarbete med Landsorganisationen i Sverige, 1976.
[9]  E. Bolinder and Landsorganisationen i Sverige, “Vad h?nder med arbetsmilj?n?: rapport om LO-medlemmarnas och skyddsombudens erfarenheter,” Stockholm: Landsorganisationen: Tiden, 1981.
[10]  E. Bolinder, E. Magnusson, and L. Nyrén, “Risker i jobbet: LO-enk?ten: LO-medlemmarnas uppfattning om arbetsplatsens h?lsorisker. [Stockholm]: Prisma i samarb.med Landsorganisationen i Sverige,” 1971.
[11]  Swedish Parliament, “Swedish Work Environment Act,” 1977.
[12]  Swedish Work Environment Authority, “Systematiskt Arbetsmilj?arbete [Systematic Work Environment Management],” 2001.
[13]  Swedish Work Environment Authority, “Kemiska Arbetsmilj?risker [Chemical Risks at the Workplace],” AFS 2011:19. Stockholm: Elanders, 2011.
[14]  Swedish Work Environment Authority, “Hygieniska gr?nsv?rden [Occupational Exposure Limits],” 2011.
[15]  S. O. Hansson, Setting the Limit: Occupational Health Standards and the Limits of Science, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
[16]  P. Stephens and Great Britain. Health and Safety Executive., and Vectra Group Limited., Occupational Health and SMEs: Focused Intervention Strategies: Part 1—Overview Report: Part 2—Substantiating Chapters, HSE Books, Sudbury, Canada, 2004.
[17]  P. Wymenga, V. Spanikova, J. Derbyshire, and A. Barker, “Are EU SMEs recovering? Annual Report on EU SMEs 2010/2011,” European Commission, DG-Enterprise, 2011.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133