Objectives. We have investigated the Australian public's perceived risks on human reproductive health from a number of identified environmental hazards. Methods. A sample of 1261 subjects was interviewed. This interview included specific questions related to perceived risks of certain environmental hazards to human reproductive health. Results. Women were almost twice as likely to rank all hazards as harmful or very harmful to human reproduction than men. Age also influenced perceived risk with those in the 35 and older age groups more likely to rank lead as a harmful hazard when compared with the 18–34 group. Pesticides were identified by 84.5% of the sample as the most harmful environmental hazard to human reproduction. Conclusions. Similar to other environmental hazards, different groups of people in the general population perceive hazards relating to reproductive health differently. This information is important for both policy makers and health professionals dealing with reproductive environmental health issues. 1. Introduction Environmental health is an area of growing concern due to major global environmental changes and an increase in established links between a number of diseases and environmental exposures. Children and the developing fetus are known to be particularly vulnerable to the impact of environmental pollution [1] and as such, the European Environment Agency (EEA) [2] and the World Health Organisation (WHO) [3] have highlighted this as a high priority which warrants further research. Established risks for the fetus that relate to life circumstances and so-called lifestyle factors include smoking and second hand smoke, alcohol and other licit and nonlicit drugs, and physical exercise linked to factors such as obesity [4, 5]. These might be viewed as “social environmental risk factors” where data are often extensive and research has been conducted in some instances for decades. Greater uncertainty and doubt exist about what could be described as nonpersonal environmental risk factors and their impacts generated not by choices but by activities external to and usually beyond the control of individuals. These are the focus of our paper. They may also often involve complex inter-actions and long-term, low-level exposures and reviews flag both the established risks and new potential hazards during pregnancy that may involve a range of environmental factors. The effects of exposure to environmental toxins especially for pregnant women were propelled into the public domain in the 1960s with events such as the poisoning of Minamata Bay by
References
[1]
R. R. Dietert, “Developmental immunotoxicology: focus on health risks,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2009.
[2]
European Environment Agency, Environment and Health, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005.
[3]
WHO Regional Office for Europe, Children's Environment and Health Action Plan for Europe, www.euro.who.int/—data/assets/pdf_file/0006/78639/E83338.pdf 2004 (last accessed 04/2011).
[4]
D. T. Wigle, T. E. Arbuckle, M. C. Turner et al., “Epidemiologic evidence of relationships between reproductive and child health outcomes and environmental chemical contaminants,” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health—Part B: Critical Reviews, vol. 11, no. 5-6, pp. 373–517, 2008.
[5]
A. M. N. Andersen and J. Olsen, “The Danish national birth cohort: selected scientific contributions within perinatal epidemiology and future perspectives,” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, vol. 39, supplement 7, pp. 115–120, 2011.
[6]
T. Takeuchi, N. Morikawa, H. Matsumoto, and Y. Shiraishi, “A pathological study of Minamata disease in Japan,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 40–57, 1962.
[7]
S. Chalupka, “Environmental health: an opportunity for health promotion and disease prevention,” American Association of Occupational Health Nurses, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 13–28, 2005.
[8]
J. Houlihan, T. Kropp, R. Wiles, S. Gray, and C. Campbell, Body Burden: The Pollution in Newborns, Environmental Working Group, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
[9]
G. Lyons and A. A. Watterson, Review of the Role Pesticides Play in Some Cancers: Children, Farmers and Pesticide Users at Risk?. www.chemtrust.org.uk 2010 (last accessed 04/2011).
[10]
P. Sutton, L. C. Giudice, and T. J. Woodruff, “Reproductive environmental health,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 517–524, 2010.
[11]
K. L. Bassil, C. Vakil, M. Sanborn, D. C. Cole, J. S. Kaur, and K. J. Kerr, “Cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review,” Canadian Family Physician, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1705–1711, 2007.
[12]
M. Sanborn, K. J. Kerr, L. H. Sanin, D. C. Cole, K. L. Bassil, and C. Vakil, “Non-cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review and implications for family doctors,” Canadian Family Physician, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1712–1720, 2007.
[13]
M. C. Turner, D. T. Wigle, and D. Krewski, “Residential pesticides and childhood leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2010.
[14]
G. van Maele-Fabry, A. C. Lantin, P. Hoet, and D. Lison, “Childhood leukaemia and parental occupational exposure to pesticides: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 787–809, 2010.
[15]
M. Maisonet, A. Correa, D. Misra, and J. J. Jaakkola, “A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air pollution on fetal growth,” Environmental Research, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 106–115, 2004.
[16]
R. J. Sram, B. Binkova, J. Dejmek, and M. Bobak, “Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 375–382, 2005.
[17]
S. V. Glinianaia, J. Rankin, R. Bell, T. Pless-Mulloli, and D. Howel, “Particulate air pollution and fetal health: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence,” Epidemiology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2004.
[18]
I. Annesi-Maesano, U. Ackermann, C. Boudet et al., “Health effects of atmospheric particles: review of the epidemiologic studies,” Environnement, Risques et Sante, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 2004.
[19]
N. Ribas-Fitó, M. Sala, M. Kogevinas, and J. Sunyer, “Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and neurological development in children: a systematic review,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 537–546, 2001.
[20]
I. Calvente, M. F. Fernandez, J. Villalba, N. Olea, and M. I. Nu？ez, “Exposure to electromagnetic fields (non-ionizing radiation) and its relationship with childhood leukemia: a systematic review,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 408, no. 16, pp. 3062–3069, 2010.
[21]
J. R. Jauchem, “Effects of low-level radio-frequency (3？kHz to 300？GHz) energy on human cardiovascular, reproductive, immune, and other systems: a review of the recent literature,” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 211, no. 1-2, pp. 1–29, 2008.
[22]
J. F. I. Tortajada, J. A. O. García, J. A. L. Andreu, O. B. Tornero, A. M. Macián, and J. G. I. Castell, “Parental tobacco smoke and childhood cancer,” Revista Espanola de Pediatria, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 225–236, 2004.
[23]
A. J. Idrovo and L. H. Sanin, “Adverse reproductive outcomes among women working in colombian floriculture: a summary of the evidence through meta-analysis,” Biomedica, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 490–497, 2007.
[24]
D. M. Manassaram, L. C. Backer, and D. M. Moll, “A review of nitrates in drinking water: maternal exposure and adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 320–327, 2006.
[25]
A. D. Ngo, R. Taylor, C. L. Roberts, and T. V. Nguyen, “Association between agent orange and birth defects: systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1220–1230, 2006.
[26]
C. Peters, M. Harling, M. Dulon, A. Schablon, J. T. Costa, and A. Nienhaus, “Fertility disorders and pregnancy complications in hairdressers—a systematic review,” Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, vol. 5, no. 24, 2010.
[27]
A. Schultze-Mosgau, G. Griesinger, C. Altgassen, S. von Otte, D. Hornung, and K. Diedrich, “New developments in the use of peptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists versus agonists,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1085–1097, 2005.
[28]
M. P. Little and R. Wakeford, “Systematic review of epidemiological studies of exposure to tritium,” Journal of Radiological Protection, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 9–32, 2008.
[29]
A. C. Vidaeff and L. E. Sever, “In utero exposure to environmental estrogens and male reproductive health: a systematic review of biological and epidemiologic evidence,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 2005.
[30]
J. H. G. Williams and L. Ross, “Consequences of prenatal toxin exposure for mental health in children and adolescents: a systematic review,” European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 243–253, 2007.
[31]
R. Schulze-Rath, G. P. Hammer, and M. Blettner, “Are pre- or postnatal diagnostic X-rays a risk factor for childhood cancer? a systematic review,” Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 301–312, 2008.
[32]
A. Petersen and D. Lupton, The New Public Health. Health and Self in the Age of Risk, Sage, Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
[33]
D. Lupton, The Imperative of Health. Public Health and the Regulated Body, Sage, Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
[34]
U. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
[35]
M. Douglas, Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory, Routeledge, London, UK, 1992.
[36]
P. Slovic, “Public perception of risk,” Journal of Environmental Health, vol. 59, pp. 22–23, 1997.
[37]
H. A. Grason and D. P. Misra, “Reducing exposure to environmental toxicants before birth: moving from risk perception to risk reduction,” Public Health Reports, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 629–641, 2009.
[38]
A. Watterson, P. Thomson, C. Malcolm, A. Shepherd, and C. McIntosh, “Integrating environmental health into nursing and midwifery practice,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 665–674, 2005.
[39]
R. Etzel and S. J. Balk, Eds., Pediatric Environmental Health, 2nd edition, 2003.
[40]
D. G. Shendell and A. Pike-Paris, “Environmental exposure assessment, pollution sources, and exposure agents: a primer for pediatric nursing professionals,” Pediatric Nursing, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 179–182, 2007.
[41]
E. Babbie, The Practice of Social Research, International Thomson, London, UK, 1989.
[42]
G. Starr, A. Langley, and A. Taylor, Environmental Health Risk Perception in Australia : A Research Report to the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, Department of Human Services, Adelaide, Australia, 2000.
[43]
P. Solvic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, “Facts and fears: undertanding perceived risk,” in Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough? R. C. Schwing and W. A. Albers, Eds., pp. 181–214, Plenum, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
[44]
World Health Organisation, World Health Report 2002. Perceiving Risks, chapter 3, World Health Organisation, City, State, USA, 2003.
[45]
R. O'Neil, Dangerous Lead. http://www.hazards.org/lead/ 2009 (last accessed 04/2011).
[46]
W. A. Crofting, Health and the Environment Report, Stirling University, Scotland, UK, 2010.
[47]
D. C. Kovacs, M. J. Small, C. I. Davidson, and B. Fischhoff, “Behavioral factors affecting exposure potential for household cleaning products,” Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 505–520, 1997.
[48]
R. P. Barke, H. Jenkins-Smith, and P. Slovic, “Risk perceptions of men and women scientists,” Social Science Quarterly, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 167–176, 1997.
[49]
D. J. Davidson and W. R. Freudenburg, “Gender and environmental risk concerns: a review and analysis of available research,” Environment and Behavior, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 302–339, 1996.
[50]
D. W. Pennay and N. Bishop, Profiling the “Mobile Phone Only” Population: A Study of Australians with a Mobile Phone and No Landline Telephone, Social Research Centre Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia, 2009.
[51]
R. Curtin, S. Presser, and E. Singer, “Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2005.
[52]
J. O'Toole, M. Sinclair, and K. Leder, “Maximising response rates in household telephone surveys,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 8, no. 71, 2008.
