全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery with Antrostomy Has Better Early Endoscopic Recovery in Comparison to the Ostium-Preserving Technique

DOI: 10.5402/2012/189383

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background. Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is considered for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) after failure of conservative therapy. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate endoscopically ostium patency and mucosal recovery after ESS, with either maxillary sinus ostium-preserving or -enlarging techniques. Materials and Methods. Thirty patients with non-polypous CRS were enrolled. Uncinectomy-only and additional middle meatal antrostomy were randomly and single-blindly performed for each side. Pre- and postoperative endoscopic scores were semi-quantitatively determined according to findings in the ostiomeatal complex area. Adhesions, maxillary sinus mucosal swelling, secretions, and ostium obstruction were also endoscopically evaluated. In addition, symptoms were asked and computed tomography scans were taken preoperatively and 9 months postoperatively. Results. At 16 days postoperatively, a better endoscopic score and a less obstructed ostium were found with antrosomy. At 9 months postoperatively the endoscopic score improved significantly and identically with both procedures, however, obstructed ostia and sinus mucosal swelling/secretions were insignificantly more frequently found on the uncinectomy-only side. Endoscopic and radiologic findings of the maxillary sinus mucosa and ostium correlated significantly 9 months postoperatively. Conclusion. There was a good long-term mucosal recovery with both surgical procedures. In terms of early mucosal recovery and ostium patency, antrostomy might be slighly superior. 1. Introduction Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammation of the nose and paranasal sinuses lasting more than 12 weeks with a prevalence of about 10% in Europe [1, 2]. It is diagnosed by typical symptoms and/or computed tomography (CT) scan and/or endoscopic changes [1]. After failure of conservative therapy, endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) aims to restore mucociliary clearance and ventilation through the natural ostia. ESS is based on the theory that the maxillary sinus ostium is the most important area in the pathogenesis of chronic and recurrent rhinosinusitis [3, 4]. Obstruction of the ostium is believed to lead to chronic inflammation and eventually to pathologic alterations of the maxillary sinus mucosa. Therefore, surgical opening of the ostium and thus improved drainage and ventilation of the sinus might restore the normal mucosa [5]. There are different opinions concerning the extent of surgery of the ostiomeatal complex. It is considered that removal of the uncinate process alone would be enough to restore the ventilation of

References

[1]  W. J. Fokkens, V. Lund, and J. Mullol, “European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007,” Rhinology, vol. 45, no. 20, pp. 1–136, 2007.
[2]  D. Hastan, W. J. Fokkens, C. Bachert et al., “Chronic rhinosinusitis in Europe—an underestimated disease. A GA 2LEN study,” Allergy, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 1216–1223, 2011.
[3]  W. Messerklinger, “Endoscopy of the nose,” Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol, vol. 104, pp. 451–456, 1970.
[4]  H. Stammberger, “Endoscopic endonasal surgery—concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part I. Anatomic and pathophysiologic considerations,” Otolaryngology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 143–147, 1986.
[5]  D. W. Kennedy, “Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: technique,” Archives of Otolaryngology, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 643–649, 1985.
[6]  P. J. Catalano, “Minimally invasive sinus technique: What is it? Should we consider it?” Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 34–37, 2004.
[7]  R. C. Setliff III, “Minimally invasive sinus surgery: the rationale and the technique,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 115–129, 1996.
[8]  P. Catalano and E. Roffman, “Outcome in patients with chronic sinusitis afte the minimally invasive sinus technique,” American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2003.
[9]  N. Salama, R. J. Oakley, C. J. Skilbeck, N. Choudhury, and A. Jacob, “Benefit from the minimally invasive sinus technique,” Journal of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 186–190, 2009.
[10]  K. C. Welch and J. A. Stankiewicz, “Application of minimally invasive endoscopic sinus surgery techniques,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 565–578, 2010.
[11]  S. Albu and E. Tomescu, “Small and large middle meatus antrostomies in the treatment of chronic maxillary sinusitis,” Otolaryngology, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 542–547, 2004.
[12]  A. Kutluhan, M. ?alviz, K. Bozdemir et al., “The effects of uncinectomy and natural ostial dilatation on maxillary sinus ventilation: a clinical experimental study,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 268, no. 4, pp. 569–573, 2011.
[13]  J. Myller, S. Toppila-Salmi, T. Torkkeli, J. Heikkinen, and M. Rautiainen, “Effect of endoscopic sinus surgery on antral mucociliary clearance,” Rhinology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 193–196, 2006.
[14]  W. Wadwongtham and S. Aeumjaturapat, “Large middle meatal antrostomy vs undisturbed maxillary ostium in the endoscopic sinus surgery of nasal polyposis,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. S373–S378, 2003.
[15]  J. Myller, P. Dastidar, M. Rautiainen, S. Toppila-Salmi, and T. Torkkeli, “Computed tomography findings after endoscopic sinus surgery with preserving or enlarging maxillary sinus ostium surgery,” Rhinology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 438–44, 2011.
[16]  D. Singhal, A. J. Psaltis, A. Foreman, and P. J. Wormald, “The impact of biofilms on outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery,” American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 169–174, 2010.
[17]  J. D. Suh, V. Ramakrishnan, and J. N. Palmer, “Biofilms,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 521–530, 2010.
[18]  V. J. Lund and I. S. Mackay, “Staging in rhinosinusitus,” Rhinology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 183–184, 1993.
[19]  J. P. Myller, S. K. Toppila-Salmi, E. M. Toppila et al., “Mucosal eosinophils and L-selectin ligands are associated with invasive and noninvasive sinus surgery outcomes,” American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2009.
[20]  J. C. Mace, Y. L. Michael, N. E. Carlson, J. R. Litvack, and T. L. Smith, “Correlations between endoscopy score and quality of life changes after sinus surgery,” Archives of Otolaryngology, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 340–346, 2010.
[21]  B. Guo, K. Yuan, F. Zhang, and J. Zhong, “Outcomes and correlation after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis,” Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 344–347, 2010.
[22]  L. Rudmik, Z. M. Soler, R. R. Orlandi, et al., “Early postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based review with recommendations,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 417–430, 2011.
[23]  H. M. Huang, H. P. Lee, C. M. Liu, and K. N. Lin, “Normalization of maxillary sinus mucosa after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in pediatric chronic sinusitis,” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 1219–1223, 2005.
[24]  J. B. Watelet, C. Bachert, P. Gevaert, and P. Van Cauwenberge, “Wound healing of the nasal and paranasal mucosa: a review,” American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 77–84, 2002.
[25]  G. Xu, H. Jiang, H. Li, J. Shi, and H. Chen, “Stages of nasal mucosal transitional course after functional endoscopic sinus surgery and their clinical indications,” ORL, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 118–123, 2008.
[26]  J. B. Watelet, B. Annicq, P. Van Cauwenberge, and C. Bachert, “Objective outcome after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: prediction factors,” Laryngoscope, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 1092–1097, 2004.
[27]  T. L. Smith, P. H. Hwang, A. H. Murr, F. Lavigne, and A. Koreck, “Interrater reliability of endoscopic parameters following sinus surgery,” Laryngoscope, vol. 122, pp. 230–236, 2012.
[28]  S. Nair, “Correlation between symptoms and radiological findings in patients of chronic rhinosinusitis: a modified radiological typing system,” Rhinology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 181–186, 2009.
[29]  Z. Zhang, D. R. Linkin, B. S. Finkelman et al., “Asthma and biofilm-forming bacteria are independently associated with revision sinus surgeries for chronic rhinosinusitis,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 221–223, 2011.
[30]  N. A. Cohen and D. W. Kennedy, “Revision endoscopic sinus surgery,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 417–435, 2006.
[31]  T. Wang, B. Zhou, S. Z. Zhang, E. Z. Fan, H. R. Zang, and Y. Li, “Histolopathologic features of CT scan typing of chronic rhinosinusitis and relation with prognosis,” Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 809–813, 2008.
[32]  C. C. Wu, S. Y. Lee, C. J. Hsu, and T. H. Yeh, “Patients with positive allergen test have less favorable outcome after endoscopic microdebrider-assisted inferior turbinoplasty,” American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 20–23, 2008.
[33]  M. W. Ryan, “Diseases associated with chronic rhinosinusitis: what is the significance?” Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 231–236, 2008.
[34]  S. Robinson, R. Douglas, and P. J. Wormald, “The relationship between atopy and chronic rhinosinusitis,” American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 625–628, 2006.
[35]  T. L. Smith, S. Mendolia-Loffredo, T. A. Loehrl, R. Sparapani, P. W. Laud, and A. B. Nattinger, “Predictive factors and outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis,” Laryngoscope, vol. 115, no. 12, pp. 2199–2205, 2005.
[36]  I. A. Emanuel and S. B. Shah, “Chronic rhinosinusitis: allergy and sinus computed tomography relationships,” Otolaryngology, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 687–691, 2000.
[37]  J. L. Robinson, S. Griest, K. E. James, and T. L. Smith, “Impact of aspirin intolerance on outcomes of sinus surgery,” Laryngoscope, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 825–830, 2007.
[38]  P. Tomassen, R. B. Newson, R. Hoffmans et al., “Reliability of EP3OS symptom criteria and nasal endoscopy in the assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis—a GA2LEN study,” Allergy, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 556–561, 2011.
[39]  W. R. Ryan, T. Ramachandra, and P. H. Hwang, “Correlations between symptoms, nasal endoscopy, and in-office computed tomography in post-surgical chronic rhinosinusitis patients,” Laryngoscope, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 674–678, 2011.
[40]  D. T. Bradley and S. E. Kountakis, “Correlation between computed tomography scores and symptomatic improvement after endoscopic sinus surgery,” Laryngoscope, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 466–469, 2005.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133