全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Comparative Outcomes Assessment: Hip Hemiarthroplasty as an Alternative to THA in Patients with Surgically Pristine Acetabulum—Is There Still a Role?

DOI: 10.1155/2013/632126

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This is a retrospective review of 243 hip arthroplasties treated with either hemiarthroplasty (61 surgeries-Group 1) or total hip arthroplasty (182 surgeries-Group 2). The mid- to long-term results of relatively similar, predominately young patient cohorts were assessed annually via radiographs and the Harris Hip Scores for pain and clinical function. Groin pain persisted in 16.4% of Group 1 and 5.5% of Group 2 ( ). Thigh pain persisted in 11.5% of Group 1 and 2.2% of Group 2 ( ). Complications in Group 1 were 4/61 including 2 revisions with an overall survival rate of 96.7% versus Group 2 complication rate of 29/182 with 15 revisions and an overall survival rate of 91.8%. There were no cases of acetabular protrusio in Group 1, but 2 cases (1%) in Group 2 had cup loosening or osteolysis. Two cases were revised in Group 1 (3.2%). Both were undersized femoral stems. The fifteen revisions (8.2%) in Group 2 included loose stem (1), instability (8), infections (3), cup loosening (2), and accelerated polyethylene wear (1). Hemiarthroplasty has a higher incidence of thigh and groin pain but fewer complications compared with total hip arthroplasty. 1. Introduction The use of hemiarthroplasty was initially advocated for femoral neck fractures. Hemiarthroplasty advocates indicate ease of implantation, reduced blood loss, a lower dislocation rate, and the ease of acetabular revision when compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) [1–3]. Historically, surgeons have advocated the use of hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative arthritis, fracture, or avascular necrosis (AVN) of the hip based primarily on relatively young patient age and the benefit of preserving the acetabular bone stock for future anticipated surgeries. With the availability of newer technologies such as hard on hard bearings (metal on metal, ceramic on ceramic), highly cross-linked polyethylene, and resurfacing arthroplasties, one may consider whether hemiarthroplasty in younger patients is an operation of the past. Many patients needing hip arthroplasty suffer from hip osteonecrosis, often historically referred to as AVN, of the femoral head [4]. The clinical diagnosis of osteonecrosis is often a general one associated with multiple other conditions and with many features of hip osteoarthritis (OA) in its late stages, thus making large patient series difficult to accumulate and even more difficult to compare. Studies such as Wroblewski et al. had a series of 49 patients identified with eleven distinct diagnoses within AVN [5]. There are some longer-term studies of implant

References

[1]  J. E. Bateman, A. R. Berenji, O. Bayne, and N. D. Greyson, “Long-term results of bipolar arthroplasty in osteoarthritis of the hip,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 251, pp. 54–66, 1990.
[2]  K. A. Kindsfater, A. I. Spitzer, J. L. Schaffer, and R. D. Scott, “Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a review of 41 cases with 8 to 10 years of follow-up,” Orthopedics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 425–431, 1998.
[3]  R. Pandit, “Bipolar femoral head arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a prospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up period,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 560–564, 1996.
[4]  E. A. Salvati and C. N. Cornell, “Long-term follow-up of total hip replacement in patients with avascular necrosis,” Instructional Course Lectures, vol. 37, pp. 67–73, 1988.
[5]  B. M. Wroblewski, P. D. Siney, and P. A. Fleming, “Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of the femoral head,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 870–873, 2005.
[6]  M. E. Cabanela, “Bipolar versus total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of the femoral head. A comparison,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 261, pp. 59–62, 1990.
[7]  A. D. Hanssen, M. E. Cabanela, and C. J. Michet Jr., “Hip arthroplasty in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 807–814, 1987.
[8]  K. J. Ravikumar and G. Marsh, “Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur—13 Year results of a prospective randomised study,” Injury, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 793–797, 2000.
[9]  Y. S. Chan and C. H. Shih, “Bipolar versus total hip arthroplasty for hip osteonecrosis in the same patient,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 379, pp. 169–177, 2000.
[10]  B. J. McGrory, S. C. York, R. Iorio et al., “Current practices of AAHKS members in the treatment of adult osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1194–1204, 2007.
[11]  Y. S. Chan and C. H. Shih, “Cementless bipolar endoprosthesis in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head,” Journal of Orthopedic Surgery Taiwan, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 1997.
[12]  M. P. Grevitt and J. D. Spencer, “Avascular necrosis of the hip treated by hemiarthroplasty: results in renal transplant recipients,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 205–212, 1995.
[13]  I. D. Learmonth and M. Opitz, “Treatment of grade III osteonecrosis of the femoral head with a Charnley/Bicentric hemiarthroplasty,” Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 311–314, 1993.
[14]  V. D. Pellegrini Jr., B. A. Heiges, B. Bixler, E. B. Lehman, and C. M. Davis III, “Minimum ten-year results of primary bipolar hip arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the hip,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 1817–1825, 2006.
[15]  Y. H. Kim and J. S. Kim, “Histologic analysis of acetabular and proximal femoral bone in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2471–2474, 2004.
[16]  M. E. Steinberg, A. Corces, and M. Fallon, “Acetabular involvement in osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 60–65, 1999.
[17]  P. G. Bullough, “The morbid anatomy of subchondral osteonecrosis,” in Osteonecrosis: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment, J. R. Urbaniak and J. P. Jones, Eds., pp. 69–72, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Ill, USA, 1997.
[18]  R. P. Ficat and J. Arlet, “Necrosis of the femoral head,” in Ischemia and Necrosis of Bone, D. S. Hungerford, Ed., pp. 53–74, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1980.
[19]  K. A. Kindsfater, A. I. Spitzer, J. L. Schaffer, and R. D. Scott, “Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a review of 41 cases with 8 to 10 years of follow-up,” Orthopedics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 425–431, 1998.
[20]  D. S. Hungerford, “Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Everything's new,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 22, no. 4, supplement, pp. 91–94, 2007.
[21]  T. B. Pace, K. A. Rusaw, L. J. Minette, et al., “Metal-on-metal hip retrieval analysis: a case report,” Case Reports in Orthopedics, vol. 2013, Article ID 398973, 5 pages, 2013.
[22]  R. T. Steffen, N. A. Athanasou, H. S. Gill, and D. W. Murray, “Avascular necrosis associated with fracture of the femoral neck after hip resurfacing: histological assessment of femoral bone from retrieval specimens,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 787–793, 2010.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133