Developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) presents considerable technical challenges to the primary arthroplasty surgeon. Autogenous bulk grafting using the femoral head has been utilised to achieve anatomic cup placement and superolateral bone coverage in these patients, but reported outcomes on this technique have been mixed with the lack of graft integration and subsequent collapse, an early cause of failures. We describe a novel technique combining the use of bulk autograft with an iliac osteotomy, which provides primary stability and direct cancellous-cancellous bone contact, optimising the environment for early osseointegration. Twenty-one hips in 21 patients with DDH underwent this technique and were followed for a mean of 8.1 years. The preoperative radiographic classification was Crowe type I in 12 hips (57%), type II in 4 hips, and type III in 5 hips, and the mean Sharp angle was 49.6° (range 42°–60°). All grafts united by year. At time of followup, there was no radiographic evidence of graft collapse or loosening. There were no reoperations. Our study has shown that this technique variation combining an iliac osteotomy with bulk autograft in cases of developmental hip dysplasia provides early stability and reliable graft incorporation, together with satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in the medium term. Longer term study is necessary to confirm the clinical success of this procedure. 1. Introduction Developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) presents considerable technical challenges to the primary arthroplasty surgeon. Achieving correct positioning of the acetabular component and adequate bone coverage can be difficult. Harris first described the technique of bulk autogenous grafting to achieve superolateral bone coverage in 1977, and while early-to-midterm results were promising [1], longer term outcomes have been mixed. In Harris’s series, 21% of patients had radiographic evidence of loosening at seven years [2], and outcomes at mean sixteen years showed a high rate of acetabular failure due to component loosening and graft collapse [3]. Recently, however, more favourable long-term outcomes have been reported in DDH patients utilizing bulk autografts with both cemented [4–6] and uncemented [7] implants. Achieving union and stability of the autogenous graft have been identified as key determinants of a successful outcome with this technique [8]. Bulk autogenous grafts are known to incorporate slowly and often incompletely, [9] limiting their ability to respond to stresses under cyclic loading. The main factors affecting incorporation of the
References
[1]
W. H. Harris, O. Crothers, and I. Oh, “Total hip replacement and femoral-head bone-grafting for severe acetabular deficiency in adults,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 752–759, 1977.
[2]
S. D. Gerber and W. H. Harris, “Femoral head autografting to augment acetabular deficiency in patients requiring total hip replacement. A minimum five-year and an average seven-year follow-up study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1241–1248, 1986.
[3]
A. A. Shinar and W. H. Harris, “Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty: sixteen-year-average follow-up,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 159–168, 1997.
[4]
H. Iida, Y. Matsusue, K. Kawanabe, H. Okumura, T. Yamamuro, and T. Nakamura, “Cemented total hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone graft for developmental dysplasia: long-term results and survivorship analysis,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. British Volume, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 176–184, 2000.
[5]
S. Inao and T. Matsuno, “Cemented total hip arthroplasty with autogenous acetabular bone grafting for hips with developmental dysplasia in adults,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 375–377, 2000.
[6]
S. Kobayashi, N. Saito, M. Nawata, H. Horiuchi, R. Iorio, and K. Takaoka, “Total hip arthroplasty with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 615–621, 2003.
[7]
C. Hendrich, I. Mehling, U. Sauer, S. Kirschner, and J. M. Martell, “Cementless acetabular reconstruction and structural bone-grafting in dysplastic hips,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 387–394, 2006.
[8]
S. K. Young, L. D. Dorr, R. L. Kaufman, and T. A. W. Gruen, “Factors related to failure of structural bone grafts in acetabular reconstruction of total hip arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 6, supplement, pp. S73–S82, 1991.
[9]
S. Stevenson, S. E. Emery, and V. M. Goldberg, “Factors affecting bone graft incorporation,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 324, pp. 66–74, 1996.
[10]
J. F. Crowe, V. J. Mani, and C. S. Ranawat, “Total hip replacement in congential dislocation and dysplasia of the hip,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 1979.
[11]
I. Sharp, “Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. British Volume, vol. 43, pp. 268–272, 1961.
[12]
A. F. Brooker, J. W. Bowerman, R. A. Robinson, and L. H. Riley Jr., “Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1629–1632, 1973.
[13]
G. M. Russotti and W. H. Harris, “Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 587–592, 1991.
[14]
J. G. DeLee and J. Charnley, “Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 121, pp. 20–32, 1976.
[15]
R. D. Mulroy Jr. and W. H. Harris, “Failure of acetabular autogenous grafts in total hip arthroplasty,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 1536–1540, 1990.
[16]
M. W. Pagnano, A. D. Hanssen, D. G. Lewallen, and W. J. Shaughnessy, “The effect of superior placement of the acetabular component on the rate of loosening after total hip arthroplasty: long-term results in patients who have crowe type-II congenital dysplasia of the hip,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 1004–1014, 1996.
[17]
L. D. Dorr, S. Tawakkol, M. Moorthy, W. Long, and Z. Wan, “Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 1999.
[18]
G. Hartofilakidis, K. Stamos, T. Karachallos, T. T. Ioannidis, and N. Zacharakis, “Congenital hip disease in adults: classification of acetabular deficiencies and operative treatment with acetabuloplasty combined with total hip arthroplasty,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 683–692, 1996.
[19]
M. Ikeuchi, T. Kawakami, K. Kitaoka, Y. Okanoue, and T. Tani, “Total hip arthroplasty with a sliding iliac graft for acetabular dysplasia,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 635–639, 2005.
[20]
C. M. Farrell, D. J. Berry, and M. E. Cabanela, “Autogenous femoral head bone grafts for acetabular deficiency in total-hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip: long-term effect on pelvic bone stock,” Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 698–702, 2005.
[21]
P. Bobak, B. M. Wroblewski, P. D. Siney, P. A. Fleming, and R. Hall, “Charnley low-friction arthroplasty with an autograft of the femoral head for developmental dysplasia of the hip: the 10- to 15-year results,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 508–511, 2000.
[22]
A. A. Shetty, P. Sharma, S. Singh, A. Tindall, S. V. Kumar, and C. Rand, “Bulk femoral-head autografting in uncemented total hip arthroplasty for acetabular dysplasia: results at 8 to 11 years follow-up,” Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 706–713, 2004.