Background. Selection of entry point for nail insertion is controversial and lack firm anatomical basis. The study is done to analyze the proximal anthropometry of femur and measure the Trochanter-Shaft Angle to find its relation and significance in selection of entry point for antegrade uniplanar femoral nail. Materials and Methods. Study involves the measurement of trochanter-shaft angle and other anthropometric measurements on 50 dry femora and on digital radiogram. Results. Trochanter-Shaft angle ranges between 5–17 degrees in anthropometric study and 4–14 degrees in radiological study. Over all in 27 cases (54%), exit points of reamur fall in the middle quadrant in sagittal and coronal plane, which corresponds to the T-S angle of 6–12 degrees. Discussion and Conclusion. Proximal femoral Anthropometry and Trochanter-shaft angle is variable; hence it is difficult to fix any anatomical point as a universal entry point for antegrade femoral nail insertion. Trochanter shaft angle (TSA) can be well accessed radiologically and serve as a guide for selection of proper entry point.for safe nail insertion. Clinical Relevance. Individual variations in the proximal femur anatomy for safe nail insertion can be correlated with Trochanter shaft angle to serve safe entry site. 1. Introduction Selection of entry point for antegrade femoral interlocking nail is controversial, and there still is debate as to the most appropriate starting point [1–4]. Piriformis fossa [5–7] has been advocated as traditional entry point. However, complications [7–9] have been reported with traditional Piriformis fossa as a starting point. This has led to interest in the off-axis entry point, but to some extent, this off-axis entry used is not clear as this results in high femoral strain during insertion. Moreover proximal femoral anthropometry and anatomy of greater trochanter has different dimension [4, 10, 11]; hence it is difficult to define the universal entry point piriformis fossa, greater trochanter, or any other site for antegrade intramedullary nailing. The least starining and anatomical point for safe nail insertion should be in the line of medullary canal of femur, which can be determined proximally on trochanteric area by measuring Trochanter-shaft angle (TSA). Therefore, the present study is undertaken to measure the trochanter shaft angle and develop the anatomical and radiological basis for it. 2. Materials and Methods The Study involves the 50 dry adult cadaveric femora in anatomy museum and biomechanical laboratory. Adult femoral bones that were nonfractured having no
References
[1]
J. A. Valverde, M. G. Alonso, J. G. Porro, D. Rueda, P. M. Larrauri, and J. J. Soler, “Use of the gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 350, pp. 56–61, 1998.
[2]
S. D. Miller, B. Burkart, E. Damson, N. Shrive, and R. C. Bray, “The effect of the entry hole for an intramedullary nail on the strength of the proximal femur,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Series B, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 202–206, 1993.
[3]
W. M. Ricci, J. Schwappach, M. Tucker et al., “Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 663–667, 2006.
[4]
R. F. Ostrum, A. Marcantonio, and R. Marburger, “A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 681–686, 2005.
[5]
I. Kempf, A. Grosse, and G. Beck, “Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Series A, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 709–720, 1985.
[6]
R. A. Winquist, S. T. Hansen, and D. K. Clawson, “Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Series A, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 529–539, 1984.
[7]
D. Buford, K. Christensen, and P. Weatherall, “Intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures in adolescents,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 350, pp. 85–89, 1998.
[8]
R. A. Mileski, K. L. Garvin, and L. A. Crosby, “Avascular necrosis of the femoral head in an adolescent following intramedullary nailing of the femur. A case report,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Series A, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1706–1708, 1994.
[9]
J. H. Beaty, S. M. Austin, W. C. Warner, S. T. Canale, and L. Nichols, “Interlocking intramedullary nailing of femoral-shaft fractures in adolescents: preliminary results and complications,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 178–183, 1994.
[10]
W. Grechenig, W. Pichler, H. Clement, N. P. Tesch, and S. Grechenig, “Anatomy of the greater femoral Trochanter: clinical importance for intramedullary femoral nailing Anatomic study of 100 cadaver specimens,” Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 899–901, 2006.
[11]
T. Gausepohl, D. Pennig, J. Koebke, and S. Harnoss, “Antegrade femoral nailing: an anatomical determination of the correct entry point,” Injury, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 701–705, 2002.
[12]
K. D. Johnson, A. F. Tencer, and M. C. Sherman, “Biomechanical factors affecting fracture stability and femoral bursting in closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures, with illustrative case presentations,” Journal of orthopaedic trauma, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1987.
[13]
T. Ziylan and K. A. Murshid, “An analysis of Anatolian human femur anthropometry,” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 231–235, 2002.
[14]
E. A. Perez, A. A. Jahangir, R. P. Mashru, and T. A. Russell, “Is there a gluteus medius tendon injury during reaming through a modified medial trochanteric portal? A cadaver study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 617–620, 2007.
[15]
G. M. Georgiadis, T. A. Olexa, and N. Ebraheim, “Entry sites for antegrade femoral nailing,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 330, pp. 281–287, 1996.
[16]
C. Dora, M. Leunig, M. Beck, D. Rothenfluh, and R. Ganz, “Entry point soft tissue damage in antegrade femoral nailing: a cadaver study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 488–493, 2001.
[17]
S. Standring, GRAY’S Anatomy the Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, chapter 111, 39th edition, 2004.