全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Working Memory and the Enactment Effect in Early Alzheimer’s Disease

DOI: 10.1155/2014/694761

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study examines the enactment effect in early Alzheimer’s disease using a novel working memory task. Free recall of action-object instruction sequences was measured in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and older adult controls . Instruction sequences were read out loud by the experimenter (verbal-only task) or read by the experimenter and performed by the participants (subject-performed task). In both groups and for all sequence lengths, recall was superior in the subject-performed condition than the verbal-only condition. Individuals with Alzheimer’s disease showed a deficit in free recall of recently learned instruction sequences relative to older adult controls, yet both groups show a significant benefit from performing actions themselves at encoding. The subject-performed task shows promise as a tool to improve working memory in early Alzheimer’s disease. 1. Introduction Deficits in working memory (WM), a limited capacity system that supports the online manipulation and temporary storage of information [1], are considered to be a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), even in its earliest stages [2]. Deficits in span tasks [3, 4] and dual task procedures [5, 6] emerge in the early stages of AD, and have been attributed to central executive dysfunction [7]. Of particular interest is the finding that individuals at genetic risk of developing AD show poor WM performance relative to those not at genetic risk [8, 9], highlighting the potential of such tasks to detect early AD. This study considered the usefulness of the subject-performed task (SPT) manipulation [10] in improving WM in early AD and healthy older adult controls, in a task measuring the ability to verbally repeat short sequences of instructions. The subject-performed task [10] involves verbally presenting participants with words or instructions consisting of sets of simple actions (e.g., “open the book”), which they are required to enact during this encoding phase. Recall of the actions is then subsequently tested, typically via verbal recall or recognition. In general, research shows that enacted encoding facilitates later memory performance, relative to control conditions in which no enactment occurs during encoding [11]. Cohen [10] originally hypothesised that SPT effects are nonstrategic in nature, such that encoding during SPT does not rely on active verbal or organisational strategies that are necessary during basic verbal encoding. The enactment effect may also be attributable to the development of a richer set of representations supporting performance including visual,

References

[1]  A. Baddeley, “The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 417–423, 2000.
[2]  S. Belleville, H. Chertkow, and S. Gauthier, “Working memory and control of attention in persons with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment,” Neuropsychology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 458–469, 2007.
[3]  L. G. Gagnon and S. Belleville, “Working memory in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: contribution of forgetting and predictive value of complex span tasks,” Neuropsychology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 226–236, 2011.
[4]  H. Spinnler, S. Della Sala, R. Bandera, and A. Baddeley, “Dementia, ageing, and the structure of human memory,” Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 193–211, 1988.
[5]  R. H. Logie, G. Cocchini, S. Della Sala, and A. D. Baddeley, “Is there a specific executive capacity for dual task coordination? Evidence from Alzheimer's disease,” Neuropsychology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 504–513, 2004.
[6]  A. D. Baddeley, S. Bressi, S. D. Sala, R. Logie, and H. Spinnler, “The decline of working memory in Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study,” Brain, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 2521–2542, 1991.
[7]  J. D. Huntley and R. J. Howard, “Working memory in early Alzheimer's disease: a neuropsychological review,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 121–132, 2010.
[8]  M. A. Parra, S. Abrahams, R. H. Logie, L. G. Méndez, F. Lopera, and S. Della Sala, “Visual short-term memory binding deficits in familial Alzheimer's disease,” Brain, vol. 133, no. 9, pp. 2702–2713, 2010.
[9]  V. M. Rosen, J. L. Bergeson, K. Putnam, A. Harwell, and T. Sunderland, “Working memory and apolipoprotein E: what's the connection?” Neuropsychologia, vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 2226–2233, 2002.
[10]  R. L. Cohen, “On the generality of some memory laws,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 267–281, 1981.
[11]  J. Engelkamp, Memory for Actions, Psychology Press, Hove, UK, 1998.
[12]  L. Backman and L. G. Nilsson, “Aging effects in free recall: an exception to the rule,” Human Learning, vol. 4, pp. 79–87, 1984.
[13]  J. Engelkamp and H. D. Zimmer, “Memory for action events: a new field of research,” Psychological Research, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 153–157, 1989.
[14]  R. Kormi-Nouri, “The nature of memory for action events: an episodic integration view,” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 337–363, 1995.
[15]  M. Knopf, W. Mack, A. Lenel, and S. Ferrante, “Memory for action events: findings in neurological patients,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2005.
[16]  D. Z. Wojcik, R. J. Allen, C. Brown, and C. Souchay, “Memory for actions in autism spectrum disorder,” Memory, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 549–558, 2011.
[17]  M. B. Dick, M.-L. Kean, and D. Sands, “Memory for action events in Alzheimer-type dementia: further evidence of an encoding failure,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 71–87, 1989.
[18]  S. Hutton, L. Sheppard, J. M. Rusted, and H. H. Ratner, “Structuring the acquisition and retrieval environment to facilitate learning in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type,” Memory, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 113–130, 1996.
[19]  A. Herlitz, R. Adolfsson, L. B?ckman, and L.-G. Nilsson, “Cue utilization following different forms of encoding in mildly, moderately, and severely demented patients with Alzheimer's disease,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 119–130, 1991.
[20]  F. Lekeu, M. van der Linden, G. Moonen, and E. Salmon, “Exploring the effect of action familiarity on SPTs recall performance in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1057–1069, 2002.
[21]  T. Yang, S. E. Gathercole, and R. J. Allen, “Benefit of enactment over oral repetition of verbal instruction does not require additional working memory during encodingPsychonomic Bulletin and Review,” 2013.
[22]  D. R. Addis and L. J. Tippett, “Memory of myself: autobiographical memory and identity in Alzheimer's disease,” Memory, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–74, 2004.
[23]  J. Lalanne, P. Grolleau, and P. Pascale, “Self-reference effect and episodic memory in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease: myth or reality?” Psychologie and Neuropsychiatrie Du Vieillissement, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 277–294, 2010.
[24]  M. F. Folstein, S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh, “Mini-mental state: practical method for grading cognitive state of patients for clinician,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 12, pp. 189–198, 1975.
[25]  H. E. Nelson, National Adult Heading Test (NART): Test Manual, NFER-Nelson, Windsor, UK, 1982.
[26]  S. E. Gathercole and T. P. Alloway, Working Memory and Learning: A Practical Guide for Teachers, Sage, London, UK, 2008.
[27]  U. Olofsson, “The effect of enactment on memory for order,” Psychological Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 75–79, 1996.
[28]  C. Souchay and C. J. A. Moulin, “Memory and consciousness in Alzheimer's disease,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 186–195, 2009.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133