全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Application of a New Integrated Bipolar and Ultrasonic Energy Device in Laparoscopic Hysterectomies

DOI: 10.1155/2013/453581

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Objective. A retrospective study to evaluate the Thunderbeat, a new vessel sealing device in a small group of patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy to test the safety and effectiveness in achieving hemostasis. Method. The Thunderbeat was used in 12 cases of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Operative performance involving hemostasis, sealing/coagulation, cutting, dissection, and tissue manipulation was evaluated. Results. No complications were encountered intraoperatively and postoperatively. Intraoperative experience involving hemostasis, sealing/coagulation, and cutting was optimal. Tissue handling was acceptable except for fine dissection. Conclusion. The Thunderbeat is an efficient and safe alternative to standard bipolar in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Larger studies are required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and significant reduction in operating times as compared to conventional bipolar energy. 1. Introduction Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed gynaecological surgeries in the world [1]. Although a Cochrane review favours the transvaginal route because of earlier return to normal activities, fewer febrile episodes, and shorter hospital stay [2], about two-thirds of hysterectomies are still performed abdominally due to uterine size and the technical challenge of access. The last two decades have seen an advent in laparoscopic surgeries primarily due to improved capabilities in optics, energy technology, and increasing surgical expertise. This has allowed minimally invasive surgery to confer the same advantages of the vaginal hysterectomy even for the more challenging cases. Similar to vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy has less operative bleeding, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, and shorter convalescence time compared to abdominal hysterectomy [3, 4]. Haemostasis is fundamental in all surgical procedures, and even more so in minimally invasive surgery. Traditional methods of staples and clips have gradually been abandoned due to cost, difficulty with repeated applications, and problems of displacement [4]. Suturing is difficult to master, technically challenging, and time-consuming. Standard energy devices—monopolar and bipolar coagulation—are currently widely used due to their inexpensive nature and reusability. However, this involves high instrument traffic, thermal spread, and sticking and charring of tissues. New products in the market include advanced bipolar coagulation (LigAsure, Bicision, and EnSeal) and ultrasonic energy (Harmonic Ace). Advanced bipolar devices possess active feedback

References

[1]  R. Pokras and V. G. Hufnagel, “Hysterectomy in the United States, 1965–84,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 852–853, 1988.
[2]  T. E. Nieboer, N. Johnson, A. Lethaby et al., “Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 3, Article ID CD003677, 2009.
[3]  J. H. Olsson, M. Ellstrom, and M. Hahlin, “A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 345–350, 1996.
[4]  S. F. Meikle, E. W. Nugent, and M. Orleans, “Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 304–311, 1997.
[5]  P. A. Campbell, A. B. Cresswell, T. G. Frank, and A. Cuschieri, “Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissection,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1640–1645, 2003.
[6]  T. A. Emam and A. Cuschieri, “How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?” Annals of Surgery, vol. 237, no. 2, pp. 186–191, 2003.
[7]  J. Milsom, K. Trencheva, S. Monette et al., “Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and versatility of a new surgical energy device (THUNDERBEAT) in comparison with Harmonic ACE, LigaSure V, and EnSeal devices in a porcine model,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 378–386, 2012.
[8]  D. Seehofer, M. Mogl, S. Boas-Knoop et al., “Safety and efficacy of new integrated bipolar and ultrasonic scissors compared to conventional laparoscopic 5-mm sealing and cutting instruments,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2541–2549, 2012.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133