全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

New Subclasses of Biunivalent Functions Involving Dziok-Srivastava Operator

DOI: 10.1155/2013/387178

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We introduce two new subclasses of biunivalent functions which are defined by using the Dziok-Srivastava operator. Furthermore, we find estimates on the coefficients and for functions in these new subclasses. 1. Introduction Let denote the class of all functions of the form which are analytic in the open unit disc . Also let denote the class of all functions in which are univalent in . Some of the important and well-investigated subclasses of the univalent function class include, for example, the class of starlike functions of order in and the class of convex functions of order in . By definition, we have Ding et al. [1] introduced the following class of analytic functions defined as follows: It is easy to see that for . Thus, for , , and hence is univalent class (see [2–4]). It is well known that every function has an inverse , defined by where A function is said to be bi-univalent in if both and are univalent in . Let denote the class of bi-univalent functions in given by (1). For a brief history and interesting examples in the class see [5]. Brannan and Taha [6] (see also [7]) introduced certain subclasses of the bi-univalent function class similar to the familiar subclasses and of starlike and convex functions of order , respectively (see [8]). Thus, following Brannan and Taha [6] (see also [7]), a function is in the class of strongly bi-starlike functions of order if each of the following conditions is satisfied: where is the extension of to . The classes and of bi-starlike functions of order and biconvex functions of order , corresponding, respectively, to the function classes and , were also introduced analogously. For each of the function classes and , they found nonsharp estimates on the first two Taylor-Maclaurin coefficients and (for details, see [6, 7]). For function given by (1) and given by the Hadamard product (or convolution) of and is defined by For complex parameters and , the generalized hypergeometric function is defined by the following infinite series: where is the Pochhammer symbol (or shift factorial) defined, in terms of the Gamma function , by Correspondingly a function is defined by Dziok and Srivastava [9] (see also [10]) considered a linear operator defined by the following Hadamard product: If is given by (1), then we have where To make the notation simple, we write It easily follows from (14) that The linear operator is a generalization of many other linear operators considered earlier. The object of the present paper is to introduce two new subclasses of the bi-univalent functions which are defined by using the

References

[1]  S. S. Ding, Y. Ling, and G. J. Bao, “Some properties of a class of analytic functions,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 71–81, 1995.
[2]  M. P. Chen, “On the regular functions satisfying ,” Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics. Academia Sinica, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 1975.
[3]  P. N. Chichra, “New subclasses of the class of close-to-convex functions,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 1976.
[4]  T. H. MacGregor, “Functions whose derivative has a positive real part,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 104, pp. 532–537, 1962.
[5]  H. M. Srivastava, A. K. Mishra, and P. Gochhayat, “Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1188–1192, 2010.
[6]  D. A. Brannan and T. S. Taha, “On some classes of bi-univalent functions,” in Mathematical Analysis and Its Applications, S. M. Mazhar, A. Hamoui, and N. S. Faour, Eds., vol. 3 of KFAS Proceedings Series, pp. 53–60, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1985, see also Studia Universitatis Babe?-Bolyai. Series Mathematica, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 70–77, 1986.
[7]  T. S. Taha, Topics in univalent function theory [Ph.D. thesis], University of London, London, UK, 1981.
[8]  D. A. Brannan, J. Clunie, and W. E. Kirwan, “Coefficient estimates for a class of star-like functions,” Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 22, pp. 476–485, 1970.
[9]  J. Dziok and H. M. Srivastava, “Classes of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1999.
[10]  J. Dziok and H. M. Srivastava, “Certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function,” Integral Transforms and Special Functions, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 7–18, 2003.
[11]  B. A. Frasin and M. K. Aouf, “New subclasses of bi-univalent functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1569–1573, 2011.
[12]  C. Pommerenke, Univalent Functions, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, G?ttingen, Germany, 1975.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133