全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Methodology for User-Centered Innovation in Industrial Living Lab

DOI: 10.1155/2013/131596

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In the last years the Living Labs (LLs) approach is becoming really important to test new products/services in real-life settings. Following the perspective of user-centered innovation emerged by the critical review of the existing international LLs’ methodologies, this paper describes how, in the Living Lab related to KHIRA research project, research activities and innovation are integrated, according to a public-private-person partnership (PPPP), to develop innovation processes, participated and user-centered, in the industrial sector. The LL related to KHIRA research project involves several users categories: industrial partners, universities and research centers, SMEs belonging to Apulian manufacturing industry, public administrations, and other users. A heterogeneous users’ community can produce new ideas of products and services oriented to solve real industrial problems as those related to the product life-cycle management (PLM) in complex manufacturing environments. Purpose of this study is to present a methodology that can be used in the industrial LLs aimed at developing new products/services in complex environments, bridging the existing gap between the LLs’ activities management and those aimed to develop user-centered innovation. 1. Introduction Technological and methodological development, occurred in the last decade, has led the value chain of companies to present themselves in new networked models (value network). It follows that stakeholders have access to new methodological and technological paradigms that allow them to participate in these value networks and trigger the process of cocreation of products and services [1]. Although the benefits of working in a network are demonstrated [2], often a series of problems occurs, preventing the production of successful business cases [3]:(i)SMEs’ tendency to integrate themselves vertically, in order to share complementary expertise;(ii)lack of models and tools to identify and validate business opportunities;(iii)low management of intellectual property rights;(iv)low level of collaboration among the staffs belongs to different companies (know-how loss);(v)low level of knowledge access;(vi)low integration of users in the development process of new products/services.The possibility to overcome these limits is offered by the Living Labs approach. The LLs operate according to the development model open innovation functional region, offering the possibility of bridging the gap between industries and users, thanks to the engagement of end-users in the development process of new products/services

References

[1]  J. Peppard and A. Rylander, “From value chain to value network: insights for mobile operators,” European Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 2-3, pp. 128–141, 2006.
[2]  V. Allee, “A value network approach for Modelling and Measuring Intangibles,” 2002.
[3]  R. Santoro and M. Conte, “Living Labs in Open Innovation Functional Regions,” 2009, ESoCE-Net.
[4]  ENoLL, “European Network of Living Lab,” 2006, http://www.openlivinglabs.eu.
[5]  E. Almirall, “Living Labs and open innovation: roles and applicability,” The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, no. 10, pp. 21–26, 2008.
[6]  P. Ballon, J. Pierson, and S. Delaere, Test and Experimentation Platforms for Broadband Innovation: Examining European Practice, Freie Universitat of Berlin.
[7]  E. Von Hippe, “Users as innovators,” in The Sources of Innovation, Oxford Press, London, UK, 1988.
[8]  P. Markopoulos and G. Rauterberg, “Living Lab: a white paper,” IPO Annual Progress Report, 2000.
[9]  A. Corallo, M. E. Latino, M. Lazoi, S. Lettera, M. Marra, and S. Verardi, “Defining product lifecycle management: a journey across features, definitions, and concepts,” Industrial Engineering, vol. 2013, 10 pages, 2013.
[10]  J. C. Guzman, H. Schaffers, V. Bilicki, C. Merz, and M. Valenzuela, “Living Lab Fostering Open Innovation and Rural Development: Methodology and Results,” 2009.
[11]  K. B. Chen, H. L. Tsui, C. T. Yang, L. H. Ting, and H. Houng, A Living Lab Model for User Driven Innovation in Urban Communities, Institute for Information Industry, 2011.
[12]  H. Schaffers and S. Kulkki, “An Open Innovation concept fostering rural developmentAsia-Pacific Tech Monitor,” 2007.
[13]  Rural Inclusion Living Lab, “Rural Incusion,” 2009, http://www.rural-inclusion.eu/.
[14]  A. St?hlbr?st and M. Host, The Living Lab Methodology Handbook, 2012.
[15]  T. Keinonen and R. Takala, Product Concept Design: A Review of the Conceptual Design of Products in Industry, Springer, 2010.
[16]  INCOSE, “Systems Engineering Vision 2020 INCOSE-TP-2004-004-02,” 2007.
[17]  A. Osterwalder, “Business Model Generation. s.l.:Edizioni FAG,” 2010.
[18]  M. Eriksson, V. Niitamo, and S. Kulkki, “State-of-the-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation—a European approach,” 2005.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133