全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Prevalence of Social Engagement in the Disabled Elderly and Related Factors

DOI: 10.1155/2013/709823

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to explore the prevalence and related factors of social engagement in the disabled elderly. Participants were 86 elderly ranging from 65 to 84 years of age with disability dwelling in Fukushima City, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Among them, socially engaged elderly were 23 people (26.7% of the participants). Seventeen of the 23 socially engaged elderly were mildly disabled (32.7% of the mild disability group). Four were moderately disabled (20.0% of the moderate disability group), and 2 were severely disabled elderly (14.3% of the severe disability group). Factors related to social engagement in the disabled elderly were examined using multiple logistic regression analysis. Results showed that self-rated health and psychological independence were significantly associated with social engagement in the disabled elderly. This result did not change even after adjusting for disability status level. These findings suggest that support in psychological aspects, such as self-rated health and psychological independence, may promote social engagement in the disabled elderly. 1. Introduction As life expectancy increases, the concept of “successful aging,” which means how to live a healthy, meaningful, and satisfactory life, is attracting more attention [1, 2]. Social engagement has been considered a major component of successful aging and an active involvement in life [3, 4]. It is also thought to be an important factor for the elderly to age successfully despite changes in life, such as changes in the living environment and health conditions [5, 6]. The definition of social engagement varies among researchers; personal interaction and participation in social activities [7], the maintenance of many social connections and a high level of participation in social activities [8], and making social and emotional connections with people and the community [5]. In this paper, we defined social engagement as “activities which require contact with society and interpersonal activity outside home,” based on Hashimoto et al.’s definition [9]. Recent studies suggest that active social engagement in the community-dwelling elderly contributes to physical and mental health [4, 10, 11], life expectancy [12], subjective well-being [6], self-rated health [13, 14], and life satisfaction [15]. In Europe and the United States, previous studies have already reported that active social engagement in the disabled elderly contributes to body functional status [16], cognitive function status [8], depressive symptoms [5, 17], and subjective well-being [18]. In

References

[1]  S. J. McLaughlin, C. M. Connell, S. G. Heeringa, L. W. Li, and J. S. Roberts, “Successful aging in the United States: prevalence estimates from a national sample of older adults,” Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 216–226, 2010.
[2]  W. J. Strawbridge, M. I. Wallhagen, and R. D. Cohen, “Successful aging and well-being: self-rated compared with Rowe and Kahn,” Gerontologist, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 727–733, 2002.
[3]  J. W. Rowe and R. L. Kahn, “Successful aging,” Gerontologist, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 433–440, 1997.
[4]  V. H. Menec, “The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: a 6-year longitudinal study,” Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. S74–S82, 2003.
[5]  N. S. Park, “The relationship of social engagement to psychological well-being of older adults in assisted living facilities,” Journal of Applied Gerontology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 461–481, 2009.
[6]  E. A. Greenfield and N. F. Marks, “Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adults' psychological well-being,” Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. S258–S264, 2004.
[7]  Y. Jang, J. A. Mortimer, W. E. Haley, and A. R. B. Graves, “The role of social engagement in life satisfaction: its significance among older individuals with disease and disability,” Journal of Applied Gerontology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 266–278, 2004.
[8]  S. S. Bassuk, T. A. Glass, and L. F. Berkman, “Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 165–173, 1999.
[9]  S. Hashimoto, R. Aoki, A. Tamakoshi et al., “Development of index of social activities for the elderly,” Japanese Journal of Public Health, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 760–768, 1997 (Japanese).
[10]  K. Mitoku, T. Takahashi, and T. Hoshi, “Health relation factors of elderly people and subjective feelings of health,” Kawasaki Journal of Medical Welfare, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 411–421, 2006 (Japanese).
[11]  Y. Jung, T. L. Gruenewald, T. E. Seeman, and C. A. Sarkisian, “Productive activities and development of frailty in older adults,” Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 256–261, 2010.
[12]  T. A. Glass, C. Mendes de Leon, R. A. Marottoli, and L. F. Berkman, “Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans,” British Medical Journal, vol. 319, no. 7208, pp. 478–483, 1999.
[13]  J. E. Kincade, D. J. Rabiner, S. L. Bernard et al., “Older adults as a community resource: results from the national survey of self-care and aging,” Gerontologist, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 474–482, 1996.
[14]  L. A. Strain, C. C. Grabusic, M. S. Searle, and N. J. Dunn, “Continuing and ceasing leisure activities in later life: a longitudinal study,” Gerontologist, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 217–223, 2002.
[15]  H. Okamoto, “Productive activities and well-being among community-dwelling elderly,” Japanese Journal of Public Health, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 713–723, 2009 (Japanese).
[16]  C. F. Mendes de Leon, T. A. Glass, and L. F. Berkman, “Social engagement and disability in a community population of older adults: the New Haven EPESE,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 157, no. 7, pp. 633–642, 2003.
[17]  M. C. McDonnall, “The effect of productive activities on depressive symptoms among older adults with dual sensory loss,” Research on Aging, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 234–255, 2011.
[18]  Z. Zimmer, T. Hickey, and M. S. Searle, “Activity participation and well-being among older people with arthritis,” Gerontologist, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 463–471, 1995.
[19]  M. Mano, “The significance and promotion of seniors’ participation in society in the U.S.: examination through AARP’s community activities,” Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education the University of Tokyo, vol. 42, pp. 429–437, 2002 (Japanese).
[20]  Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan, “The revision manual of long-term care,” 2012, http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/2009/05/tp0501-1.html.
[21]  W. Koyano, H. Shibata, K. Nakazato, H. Haga, and Y. Suyama, “Measurement of competence in the elderly living at home: development of an index of competence,” Japanese Journal of Public Health, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 109–114, 1987 (Japanese).
[22]  Y. Suzuki and S. Sakihara, “Measurement of psychological independence: scale validity and reliability,” Journal of Health and Human Ecology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 47–56, 2003 (Japanese).
[23]  J. Lubben, E. Blozik, G. Gillmann et al., “Performance of an abbreviated version of the lubben social network scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations,” Gerontologist, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 503–513, 2006.
[24]  Y. Muraoka, A. Oiji, and K. Ihara, “The physical and psychological and social background factor of elderly depression in the community,” Japanese Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 397–407, 1996 (Japanese).
[25]  A. Kurimoto, S. Awata, T. Ohkubo et al., “Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale,” Japanese Journal of Geriatrics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 149–157, 2011 (Japanese).
[26]  H. Sato, K. Nakajima, and H. Haga, “Factors rerated to the social activities in elderly people,” The Hokkaido Journal of Physical Therapy, vol. 14, pp. 54–59, 1997 (Japanese).
[27]  A. Bukov, I. Maas, and T. Lampert, “Social participation in very old age: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings from BASE,” Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. P510–P517, 2002.
[28]  S. Yamazaki, S. Yasumura, A. Goto, et al., “Factors associated with reducing the Tojikomori for potentially dependent elderly,” Japanese Journal of Gerontology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2010 (Japanese).
[29]  P. Katz, A. Morris, S. Gregorich et al., “Valued life activity disability played a significant role in self-rated health among adults with chronic health conditions,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 158–166, 2009.
[30]  T. Yasuda, “Human relations and community participation among the elderly population living in suburban housing complexes,” Japanese Journal of Gerontology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 450–463, 2007 (Japanese).
[31]  S. Croezen, A. Haveman-Nies, V. J. Alvarado, P. van't Veer, and C. P. G. M. de Groot, “Characterization of different groups of elderly according to social engagement activity patterns,” Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 776–781, 2009.
[32]  V. H. Menec and J. G. Chipperfield, “The interactive effect of perceived control and functional status on health and mortality among young-old and old-old adults,” Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. P118–P126, 1997.
[33]  M. von Faber, A. Bootsma-van der Wiel, E. van Exel et al., “Successful aging in the oldest old: who can be characterized as successfully aged?” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 161, no. 22, pp. 2694–2700, 2001.
[34]  M. van Willigen, “Differential benefits of volunteering across the life course,” Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. S308–S318, 2000.
[35]  K. Nakamura and K. Yamada, “Factors determining frequency of social interaction in frail elderly individuals. A study of the elderly in urban environments,” Japanese Journal of Public Health, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 282–291, 2011 (Japanese).
[36]  T. Suzuki, H. Iwasa, H. Yoshida et al., “Comprehensive health examination (“Otasha-Kenshin”) for the prevention of geriatric syndromes and a bed-ridden state in the community elderly. 1. Differences in characteristics between participants and non-participants,” Japanese Journal of Public Health, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2003 (Japanese).

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133