全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Effect of Propofol on Acid Reflux Measured with the Bravo pH Monitoring System

DOI: 10.1155/2013/605931

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background/Aim. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of propofol on acid reflux as measured with the Bravo pH monitoring system. Methods. 48-hour pH tracings of 88 children were retrospectively evaluated after placement of the Bravo capsule under propofol. Comparisons between day 1 and day 2, as well as 6-hour corresponding segments from day 1 and day 2, were made. Results. The number of reflux episodes was significantly increased during the first six-hour period on day one as compared to day 2 . The fraction of time the pH was <4 was also increased during this period, though it did not reach statistical significance. When comparing full 24-hour periods, there was no difference noted in either the number of reflux episodes or the fraction of time pH < 4 between day one and day two. Conclusion. Our data suggest an increase in gastroesophageal reflux during the postanesthesia period. This could be a direct effect of propofol, or related to other factors. Regardless of the cause, monitoring of pH for the first 6 hours following propofol administration may not be reliable when assessing these patients. Monitoring pH over a prolonged 48-hour time period can overcome this obstacle. 1. Introduction Gastroesophageal reflux is characterized by the retrograde transit of stomach contents, including gastric acid into the esophagus. Clinical symptoms associated with it range from simple heartburn to aspiration pneumonia to ALTES (acute life-threatening events) in infants. The primary method for documenting and characterizing gastroesophageal reflux is a 24–48-hour pH monitor, either wired (simple pH probe) or wireless (Bravo system; Medtronic, Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA). Ambulatory extended esophageal pH monitoring is regarded as the standard test for establishing the presence of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux in children. Standard pH probe monitoring is performed by placing an esophageal catheter through the nose and advancing it to a precalculated distance above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Due to the morbidity and intolerability associated with the nasally placed pH catheter, the Bravo pH system has become a more commonly used procedure with comparable results and better tolerance among children. The Bravo pH system consists of a small capsule which contains an antimony pH electrode, a radiotransmitter, and an internal battery. The capsule is attached to the mucosal wall of the distal esophagus and monitors pH, while transmitting data to a pager-sized device that may be easily attached to the patient’s clothes. The disposable capsule

References

[1]  T. A. Weinstein and J. Levine, “Evaluation of a catheter-free pH monitoring system in symptomatic children undergoing upper endoscopy,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 332–338, 2003.
[2]  A. D. Galatos, I. Savas, N. N. Prassinos, and D. Raptopoulos, “Gastro-oesophageal reflux during thiopentone or propofol anaesthesia in the cat,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 287–294, 2001.
[3]  K. Thorn, S. E. Thorn, and M. Wattwil, “The effects of cricoid pressure, remifentanil, and propofol on esophageal motilily and the lower esophageal sphincter,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 1200–1203, 2005.
[4]  J. K. Marsh, S. M. J. Hoffman, and C. F. Dmuchowski, “Effect of intravenous midazolam on esophageal motility testing in normal human volunteers,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 860–863, 1993.
[5]  R. M. Reveille, J. S. Goff, and K. Hollstrom-Tarwater, “The effect of intravenous diazepam on esophageal motility in normal subjects,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1046–1049, 1991.
[6]  J. M. Croffie, M. L. Ellett, Q. Lou, and J. F. Fitzgerald, “A comparison of the effect of three sedatives on esophageal sphincters in cats,” Digestive Diseases, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 1999.
[7]  K. Dowlatshahi, A. Evander, B. Walther, and D. B. Skinner, “Influence of morphine on the distal oesophagus and the lower oesophageal sphincter—a manometric study,” Gut, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 802–806, 1985.
[8]  K. P. Fung, M. V. Math, C. O. Ho, and K. M. Yap, “Midazolam as a sedative in esophageal manometry: a study of the effect on esophageal motility,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 85–88, 1992.
[9]  A. Turan, J. Wo, Y. Kasuya et al., “Effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on lower esophageal sphincter and gastroesophageal pressure gradient in healthy volunteers,” Anesthesiology, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2010.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133