全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Price Regulation in Oligopolistic Markets

DOI: 10.5402/2012/509165

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We consider price regulation in oligopolistic markets when firms are quantity setters. We consider a market for a homogeneous good with a demand function of special form ( -linearity), constant returns to scale, and identical firms. Marginal costs can take two values only: low or high. Values of all parameters except the marginal costs are known to the regulator. Assuming that the regulator is risk-neutral and maximizes expected social welfare (defined as the sum of consumer surplus and profits), we characterize the optimal policy and show how this policy depends on the basic parameters of demand and costs. 1. Introduction One of the main causes of market failure is lack of competition. Thus, a completely informed and benevolent regulator should be able to find an allocation in which all agents are better off than under oligopolistic competition. A great deal of attention has been devoted to the case in which the regulator lacks sufficient information to implement efficient allocations and a single firm supplies the whole market (see the survey by [1] and the references therein). In contrast, the case of regulation under an oligopoly has been relatively neglected. All the papers we are aware of are generalizations of optimal regulatory schemes that were proposed for the case of a monopoly: Shaffer [2] and Kim and Chang [3] generalized the work of Loeb and Magat [4], Schwermer [5] and Lee [6] generalized the work of Sappington and Sibley [7], and López-Cu?at [8] generalized the work of Baron and Myerson [9]. In this paper, we investigate the performance of a particular mechanism, price regulation, under conditions of oligopolistic competition and compare the welfare properties under its implementation with those of oligopolistic competition, also referred to as the free market (Our model does not answer the question of the optimal mechanism. In fact, Bertrand competition among firms will attain first best results. So in our model, Bertrand competition cannot be enforced by the regulator. For instance, the regulator might enforce price competition among firms but if firms condition prices on outputs, the Cournot competition will result [10]. Another interpretation of our work is that we study the properties of a particular mechanism that has been used in reality). The motivation for our study is that price regulation is (or has been) used to regulate oligopolistic markets such as gasoline, natural gas, electric power generation, telecommunications, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and so forth. Again, the initial work was done for the case of a regulated

References

[1]  M. Armstrong and D. Sappington, “Recent developments in the theory of regulation,” in Handbook of Industrial Organization, M. Armstrong and R. Porter, Eds., vol. 3, Elsevier, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2005.
[2]  S. Shaffer, “A first-best regulatory tax for oligopoly,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 373–389, 1989.
[3]  J. C. Kim and K. B. Chang, “An optimal tax/subsidy for output and pollution control under asymmetric information in oligopoly markets,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 183–197, 1993.
[4]  M. Loeb and W. Magat, “A decentralized method for utility regulation,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 399–404, 1979.
[5]  S. Schwermer, “Regulating oligopolistic industries: a generalized incentive scheme,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 97–108, 1994.
[6]  S. H. O. Lee, “A note on regulating oligopolistic industries: a hierarchical model,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 1997.
[7]  D. Sappington and D. Sibley, “Regulating without cost information: the Incremental surplus subsidy scheme,” International Economic Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 297–306, 1988.
[8]  J. López-Cu?at, “Regulating oligopolies,” Revista Espa?ola de Economía, pp. 61–91, 1995.
[9]  D. Baron and R. Myerson, “Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs,” Econometrica, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 911–930, 1982.
[10]  D. Kreps and J. Scheinkman, “Quantity pre-commitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes,” Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 326–337, 1983.
[11]  S. Littlechild, “Economic regulation of privatized water authorities,” Report for the Department of Environment, HMSO, London, UK, 1986.
[12]  S. P. Andersen and R. Renault, “Efficiency and surplus bounds in Cournot competition,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 253–264, 2003.
[13]  J. Crémer and R. McLean, “Optimal selling strategies under uncertainty for a discriminating monopolist when demands are interdependent,” Econometrica, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 345–361, 1985.
[14]  J. Crémer and R. McLean, “Full extraction of the surplus in Bayesian and dominant strategy auctions,” Econometrica, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1247–1257, 1988.
[15]  E. Maskin and J. G. Riley, “Auction design with correlated reservation values,” Mimeo, 1980.
[16]  R. B. Myerson, “Optimal auction design,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–73, 1981.
[17]  M. Armstrong, S. Cowan, and J. Vickers, Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1994.
[18]  J. J. Laffont and J. Tirole, “Using cost observation to regulate firms,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 614–641, 1986.
[19]  I. Vogelsang, “Incentive regulation, investments and technological change,” CESifo Working Paper no. 2964, 2010.
[20]  J. J. Laffont and D. Martimort, The theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2001.
[21]  R. Earle, K. Schmedders, and T. Tatur, “On price caps under uncertainty,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 93–111, 2007.
[22]  N. Fabra, N. H. von der Fehr, and M. A. de Frutos, “Market design and investment incentives,” Working Paper, Carlos III University, 2009.
[23]  S. Buehler, A. Burger, and R. Ferstl, “The investment effects of price caps under imperfect competition: a note,” Economics Letters, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 92–94, 2010.
[24]  M. Armstrong, J. Vickers, and J. Zhou, “Consumer protection and the incentive to become informed,” Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 7, no. 2-3, pp. 399–410, 2009.
[25]  J. P. McHardy, “Miscalculations of monopoly and oligopoly welfare losses with linear demand,” Hull Economic Research Papers, 2000.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133