全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Some Studies on Prestressed Reinforced Granular Beds Overlying Weak Soil

DOI: 10.5402/2012/436327

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper mainly investigates, from a series of laboratory scale bearing capacity tests carried out on a model square footing, the improvement in bearing capacity and reduction in settlement of a geonet reinforced granular bed (RGB) overlying weak soil due to prestressing the reinforcement. The parameters are the strength of the underlying weak soil, thickness of the granular bed, and magnitude and direction of prestressing force. The settlements at the interface are also measured. The addition of prestress to geonet reinforcement results in significant improvement in the load carrying capacity and settlement response of the prestressed geonet RGB. Improvement in bearing capacity is found to be more with biaxial prestressing than with uniaxial prestressing. Experimental results are also used to validate a proposed numerical model. The BCR (bearing capacity ratio) values predicted from this model are found to be in good agreement with the experimentally obtained BCR values. Finite element analyses are also carried out using the programme PLAXIS, to study the effect of prestressing the reinforcement. Results obtained from finite element analyses are also found to be in good agreement with the experimental results. 1. Introduction Soil reinforcing technique, using geosynthetics, has become a major ground improvement technique in geotechnical practice over the last three decades [1]. Its use is growing rapidly as worldwide development of infrastructure poses an increasing demand for land reclamation and utilization of soft foundation soils. Placing a granular bed over weak soil is the simplest technique of ground improvement that reduces settlements and increases bearing capacity of weak soil. The use of geosynthetic reinforced granular bed (RGB) over weak soil further reduces settlement and increases the bearing capacity of weak soil. Many experimental and analytical studies have been performed to investigate the behaviour of reinforced granular beds for different soil types. Binquet and Lee [2] conducted tests on sand reinforced with metal strips. Shivashankar et al. [3] proposed that the improvement in bearing capacity of a reinforced granular bed is comprised of three components, namely, shear layer effect, confinement effect and surcharge effect. They proposed equations for computing the effect of each of these components. Kurian et al. [4] simulated reinforced soil systems with horizontal layers of reinforcement using a 3D nonlinear finite element programme. The results of numerical analysis were in good agreement with those obtained from model

References

[1]  G. L. Sivakumar Babu, An introduction to Soil Reinforcement and Geosynthetics, Universities Press, 2006.
[2]  J. Binquet and K. L. Lee, “Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 1241–1255, 1975.
[3]  R. Shivashankar, M. R. Madhav, and N. Miura, “Reinforced granular beds overlying soft clay,” in Proceedings of the 11th South East Asian Geotechnical Conference, pp. 409–414, Singapore, 1993.
[4]  N. P. Kurian, K. S. Beena, and R. Krishna Kumar, “Settlement of reinforced sand in foundations,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 818–827, 1997.
[5]  K. Deb, S. Chandra, and P. K. Basudhar, “Nonlinear analysis of multilayer extensible geosynthetic-reinforced granular bed on soft soil,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 11–23, 2007.
[6]  K. Deb, N. Sivakugan, S. Chandra, and P. K. Basudhar, “Numerical analysis of multi layer geosynthetic-reinforced granular bed over soft fill,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 639–646, 2007.
[7]  S. Alamshahi and N. Hataf, “Bearing capacity of strip footings on sand slopes reinforced with geogrid and grid-anchor,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 217–226, 2009.
[8]  G. Madhavilatha and A. Somwanshi, “Bearing capacity of square footings on geosynthetic reinforced sand,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 281–294, 2009.
[9]  G. Madhavilatha and A. Somwanshi, “Effect of reinforcement form on the bearing capacity of square footings on sand,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 409–422, 2009.
[10]  R. Sharma, Q. Chen, M. A. Farsakh, and S. Yoon, “Analytical modeling of geogrid reinforced soil foundation,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2009.
[11]  P. Vinod, A. B. Bhaskar, and S. Sreehari, “Behaviour of a square model footing on loose sand reinforced with braided coir rope,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 464–474, 2009.
[12]  J. Lovisa, S. K. Shukla, and N. Sivakugan, “Behaviour of prestressed geotextile-reinforced sand bed supporting a loaded circular footing,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2010.
[13]  A. P. S. Selvadurai, Elastic Analysis of Soil-Foundation Interaction, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA, 1979.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133