全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Endovascular Treatment of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Short and Angulated Neck in High-Risk Patient

DOI: 10.1155/2013/898024

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is an established alternative to open repair. However lifelong surveillance is still required to monitor endograft function and signal the need for secondary interventions (Hobo and Buth 2006). Aortic morphology, especially related to the proximal neck, often complicates the procedure or increases the risk for late device-related complications (Hobo et al. 2007 and Chisci et al. 2009). The definition of a short and angulated neck is based on length (<15?mm), and angulation (>60°) (Hobo et al. 2007 and Chisci et al. 2009). A challenging neck also offers difficulties during open repairs (OR), necessitating extensive dissection with juxta- or suprarenal aortic cross-clamping. Patients with extensive aneurysmal disease typically have more comorbidities and may not tolerate extensive surgical trauma (Sarac et al. 2002). It is, therefore, unclear whether aneurysms with a challenging proximal neck should be offered EVAR or OR (Cox et al. 2006, Choke et al. 2006, Robbins et al. 2005, Sternbergh III et al. 2002, Dillavou et al. 2003, and Greenberg et al. 2003). In our case the insertion of a thoracic endograft followed by the placement of a bifurcated aortic endograft for the treatment of a very short and severely angulated neck proved to be feasible offering acceptable duration of aneurysm exclusion. This adds up to our armamentarium in the treatment of high-risk patients, and it should be considered in emergency cases when the fenestrated and branched endografts are not available. 1. Introduction Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is an established alternative to open repair. However lifelong surveillance is still required to monitor endograft function and signal the need for secondary interventions [1]. Endovascular repair (EVAR) may not always be the best treatment option, as not all patients are eligible for EVAR owing to aortoiliac anatomy. Severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation is clearly associated with proximal type I endoleak, while its relationship with stent-graft migration is not clear [2]. Excluder, Zenith, and Talent stent grafts perform well in patients with severe neck angulation, with only a few differences among devices [2]. Aortic morphology, especially related to the proximal neck, often complicates the procedure or increases the risk for late device-related complications [2, 3]. The definition of a short and angulated neck is based on length (<15?mm) and angulation (>60°) [2, 3]. Fenestrated stent grafts crossing the orifices of the renal arteries have been

References

[1]  R. Hobo and J. Buth, “Secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using current endografts. A EUROSTAR report,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 896–e1, 2006.
[2]  R. Hobo, J. Kievit, L. J. Leurs, and J. Buth, “Influence of severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation on complications at the proximal neck following endovascular AAA repair: a EUROSTAR study,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2007.
[3]  E. Chisci, T. Kristmundsson, G. de Donato et al., “The AAA with a challenging neck: outcome of open versus endovascular repair with standard and fenestrated stent-grafts,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 137–145, 2009.
[4]  R. K. Greenberg, S. Haulon, S. O'Neill, S. Lyden, and K. Ouriel, “Primary endovascular repair of juxtarenal aneurysms with fenestrated endovascular grafting,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 484–491, 2004.
[5]  L. J. Leurs, G. Stulti?ns, J. Kievit, and J. Buth, “Adverse events at the aneurysmal neck identified at follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneursym repair: how do they correlate?” Vascular, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 261–267, 2005.
[6]  T. P. Sarac, D. G. Clair, N. R. Hertzer et al., “Contemporary results of juxtarenal aneurysm repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1104–1111, 2002.
[7]  D. E. Cox, D. L. Jacobs, R. L. Motaganahalli, C. M. Wittgen, and G. J. Peterson, “Outcomes of endovascular AAA repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy using adjunctive balloon-expandable stents,” Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 2006.
[8]  E. Choke, G. Munneke, R. Morgan et al., “Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy,” CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 975–980, 2006.
[9]  M. Robbins, B. Kritpracha, H. G. Beebe, F. J. Criado, Y. Daoud, and A. J. Comerota, “Suprarenal endograft fixation avoids adverse outcomes associated with aortic neck angulation,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 172–177, 2005.
[10]  W. C. Sternbergh III, G. Carter, J. W. York, M. Yoselevitz, and S. R. Money, “Aortic neck angulation predicts adverse outcome with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 482–486, 2002.
[11]  E. D. Dillavou, S. C. Muluk, R. Y. Rhee et al., “Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 657–663, 2003.
[12]  R. K. Greenberg, D. Clair, S. Srivastava et al., “Should patients with challenging anatomy be offered endovascular aneurysm repair?” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 990–996, 2003.
[13]  K. P. Conway, J. Byrne, M. Townsend, and I. F. Lane, “Prognosis of patients turned down for conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the endovascular and sonographic era: Szilagyi revisited?” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 752–757, 2001.
[14]  R. M. Greenhalgh, “Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9478, pp. 2187–2192, 2005.
[15]  M. Zanchetta, F. Faresin, L. Pedon et al., “Funnel technique for first-line endovascular treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm with an ectatic proximal neck,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 775–778, 2006.
[16]  B. M. Stanley, J. B. Semmens, M. M. Lawrence-Brown, M. A. Goodman, and D. E. Hartley, “Fenestration in endovascular grafts for aortic aneurysm repair: new horizons for preserving blood flow in branch vessels,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2001.
[17]  J. L. Anderson, M. Berce, and D. Hartley, “Endoluminal aortic grafting with renal and superior mesenteric artery incorporation by graft fenestration,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 8, pp. 3–15, 2001.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133