全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Utility of Two PANSS 5-Factor Models for Assessing Psychosocial Outcomes in Clinical Programs for Persons with Schizophrenia

DOI: 10.1155/2013/705631

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Using symptom factors derived from two models of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) as covariates, change over time in consumer psychosocial functioning, medication adherence/compliance, and treatment satisfaction outcomes are compared based on a randomized, controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of antipsychotic medications for 108 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia. Random effects regression analysis was used to determine the relative performance of these two 5-factor models as covariates in estimating change over time and the goodness of fit of the regression equations for each outcome. Self-reported psychosocial functioning was significantly associated with the relief of positive and negative syndromes, whereas patient satisfaction was more closely and significantly associated with control of excited/activation symptoms. Interviewer-rated psychosocial functioning was significantly associated with relief of positive and negative symptoms, as well as excited/activation and disoriented/autistic preoccupation symptoms. The VDG 5-factor model of the PANSS represents the best “goodness of fit” model for assessing symptom-related change associated with improved psychosocial outcomes and functional recovery. Five-factor models of the syndromes of schizophrenia, as assessed using the PANSS, are differentially valuable in determining the predictors of psychosocial and satisfaction changes over time, but not of improved medication adherence/compliance. 1. Introduction Recovery from a serious mental illness is now widely endorsed as a guiding principle of mental health policy and brings new rules for services, for example, user involvement and person-centered care, as well as participatory approaches to evidence-based medicine and policy. Recovery is determined to varying degrees by the severity of psychopathology and cognitive deficits, objective social variables such as marital status and living situation, previous psychosocial functioning, course of illness variables such as age of onset or duration, and personal risk factors such as gender or race [1, 2]. Cognitive function, encompassing all aspects of perceiving, thinking, reasoning, and remembering, is a key predictor of functional recovery [3]. Whether pharmacotherapy or psychosocial interventions are being investigated, treatment studies for persons with schizophrenia typically encompass a range of outcomes, including symptoms, psychosocial functioning, quality of life, treatment adherence or compliance, or satisfaction with the treatment received [2, 4]. Previous research has

References

[1]  E. Bromley and J. S. Brekke, “Assessing function and functional outcome in schizophrenia,” Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, vol. 4, pp. 3–21, 2010.
[2]  R. Tandon, H. A. Nasrallah, and M. S. Keshavan, “Schizophrenia, “Just the Facts” 5. Treatment and prevention past, present, and future,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 122, no. 1–3, pp. 1–23, 2010.
[3]  V. Roder, D. R. Mueller, and S. J. Schmidt, “Effectiveness of Integrated Psychological Therapy (IPT) for schizophrenia patients: a research update,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. S71–S79, 2011.
[4]  L. B. Dixon, F. Dickerson, A. S. Bellack et al., “The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychosocial treatment recommendations and summary statements,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 48–70, 2010.
[5]  D. I. Velligan, P. J. Weiden, M. Sajatovic et al., “Strategies for addressing adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness: recommendations from the expert consensus guidelines,” Journal of Psychiatric Practice, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 306–324, 2010.
[6]  F. Vila-Rodriguez, S. Ochoa, J. Autonell, J. Usall, and J. M. Haro, “Complex interaction between symptoms, social factors, and gender in social functioning in a community-dwelling sample of schizophrenia,” Psychiatric Quarterly, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 261–274, 2011.
[7]  J. Lindenmayer, S. Grochowski, and R. B. Hyman, “Five factor model of schizophrenia: replication across samples,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 229–234, 1995.
[8]  M. Nakaya, H. Suwa, and K. Ohmori, “Latent structures underlying schizophrenic symptoms: a five-dimensional model,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1999.
[9]  E. J. C. G. van den Oord, D. Rujescu, J. R. Robles et al., “Factor structure and external validity of the PANSS revisited,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 82, no. 2-3, pp. 213–223, 2006.
[10]  S. R. Kay, A. Fiszbein, and L. A. Opler, “The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 261–276, 1987.
[11]  P. G. Janicak, I. D. Glick, S. R. Marder et al., “The acute efficacy of aripiprazole across the symptom spectrum of schizophrenia: a pooled post hoc analysis from 5 short-term studies,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2009.
[12]  S. Dollfus, B. Everitt, J. M. Ribeyre, F. Assouly-Besse, C. Sharp, and M. Petit, “Identifying subtypes of schizophrenia by cluster analyses,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 545–555, 1996.
[13]  M. van der Gaag, A. Cuijpers, T. Hoffman et al., “The five-factor model of the positive and negative syndrome scale I: confirmatory factor analysis fails to confirm 25 published five-factor solutions,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 85, no. 1–3, pp. 273–279, 2006.
[14]  H. Liu-Seifert, O. O. Osuntokun, and P. D. Feldman, “Factors associated with adherence to treatment with olanzapine and other atypical antipsychotic medications in patients with schizophrenia,” Comprehensive Psychiatry, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 107–115, 2012.
[15]  G. M. Gharabawi, A. Greenspan, M. F. T. Rupnow et al., “Reduction in psychotic symptoms as a predictor of patient satisfaction with antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: data from a randomized double-blind trial,” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 6, article 45, 2006.
[16]  M. van der Gaag, T. Hoffman, M. Remijsen et al., “The five-factor model of the positive and negative syndrome scale II: a ten-fold cross-validation of a revised model,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 85, no. 1–3, pp. 280–287, 2006.
[17]  J. M. Jerrell, “Cost-effectiveness of risperidone, olanzapine, and conventional antipsychotic medications,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 589–605, 2002.
[18]  K. M. Wieduwilt and J. M. Jerrell, “Measuring the sensitivity to change of the role functioning scale through the utilization of the RCID Index,” International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 163–170, 1998.
[19]  K. M. Wieduwilt and J. M. Jerrell, “The reliability and validity of the SAS-SMI,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 1999.
[20]  C. C. Attkisson and T. K. Greenfield, “The client satisfaction questionnaire scales,” in Outcome Assessment in Clinical Practice, L. L. Sederer and B. Dickey, Eds., Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1995.
[21]  L. White, P. D. Harvey, L. Opler, and J. P. Lindenmayer, “Empirical assessment of the factorial structure of clinical symptoms in schizophrenia,” Psychopathology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 263–274, 1997.
[22]  H. Akaike, “Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle,” in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory, B. Petrov and F. Csaki, Eds., pp. 267–281, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, 1973.
[23]  H. Akaike, “Factor analysis and AIC,” Psychometrika, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 317–332, 1987.
[24]  L. Ngo and R. Brand, Model Selection in Linear Mixed Effects Models Using SAS PROC MIXED, SAS Users Group International, 2002.
[25]  J. E. D. Wolthaus, P. M. A. J. Dingemans, A. H. Schene et al., “Component structure of the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia and spectrum disorders,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 399–403, 2000.
[26]  M. El Yazaji, O. Battas, M. Agoub et al., “Validity of the depressive dimension extracted from principal component analysis of the PANSS in drug-free patients with schizophrenia,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 121–127, 2002.
[27]  J. M. Jerrell and S. Hrisko, “A comparison of the PANSS Pentagonal and Van der Gaag 5-factor models for assessing change over time,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 207, no. 1-2, pp. 134–139, 2013.
[28]  D. I. Velligan, P. J. Weiden, M. Sajatovic et al., “The expert consensus guideline series: adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness,” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 70, supplement 4, pp. 1–48, 2009.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133