全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Second Generation Self-Inflating Tissue Expanders: A Two-Year Experience

DOI: 10.1155/2014/457205

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background. Tissue expansion is a well-established surgical technique that produces an additional amount of normal skin to cover a defect. This technique is appealing because the skin quality and color are from the patient’s own. The widely used injectable expanders are of great reliability but carry the disadvantage of being painful during injection and most of the time require multiple clinic visits. So the idea of self-inflation became attractive and hydrogel expanders were developed and became widely known for being painless during clinic visit and decrease number of visits. The first generation expanders were modified by adding an enclosing plastic shell to decrease the unopposed expansion that occurred in the first generation expanders, which lead to pressure necrosis of the skin flaps. This made it an attractive option for tissue expansion in children and some adult patients. Patients, Materials, and Methods. Charts of 17 patients were retrospectively reviewed, all of them had second generation self-inflating expanders implanted over a 2-year period for one of two purposes, the treatment of giant nevi or burn scars. Results. Fifteen patients were females and 2 were males. The indication was large burn scar in 14 cases (14/17), in which 47/55 expanders were implanted, and giant nevus in 3/17 cases in which 8/55 expanders were implanted. Extrusion of the expander occurred in 8/55 expanders (14.5%), which occurred in 6/14 patients. The highest percentage of extrusion occurred in the neck in which two out of three expanders extruded; otherwise this complication does not seem to be related to the indication, gender, nor age of the patients. It seems to be that it is technical in nature. The patients did not have to get any injections to fill the tissue expanders, which made the expansion process less painful and more convenient. Conclusion. This seems to be currently the largest published review in which second generation expanders were used. Those expanders seem to offer a desirable advantage of being painless for children, also they do not require repeated visits to the surgeon’s clinic, which is of great value for patients living in the periphery. 1. Introduction Tissue expansion is an important tool in the plastic surgeon’s toolbox. First report of this method was in 1957, when Neumann used a rubber balloon to expand skin in the temporooccipital area to reconstruct a traumatized ear [1]. At that time it seemed like a sporadic idea it did not get a lot of publicity. Twenty years later, the idea resurfaced by Radovan and Argenta who used a silicon

References

[1]  C. G. Neumann, “The expansion of an area of skin by progressive distension of a subcutaneous balloon,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 124–130, 1957.
[2]  C. Radovan, “Development of adjacent flaps using a temporary expander,” Plastic Surgery Forum, vol. 2, article 62, 1979.
[3]  L. C. Argenta, “Reconstruction of the breast by tissue-expansion,” Clinics in Plastic Surgery, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 257–264, 1984.
[4]  E. D. Austad and G. L. Rose, “A self-inflating tissue expander,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 588–594.
[5]  K. G. Wiese, “Osmotically induced tissue expansion with hydrogels: a new dimension in tissue expansion? A preliminary report,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 309–313, 1993.
[6]  M. C. Obdeijn, J. P. A. Nicolai, and P. M. N. Werker, “The osmotic tissue expander: a three-year clinical experience,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1219–1222, 2009.
[7]  M. A. Ronert, H. Hofheinz, E. Manassa, H. Asgarouladi, and R. R. Olbrisch, “The beginning of a new era in tissue expansion: self-filling osmotic tissue expander—four-year clinical experience,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 1024–1031, 2004.
[8]  S. Chummun, P. Addison, and K. J. Stewart, “The osmotic tissue expander: a 5-year experience,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2128–2132, 2010.
[9]  M. C. Obdeijn, J. P. A. Nicolai, and P. M. N. Werker, “The osmotic tissue expander: a three-year clinical experience,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1219–1222, 2009.
[10]  S. B?ttcher-Haberzeth, S. Kapoor, M. Meuli et al., “Osmotic expanders in children: no filling—no control—no problem?” European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 163–167, 2011.
[11]  P. Lohana, N. S. Moiemen, and Y. T. Wilson, “The use of Osmed (TM) tissue expanders in paediatric burns reconstruction,” Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 38–42, 2012.
[12]  K. G. Weise, D. E. Heinemann, D. Ostermeier, and J. H. Peters, “Biomaterial properties and biocompatibility in cell culture of a novel self-inflating hydrogel tissue expander,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 179–188, 2001.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133