全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

An EPQ Model with Unit Production Cost and Set-Up Cost as Functions of Production Rate

DOI: 10.1155/2013/727685

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Extensive research has been devoted to economic production quantity (EPQ) problem. However, no attention has been paid to problems where unit production and set-up costs must be considered as functions of production rate. In this paper, we address the problem of determining the optimal production quantity and rate of production in which unit production and set-up costs are assumed to be continuous functions of production rate. Based on the traditional economic production quantity (EPQ) formula, the cost function associated with this model is proved to be nonconvex and a procedure is proposed to solve this problem. Finally, utility of the model is presented using some numerical examples and the results are analyzed. 1. Introduction The economic production quantity (EPQ) model has been widely used in practice because of its simplicity. However, there are some drawbacks in the assumption of the original EPQ model and many researchers have tried to improve it with different viewpoints. Recently, the classical EPQ model has been generalized in many directions. Some authors extended the EPQ model by incorporating the effect of learning in setups and process quality. Also, set-up time reduction on production run length and varying parameters have received significant attention. The relationship between set-up cost and production run length is also influenced by the learning and forgetting effects. The effect of learning and forgetting in setups and in product quality is investigated by Jaber and Bonney [1]. Porteus studied the effect of process deterioration on the optimal production cycle time [2]. Darwish generalized the EPQ model by considering a relationship between the set-up cost and the production run length [3]. Jaber investigated the lot sizing problem for reduction in setups with reworks and interruptions to restore the process to an “in-control’’ state [4]. Unlike the model presented by Khouja [5], he considered that the set-up cost and defect rate decrease as the number of restoration activities increases. Afshar-Nadjafi and Abbasi considered an EPQ model with depreciation cost and process quality cost as continuous functions of time [6]. Freimer et al. studied the effect of imperfect yield on EPQ decisions. They considered set-up cost reductions and process quality improvements as types of investments in the production processes [7]. Furthermore, the classical EPQ model has been investigated in many other ways; for example, the effect of varying production rate on the EPQ model was investigated by Khouja [8]. Huang introduced the EPQ model under

References

[1]  M. Y. Jaber and M. Bonney, “Lot sizing with learning and forgetting in set-ups and in product quality,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 95–111, 2003.
[2]  E. L. Porteus, “Optimal lot sizing process quality improvement and setup cost reduction,” Operations Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 137–144, 1986.
[3]  M. A. Darwish, “EPQ models with varying setup cost,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 297–306, 2008.
[4]  M. Y. Jaber, “Lot sizing for an imperfect production process with quality corrective interruptions and improvements, and reduction in setups,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 781–790, 2006.
[5]  M. Khouja, “The use of minor setups within production cycles to improve product quality and yield,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 403–416, 2005.
[6]  B. Afshar-Nadjafi and B. Abbasi, “EPQ model with depreciation cost and process quality cost as continuous functions of time,” Journal of Industrial Engineering International, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 77–89, 2009.
[7]  M. Freimer, D. Thomas, and J. Tyworth, “The value of setup cost reduction and process improvement for the economic production quantity model with defects,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 241–251, 2006.
[8]  M. Khouja, “The economic production lot size model under volume flexibility,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 515–523, 1995.
[9]  Y.-F. Huang, “Optimal retailer's replenishment policy for the EPQ model under the supplier's trade credit policy,” Production Planning and Control, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2004.
[10]  M. K. Salameh and M. Y. Jaber, “Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2000.
[11]  M. Y. Jaber, R. Y. Nuwayhid, and M. A. Rosen, “Price-driven economic order systems from a thermodynamic point of view,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 42, no. 24, pp. 5167–5184, 2004.
[12]  K.-L. Hou, “An EPQ model with setup cost and process quality as functions of capital expenditure,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2007.
[13]  J.-C. Tsou, “Economic order quantity model and Taguchi's cost of poor quality,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 283–291, 2007.
[14]  J. R. Tersine, Principles of Inventory and Materials Management, North-Holland, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1988.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133