Adnexal Masses Treated Using a Combination of the SILS Port and Noncurved Straight Laparoscopic Instruments: Turkish Experience and Review of the Literature
Objective. To report our experience treating adnexal masses using a combination of the SILS port and straight nonroticulating laparoscopic instruments. Study Design. This prospective feasibility study included 14 women with symptomatic and persistent adnexal masses. Removal of adnexal masses via single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a combination of the SILS port and straight nonroticulating laparoscopic instruments was performed. Results. All of the patients had symptomatic complex adnexal masses. Mean age of the patients was 38.4 years (range: 21–61 years) and mean duration of surgery was 71?min (range: 45–130?min). All surgeries were performed using nonroticulating straight laparoscopic instruments. Mean tumor diameter was 6?cm (range: 5–12?cm). All patient pathology reports were benign. None of the patients converted to laparotomy. All the patients were discharged on postoperative d1. Postoperatively, all the patients were satisfied with their incision and cosmetic results. Conclusion. All 14 patients were successfully treated using standard, straight nonroticulating laparoscopic instruments via the SILS port. This procedure can reduce the cost of treatment, which may eventually lead to more widespread use of the SILS port approach. Furthermore, concomitant surgical procedures are possible using this approach. However, properly designed comparative studies with single port and classic laparoscopic surgery are urgently needed. 1. Introduction Adnexal masses are one of the most common indications for surgery in gynecology clinics, and laparoscopy is generally accepted as the gold standard treatment. Classical laparoscopic surgery for adnexal masses is generally performed using ≥3 trocars. On the other hand, single-port access surgery (SPAS), also known as laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), is an evolving endoscopic approach for minimal access surgery. Various surgical procedures, including appendectomy, cholecystectomy, nephrectomy, oophorectomy, hysterectomy, adrenalectomy, gastric bypass, Nissen fundoplication, hernia repair, splenectomy, and colon resection, have been performed via SILS. SILS can result in better cosmesis, shorter recovery time, and less pain than conventional laparoscopy, which requires use of multiple trocar incisions [1, 2]. It was recently reported that adnexal masses could also be treated via SILS [3, 4]. Endoscopic surgery conducted via 3 special luminal ports, including the SILS port (Covidien, Norwalk, CT), GelPort (Applied Medical Resources, Rancho Santa
References
[1]
A. Y. Tsai and D. J. Selzer, “Single-port laparoscopic surgery,” Advances in Surgery, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2010.
[2]
D. Canes, M. M. Desai, M. Aron et al., “Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status,” European Urology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1020–1030, 2008.
[3]
P. F. Escobar, M. A. Bedaiwy, A. N. Fader, and T. Falcone, “Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 2074-e7–2074-e10, 2010.
[4]
T. J. Kim, Y. Y. Lee, M. J. Kim et al., “Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 612–615, 2009.
[5]
Y. H. Tam, K. H. Lee, J. D. Y. Sihoe, K. W. Chan, S. T. Cheung, and K. K. Pang, “Initial experience in children using conventional laparoscopic instruments in single-incision laparoscopic surgery,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 2381–2385, 2010.
[6]
F. M. Akgür, M. Olguner, G. Hakgüder, and O. Ate?, “Appendectomy conducted with single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1061–1063, 2010.
[7]
M. J. Colon, D. Telem, C. M. Divino, and E. H. Chin, “Laparoendoscopic single site surgery can be performed completely with standard equipment,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 292–294, 2011.
[8]
Y. Y. Lee, T. J. Kim, C. J. Kim et al., “Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 181–184, 2010.
[9]
Y. W. Jung, Y. M. Choi, C. K. Chung et al., “Single port transumbilical laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions: a single center experience in Korea,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 221–224, 2011.
[10]
W. C. Kim, J. E. Lee, Y. S. Kwon, Y. J. Koo, I. H. Lee, and K. T. Lim, “Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for adnexal tumors: one surgeon's initial experience over a one-year period,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 265–268, 2011.
[11]
G. Navarra, G. L. Malfa, L. Salvatore, U. Gabriele, and C. Giuseppe, “SILS and NOTES cholecystectomy: a tailored approach,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 511–514, 2010.
[12]
T. E. Langwieler, T. Nimmesgern, and M. Back, “Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1138–1141, 2009.
[13]
H. C. Tai, C. D. Lin, C. C. Wu, Y. C. Tsai, and S. S. Yang, “Homemade transumbilical port: an alternative access for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS),” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 705–708, 2010.
[14]
R. Sinha, “Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using only conventional instruments: an initial report,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 335–340, 2011.
[15]
J. Paek, E. J. Nam, Y. T. Kim, and S. W. Kim, “Overcoming technical difficulties with single-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: using conventional laparoscopic instruments,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 137–141, 2011.
[16]
M. Hayashi, M. Asakuma, K. Komeda, Y. Miyamoto, F. Hirokawa, and N. Tanigawa, “Effectiveness of a surgical glove port for single port surgery,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2487–2489, 2010.
[17]
N. Garcia-Henriquez, S. R. Shah, and T. D. Kane, “Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children using standard straight instruments: a surgeon's early experience,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 555–559, 2011.
[18]
K. E. Roberts, D. Solomon, A. J. Duffy, and R. L. Bell, “Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon's initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 506–510, 2010.
[19]
Y. Bayazit, I. A. Aridogan, D. Abat, N. Satar, and S. Doran, “Pediatric transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy: initial report,” Urology, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1116–1119, 2009.
[20]
E. R. Podolsky and P. G. Curcillo II, “Single port access (SPA) surgery—a 24-month experience,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 759–767, 2010.
[21]
D. Surico, S. Gentilli, A. Vigone, E. Paulli, L. Leo, and N. Surico, “Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for treatment of concomitant ovarian cystectomy and cholecystectomy,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 656–659, 2010.
[22]
S. Hart, S. Ross, and A. Rosemurgy, “Laparoendoscopic single-site combined cholecystectomy and hysterectomy,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 798–801, 2010.
[23]
C. C. Gunderson, J. Knight, J. Ybanez-Morano et al., “The risk of umbilical hernia and other complications with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 40–45, 2012.
[24]
H. S. Park, T. J. Kim, T. Song et al., “Single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: a surgeon's experience with an initial 200 cases,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 81–84, 2011.
[25]
P. F. Escobar, D. C. Starks, A. N. Fader, M. Barber, and L. Rojas-Espalliat, “Single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy: surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2010.