Bone-marrow aspirate material is commonly considered as one of the most sensitive tissues for a reliable diagnosis of leishmaniasis. The procedure herein described may permit less experienced veterinarians to be familiar with a quick and safe assessment method for leishmaniasis diagnosis in their patients. Animals are positioned in right lateral recumbency, and the area corresponding to the second, third, or fourth sternebra is identified and aseptically prepared. A 18-gauge needle connected to a 10?mL syringe is driven through the skin, up to the bone wall, and firmly pushed forward while rotating. Entry into the sternebra’s cavity is clearly perceived by the fall of resistance offered by the cortex. Some 2,500 sternal bone-marrow samplings were safely and efficiently performed on 887 dogs of different breeds and aging from 6 months to 14 years, during eight years of clinical activity for routine diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis in pets or for the efficacy evaluation of anti-Leishmania immunobiologicals in dogs naturally exposed to parasite transmission. Most of the samples (1716) were from 387 dogs enrolled for anti-Leishmania vaccine studies. The safety of the method was particularly assessed on these dogs that as per study protocol were submitted to repeated bone-marrow aspirations (2–4 per year) in follow-up examinations. 1. Introduction Canine leishmaniasis (CanL) has emerged as a major veterinary and public health problem in endemic areas but also in nonendemic ones where individual clinical cases or outbreaks of disease are reported, such as in northern Europe, the USA, and Canada [1–3]. Diagnosis of leishmaniasis in dogs should be based on an integrated approach considering signalment, history, clinical findings, and results of laboratory analyses aiming at Leishmania detection and/or at the evaluation the host’s immune responses [4]. Parasite detection can be achieved by microscopic demonstration of Leishmania amastigotes in macrophages of affected tissues. In dogs without clinical signs involving organs or tissues but yet suspected as having leishmaniasis because of exposure to infection risk or clinical recovery following drug treatment, a diagnostic sample should be obtained from tissues where parasites are more likely to be detected, such as spleen, bone marrow, lymph nodes, or buffy-coat from peripheral blood, in descending order of diagnostic sensitivity, respectively, [5, 6]. Part of the material sampled for cytology evaluation can be stored and, in case of negative microscopy, it can be sent to a reference laboratory for molecular
References
[1]
R. J. Slappendel and E. Teske, “A review of canine leishmaniasis presenting outside endemic areas,” in CAnine LeishmAniasis: An Update, R. Killick-Kendrick, Ed., pp. 54–59, Hoechst Roussel Vet, Wiesbaden, Germany, 1999.
[2]
P. M. Schantz, F. J. Steurer, Z. H. Duprey et al., “Autochthonous visceral leishmaniasis in dogs in North America,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 226, no. 8, pp. 1316–1322, 2005.
[3]
S. E. Shaw, D. A. Langton, and T. J. Hillman, “Canine leishmaniosis in the United Kingdom: a zoonotic disease waiting for a vector?” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 281–285, 2009.
[4]
S. Paltrinieri, L. Solano-Gallego, A. Fondati et al., “Guidelines for diagnosis and clinical classification of leishmaniasis in dogs,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 236, no. 11, pp. 1184–1191, 2010.
[5]
M. E. Mylonakis, N. Papaioannou, M. N. Saridomichelakis, A. F. Koutinas, C. Billinis, and V. I. Kontos, “Cytologic patterns of lymphadenopathy in dogs infected with Leishmania infantum,” Veterinary Clinical Pathology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 243–247, 2005.
[6]
M. N. Saridomichelakis, M. E. Mylonakis, L. S. Leontides, A. F. Koutinas, C. Billinis, and V. I. Kontos, “Evaluation of lymph node and bone marrow cytology in the diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis (Leishmania infantum) in symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 82–86, 2005.
[7]
M. A. B. Moreira, M. C. R. Luvizotto, J. F. Garcia, C. E. P. Corbett, and M. D. Laurenti, “Comparison of parasitological, immunological and molecular methods for the diagnosis of leishmaniasis in dogs with different clinical signs,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 145, no. 3-4, pp. 245–252, 2007.
[8]
V. Foglia Manzillo, T. Di Muccio, S. Cappiello et al., “Prospective study on the incidence and progression of clinical signs in na?ve dogs naturally infected by Leishmania infantum,” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 7, no. 5, 2013.
[9]
J. D. Chulay and A. D. M. Bryceson, “Quantitation of amastigotes of Leishmania donovani in smears of splenic aspirates from patients with visceral leishmaniasis,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 475–479, 1983.
[10]
L. Gradoni, V. Foglia Manzillo, A. Pagano et al., “Failure of a multi-subunit recombinant leishmanial vaccine (MML) to protect dogs from Leishmania infantum infection and to prevent disease progression in infected animals,” Vaccine, vol. 23, no. 45, pp. 5245–5251, 2005.
[11]
G. Oliva, A. Scalone, V. F. Manzillo et al., “Incidence and time course of Leishmania infantum infections examined by parasitological, serologic, and nested-PCR techniques in a cohort of na?ve dogs exposed to three consecutive transmission seasons,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1318–1322, 2006.
[12]
V. F. Manzillo, B. Restucci, A. Pagano, L. Gradoni, and G. Oliva, “Pathological changes in the bone marrow of dogs with leishmaniosis,” Veterinary Record, vol. 158, no. 20, pp. 690–694, 2006.
[13]
Y. Mekuzas, L. Gradoni, G. Oliva, V. Foglia Manzillo, and G. Baneth, “Ehrlichia canis and Leishmania infantum co-infection: a 3-year longitudinal study in naturally exposed dogs,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 30–31, 2009.
[14]
B. E. Melveger, F. L. Earl, and E. J. Van Loon, “Sternal bone marrow biopsy in the dog,” Laboratory animal care, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 866–868, 1969.
[15]
E. J. Van Loon and B. B. Clark, “Hematology of the peripheral blood and bone marrow of the dog,” The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1575–1579, 1943.
[16]
M. L. Wellman and M. J. Radin, Bone Marrow Evaluation in Dogs and Cats. in Veterinary Cytology: Dog, Cat, Horse, Cow, Ralston Purina Clinical Handbook Series, Wilmington, Del, USA, 1999.
[17]
A. Moritz, N. B. Bauer, D. J. Weiss, A. Lanevschi, and A. Saad, “Evaluation of bone marrow,” in Schalm’s Veterinary Hematolology, D. J. Weiss and K. J. Wardrop, Eds., pp. 1054–1066, 6th edition, 2010.
[18]
M. D. Grynpas, A. Acito, M. Dimitriu, B. P. Mertz, and J. M. Very, “Changes in bone mineralization, architecture and mechanical properties due to long-term (1 year) administration of pamidronate (APD) to adult dogs,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 74–81, 1992.
[19]
A. Defarges, A. Abrams-Ogg, R. A. Foster, and D. Bienzle, “Comparison of sternal, iliac, and humeral bone marrow aspiration in Beagles dogs,” Veterinary Clinical Pathology, vol. 42, pp. 170–176, 2013.