全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Short Period of Ventilation without Perfusion Seems to Reduce Atelectasis without Harming the Lungs during Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

DOI: 10.1155/2013/729286

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

To evaluate the lung function of donors after circulatory deaths (DCDs), ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has been shown to be a valuable method. We present modified EVLP where lung atelectasis is removed, while the lung perfusion is temporarily shut down. Twelve pigs were randomized into two groups: modified EVLP and conventional EVLP. When the lungs had reached 37°C in the EVLP circuit, lung perfusion was temporarily shut down in the modified EVLP group, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was increased to 10?cm H2O for 10 minutes. In the conventional EVLP group, PEEP was increased to 10?cm H2O for 10 minutes with unchanged lung perfusion. In the modified EVLP group, the arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) was 18.5 ± 7.0?kPa before and 64.5 ± 6.0?kPa after the maneuver ( ). In the conventional EVLP group, the PaO2 was 16.8 ± 3.1?kPa and 46.8 ± 2.7?kPa after the maneuver ( ; ). In the modified EVLP group, the pulmonary graft weight was unchanged, while in the conventional EVLP group, the pulmonary graft weight was significantly increased. Modified EVLP with normoventilation of the lungs without ongoing lung perfusion for 10 minutes may eliminate atelectasis almost completely without harming the lungs. 1. Introduction Lung transplantation continues to be hampered by the number of available donors [1, 2]. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has emerged as an essential tool for the reassessment, under a controlled scenario, of lungs from heart-beating donors (HBDs) that initially did not meet transplantation criteria [3–8]. The method is also an excellent tool for reassessing lungs of donors after cardiac death (DCD) [9, 10]. The use of DCD lungs has gained much interest lately. DCDs are classified according to the Maastricht classification and may be subdivided as controlled and uncontrolled [11]. Often the controlled DCDs are of interest since these patients are under hospital care, and their clinical history and lung function are known. It is also logistically easier to handle these donors. These controlled donors are, however, limited in number compared with the potential numbers of uncontrolled DCDs. The disadvantage of using lungs from uncontrolled donors, however, is that lung function is not known and has to be validated before the lungs can be accepted for transplant. There are also some issues regarding the optimal preservation of uncontrolled donor lungs such as how long warm ischemic time the lungs can withstand and whether it is better to harvest the lungs after the period of warm ischemia or cool the lungs inside the deceased body. These

References

[1]  T. M. Egan, C. J. Lambert Jr., R. Reddick, K. S. Ulicny Jr., B. A. Keagy, and B. R. Wilcox, “A strategy to increase the donor pool: use of cadaver lungs for transplantation,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1113–1121, 1991.
[2]  J. M. Smits, W. van der Bij, D. van Raemdonck et al., “Defining an extended criteria donor lung: an empirical approach based on the Eurotransplant experience,” Transplant International, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 393–400, 2011.
[3]  P. G. Sanchez, G. J. Bittle, L. Burdorf, R. N. Pierson III, and B. P. Griffith, “State of art: clinical ex vivo lung perfusion: rationale, current status, and future directions,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 339–348, 2012.
[4]  S. Lindstedt, J. Hlebowicz, B. Koul et al., “Comparative outcome of double lung transplantation using conventional donor lungs and non-acceptable donor lungs reconditioned ex vivo,” Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 162–165, 2011.
[5]  S. Lindstedt, A. Eyjolfsson, B. Koul et al., “How to recondition ex vivo initially rejected donor lungs for clinical transplantation: clinical experience from Lund University Hospital,” Journal of Transplantation, vol. 2011, Article ID 754383, 7 pages, 2011.
[6]  M. Cypel, J. C. Yeung, M. Liu et al., “NOrmothermic ex vivo lung perfusion in clinical lung transplantation,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 15, pp. 1431–1440, 2011.
[7]  M. Cypel, J. C. Yeung, and S. Keshavjee, “Novel approaches to expanding the lung donor pool: donation after cardiac death and ex vivo conditioning,” Clinics in Chest Medicine, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 233–244, 2011.
[8]  S. Steen, Q. Liao, P. N. Wierup, R. Bolys, L. Pierre, and T. Sj?berg, “Transplantation of lungs from non-heart-beating donors after functional assessment ex vivo,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 244–252, 2003.
[9]  B. Domínguez-Gil, B. Haase-Kromwijk, H. van Leiden et al., “Current situation of donation after circulatory death in European countries,” Transplant International, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 676–686, 2011.
[10]  S. Steen, T. Sj?berg, L. Pierre, Q. Liao, L. Eriksson, and L. Algotsson, “Transplantation of lungs from a non-heart-beating donor,” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9259, pp. 825–829, 2001.
[11]  G. Kootstra, J. H. C. Daemen, and A. P. A. Oomen, “Categories of non-heart-beating donors,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2893–2894, 1995.
[12]  D. F. Dilling and A. R. Glanville, “Advances in lung transplantation: the year in review,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 247–251, 2011.
[13]  S. de Vleeschauwer, D. van Raemdonck, B. Vanaudenaerde et al., “Early outcome after lung transplantation from non-heart-beating donors is comparable to heart-beating donors,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 380–387, 2009.
[14]  S. I. De Vleeschauwer, S. Wauters, L. J. Dupont et al., “Medium-term outcome after lung transplantation is comparable between brain-dead and cardiac-dead donors,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 975–981, 2011.
[15]  R. Ingemansson, A. Eyjolfsson, L. Mared et al., “Clinical transplantation of initially rejected Donor Lungs after reconditioning ex vivo,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 255–260, 2009.
[16]  S. Steen, R. Ingemansson, L. Eriksson et al., “First human transplantation of a nonacceptable donor lung after reconditioning ex vivo,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 2191–2194, 2007.
[17]  M. Cypel, J. C. Yeung, S. Hirayama et al., “Technique for prolonged normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1319–1325, 2008.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133