The lowest energy geometric structures and electronic spin states of first row transition metal (TM) dioxygen dication molecules ([TM–O2]2+; TM = Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) have been determined at the B3LYP/LANL2DZ level of theory (along with an extra -type polarization function added to the O atoms). In order to further verify the spin states, CASSCF(6 + , 9) energy points were determined ( = number of TM electrons). It has been found that with the exception of [Sc–O2]2+, [V–O2]2+, [Co–O2]2+, and [Ni–O2]2+, all [TM–O2]2+ molecules take on a high-spin state. [Sc–O2]2+ adopts a trigonal structure, while [Ti–O2]2+-[Mn–O2]2+ are essentially linear and [Fe–O2]2+-[Zn–O2]2+ are bent. It is further noted that the O–O bond decreases from 130.0?pm to 118.1?pm as the TM changes from Sc to Zn. However, the TM–O2 bond lengths fluctuate between values of 182.2?pm for [Ni–O2]2+ and 232.2?pm for [Zn–O2]2+. 1. Introduction Transition metals (TMs) bound to an O2 molecule are the chemically active site in many industrial [1–5] and biological [1, 2, 6–10] molecules. Considering the TM–O2 bond to lie along the -axis of a Cartesian coordinate system, in TM–O2 complexes, bonds can form by the interactions of TM , , and atomic orbitals with suitable orbitals on the O2 ligand in order to make ( ) or ( and ) bonds (Scheme 1). While there have been numerous studies of neutral TM–O2 [11, 12] complexes, in many TM–O2 containing molecules of biological and industrial importance, the TM is bound to a porphyrin ring in the 2? oxidation state. Therefore, [TM–O2]2+ molecules are the simplest approximations to this important class of TM–O2 containing molecules. Scheme 1 Probably the most studied TM–O2 bond is the Fe–O2 bond due to its role in heme-containing proteins [13–16]. This bond has been described as low-spin Fe(II) accepting an electron pair from excited singlet-state O2 forming the bond, while donating an electron pair to oxygen to form a bond. An alternative view involves Fe(III) interacting with O2?. In a third possibility, triplet Fe(II) couples with triplet O2 to form a closed shell singlet. Computational results vary depending on the extent of electron correlation and basis set size. It is clear, however, that the overall bonding scheme involves some degree of both O2 Fe and Fe O2?? and electron transfer. Further complicating matters, the number of near degenerate TM -orbitals leads to the possibility of many low lying spin states. In addition, there are a number of different ways that the O2 unit can be arranged relative to the TM. Herein, we seek to
References
[1]
A. L. Feig and S. J. Lippard, “Reactions of non-heme iron(II) centers with dioxygen in biology and chemistry,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 759–805, 1994.
[2]
N. Kitajima and Y. Moro-oka, “Copper-dioxygen complexes. Inorganic and bioinorganic perspectives,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 737–757, 1994.
[3]
J. Muzart, “Chromium-catalyzed oxidations in organic synthesis,” Journal of Chemical Reviews, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 113–140, 1992.
[4]
D. Dolphin, T. G. Traylor, and L. Y. Xie, “Polyhaloporphyrins: unusual ligands for metals and metal-catalyzed oxidations,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 251–259, 1997.
[5]
D. H. Busch and N. W. Alcock, “Iron and cobalt “lacunar ” complexes as dioxygen carriers,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 585–623, 1994.
[6]
G. H. Loew and D. Harris, “Role of the heme active site and protein environment in structure, spectra, and function of the cytochrome P450s,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 407–420, 2000.
[7]
A. Butler, M. J. Clague, and G. E. Meister, “Vanadium peroxide complexes,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 625–638, 1994.
[8]
K. Shikama, “The molecular mechanism of autoxidation for myoglobin and hemoglobin:? A venerable puzzle,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1357–1374, 1998.
[9]
M. H. Dickman and M. T. Pope, “Peroxo and superoxo complexes of chromium, molybdenum, and tungsten,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 569–584, 1994.
[10]
J. P. Collman and L. Fu, “Synthetic models for hemoglobin and myoglobin,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 455–463, 1992.
[11]
E. L. Uzunova, H. Mikosh, and G. St. Nikolov, “Electronic structure of oxide, peroxide, and superoxide clusters of the 3d elements: a comparative density functional study,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 128, Article ID 094307, 2008.
[12]
Y. Gong, M. Zhou, and L. Andrews, “Spectroscopic and theoretical studies of transition metal oxides and dioxygen complexes,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 109, no. 12, pp. 6765–6808, 2009.
[13]
I. Bytheway and M. B. Hall, “Theoretical calculations of metal-dioxygen complexes,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 639–658, 1994.
[14]
B. D. Olafson and W. A. Goddard III, “Molecular description of dioxygen bonding in hemoglobin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 1315–1319, 1977.
[15]
W. A. Goddard and B. D. Olafson, “Ozone model for bonding of an O2 to heme in oxyhemoglobin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 2335–2339, 1975.
[16]
H. Chen, M. Ikeda-Saito, and S. Shaik, “Nature of the Fe-O2 bonding in oxy-myoglobin: effect of the protein,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 44, pp. 14778–14790, 2008.
[17]
A. D. Becke, “Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 98, pp. 5648–5653, 1993.
[18]
B. Miehlich, A. S. Savin, and H. Preuss, “Results obtained with the correlation energy density functionals of becke and Lee, Yang and Parr,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 200–206, 1989.
[19]
C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, “Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation energy formula into a functional of the electron density,” Physical Review B, vol. 37, pp. 785–789, 1988.
[20]
P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, “Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for the transition metal atoms Sc to Hg,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 82, p. 270, 1985.
[21]
W. R. Wadt and P. J. Hay, “Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for main group elements Na to Bi,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 284–298, 1985.
[22]
P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, “Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for K to Au including the outermost core orbitals,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 82, pp. 299–311, 1985.
[23]
C. E. Check, T. O. Faust, T. M. Bailey, B. J. Wright, T. M. Gilberrt, and L. S. Snderlin, “Addition of polarization and diffuse functions to the LANL2DZ basis set for P-block elements,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 105, no. 34, pp. 8111–8116, 2001.
[24]
D. Hegarty and M. A. Robb, “Application of unitary group methods to configuration interaction calculations,” Molecular Physics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1795–1812, 1979.
[25]
R. H. E. Eade and M. A. Robb, “Direct minimization in mc scf theory. The quasi-newton method,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 362–368, 1981.
[26]
H. B. Schlegel and M. A. Robb, “MC SCF gradient optimization of the transition structure,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 43–46, 1982.
[27]
F. Bernardi, A. Bottini, J. J. W. McDougall, M. A. Robb, and H. B. Schlegel, “MCSCF gradient calculation of transition structures in organic reactions,” Faraday Symposia of the Chemical Society, vol. 19, pp. 137–147, 1984.
[28]
N. Yamamoto, T. Vreven, M. A. Robb, M. J. Frisch, and H. B. Schlegel, “A direct derivative MC-SCF procedure,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 250, no. 3-4, pp. 373–378, 1996.
[29]
M. J. Frisch, I. N. Ragazos, M. A. Robb, and H. B. Schlegel, “An evaluation of three direct MC-SCF procedures,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 189, no. 6, pp. 524–528, 1992.
[30]
Gaussian 03, Revision D. 02, M. J. Frisch et al., Wallingford, CT, 2003.