The single contour cantilever beam (SCCB) test method has been developed with the intent to capture Mode I opening failures of CFRP-reinforced concrete beams. Recent development in the method explores possible shifting damage into the concrete substrate by using the International Concrete Repair Institute (ICRI) Surface Profile Level Three (SP3) as the desired CFRP bonded interface to concrete. To validate and explain the interface fracture behavior, finite element analysis using special cohesive elements has been performed. The cohesive element allows separation of the concrete substrate from the CFRP. This paper presents the simulation of laboratory test results, where failure in the substrates has been successfully reproduced. The simulation results indicate that finite element method using cohesive elements can successfully replicate Mode I critical strain energy release rate and the peak capacity of the laboratory tests and may have the potential to simulate actual applications. 1. Introduction Several laboratory methodologies have been developed over the past few years to measure Mode I critical strain energy release rate involving composite wrapped concrete beams. Failures of representative methodologies designed to isolate Mode I opening failure of a fracture interface include the modified double cantilever beam (DCB) method [1], the peel test method [2], the membrane peeling method [3], and the single contour cantilever beam (SCCB) method [4]. All the above methods are variations of each other with different strengths and weaknesses, depending on the application. However, the SCCB method exclusively ensures that the failure will always be the first mode. A second advantage of the SCCB method is the elimination of compliance measurements. The SCCB method was first developed by Boyajian [5] and has been utilized to determine the critical strain energy release rates at the bonding interface between concrete and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) [4, 6, 7]. Figure 1 shows the schematics of the SCCB test including the test specimen that consists of concrete base plate, CFRP bonded layer, the wood contour, and the experimental setup that includes a steel strap for pulling on the wood contour. Figure 2(a) shows the actual test setup within a MTS test apparatus with arrow indicating the direction of pull load. With the SCCB test, the high tensile capacity LVL is loaded with a normal force, P, inducing Mode I failure behavior of the CFRP to concrete interface and thus avoiding the arm break-off failure. The starter crack is created by debonding the
References
[1]
V. Giurgiutiu, J. Lyons, M. Petrou, D. Laub, and S. Whitley, “Fracture mechanics testing of the bond between composite overlays and a concrete substrate,” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1351–1371, 2001.
[2]
V. M. Karbhari and M. Engineer, “Investigation of bond between concrete and composites: use of a peel test,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 208–227, 1996.
[3]
I. Kimpara, K. Kageyama, T. Suzuki, I. Osawa, and K. Yamaguchi, “Characterization of debonding energy release rate of FRP sheets bonded on mortar and concrete,” Advanced Composite Materials, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 177–187, 1999.
[4]
D. M. Boyajian, J. F. Davalos, and I. Ray, “Evaluation of interface fracture of concrete externally reinforced with FRP,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Durability of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Construction (CDCC), Montreal, Canada, 2002.
[5]
D. M. Boyajian, Mode I fracture and durability of the CFRP-concrete interface bond [Ph.D. thesis], West Virginia University, 2002.
[6]
S. S. Kodkani, Interface durability of externally bonded GFRP to normal and high-performance concrete [M.S. thesis], West Virginia University, 2004.
[7]
T. O. Lawrence and D. M. Boyajian, “Surface roughness, quasi-static fracture, and cyclic fatigue effects on GFRP- And CFRP-concrete bonded interfaces,” Journal of ASTM International, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2006.
[8]
International Concrete Repair Institute, Concrete Surface Preparation for Fiber Reinforced Polymers, International Concrete Repair Institute, Des Plains, Ill, USA, 2003.
[9]
O. Buyukozturk, O. Gunes, and E. Karaca, “Progress on understanding debonding problems in reinforced concrete and steel members strengthened using FRP composites,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2004.
[10]
J. P. Berry, “Determination of fracture surface energies by the cleavage technique,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 1963.
[11]
A. Boresi, R. J. Schmidt, and O. M. Sidebottom, Advanced Mechanics of Material, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 5th edition, 1993.
[12]
A. Turon, C. G. Dávila, P. P. Camanho, and J. Costa, “An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1665–1682, 2007.
[13]
G. R. Irwin, “Fracture,” in Encyclopedia of Physics, S. Flugge, Ed., vol. 6, pp. 551–590, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1958.
[14]
G. R. Irwin and J. A. Kies, “Critical energy rate analysis of fracture strength,” Welding Journal Research Supplement, vol. 33, pp. 193s–198s, 1954.
[15]
T. Nicholas, Mode 1 fatigue and fracture of the carbon fiber reinforced plastic to concrete bond interface region [Ph.D. thesis], University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2010.
[16]
D. Huang and J. Lyons, “Finite element analysis of test specimens to assess composite—concrete bond durability,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 1387–1405, 2005.
[17]
T. Diehl, “On using a penalty-based cohesive-zone finite element approach—part I: elastic solution benchmarks,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 28, no. 4-5, pp. 237–255, 2008.
[18]
ABAQUS Finite Element Code, Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc., Providence, RI, USA, 2007.
[19]
K. Duan, X. Z. Hu, and F. H. Wittmann, “Size effect on specific fracture energy of concrete,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 74, no. 1-2, pp. 87–96, 2007.
[20]
A. M. Ibrahim and M. S. Mahmood, “Finite element modeling of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with FRP laminates,” European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 526–541, 2009.