This paper develops a distribution-free (or nonparametric) Shewhart-type statistical quality control chart for detecting a broad change in the probability distribution of a process. The proposed chart is designed for grouped observations, and it requires the availability of a reference (or training) sample of observations taken when the process was operating in-control. The charting statistic is a modified version of the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistic that allows the exact calculation of the conditional average run length using the binomial distribution. Unlike the traditional distribution-based control charts (such as the Shewhart X-Bar), the proposed chart maintains the same control limits and the in-control average run length over the class of all (symmetric or asymmetric) continuous probability distributions. The proposed chart aims at monitoring a broad, rather than a one-parameter, change in a process distribution. Simulation studies show that the chart is more robust against increased skewness and/or outliers in the process output. Further, the proposed chart is shown to be more efficient than the Shewhart X-Bar chart when the underlying process distribution has tails heavier than those of the normal distribution. 1. Introduction Most traditional statistical quality control charts assume that the monitored process has a prespecified known probability distribution (usually normal for continuous measurements). Consequently, the chart properties (control limits, false alarm rate, and the in-control average run length) would be in error if the process distribution were missspecified. To remedy this, a number of distribution-free (or nonparametric) schemes that maintain the same chart properties over a class of distributions have been proposed in the literature. For an overview of nonparametric control charts, see Chakraborti et al. [1, 2]. Another problem is that traditional control charts aim at monitoring a change in one parameter (usually a location or scale) of a process distribution. Realistically, however, when a special cause influences a process, it may cause a shift in more than one parameter (location, scale, skewness, etc.) of the process distribution. To remedy this, we need control charts designed to monitor a broad rather than a one-parameter change in a process distribution. To our knowledge, Bakir [3] was first to suggest such charts based on the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov and the Cramer-von Mises statistics. Zou and Tsung [4] proposed a nonparametric likelihood ratio chart for monitoring broad changes in a process
References
[1]
S. Chakraborti, P. van der Laan, and S. T. Bakir, “Nonparametric control charts: an overview and some results,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 304–315, 2001.
[2]
S. Chakraborti and M. A. Graham, “Nonparametric control charts,” in Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
[3]
S. T. Bakir, “Quality control charts for detecting a general change in a process,” in Proceedings of the Section on Quality and Productivity (ASA '97), pp. 53–56, American Statistical Association, 1997.
[4]
C. Zou and F. Tsung, “Likelihood ratio-based distribution-free EWMA control charts,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 174–196, 2010.
[5]
G. J. Ross and N. M. Adams, “Two nonparametric control charts for detecting arbitrary distribution changes,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 102–116, 2012.
[6]
C. Park and M. R. Reynolds Jr., “Nonparametric procedures for monitoring a location parametric based on linear placement statistics,” Sequential Analysis, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 303–323, 1987.
[7]
J. Orban and D. A. Wolfe, “A class of distribution-free two-sample tests based on placements,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 77, pp. 666–670, 1982.
[8]
P. Hackl and J. Ledolter, “A control chart based on ranks,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 23, pp. 117–124, 1991.
[9]
T. R. Willemain and G. C. Runger, “Designing control charts using an empirical reference distribution,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 1996.
[10]
S. Chakraborti, P. van der Laan, and M. A. van de Wiel, “A class of distribution-free control charts,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society C, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 443–462, 2004.
[11]
W. J. Conover, Practical Nonparametric Statistics, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1999.
[12]
S. Chakraborti, “Run length, average run length and false alarm rate of shewhart X-bar chart: exact derivations by conditioning,” Communications in Statistics Part B, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 61–81, 2000.
[13]
S. Chakraborti, “Parameter estimation and design considerations in prospective applications of the chart,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 439–459, 2006.
[14]
M. B. Vermaat, R. A. Ion, R. J. M. M. Does, and C. A. J. Klaassen, “A comparison of Shewhart individuals control charts based on normal, non-parametric, and extreme-value theory,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 337–353, 2003.
[15]
W. A. Jensen, L. A. Jones-Farmer, C. W. Champ, and W. H. Woodall, “Effects of parameter estimation on control chart properties: a literature review,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 349–364, 2006.
[16]
N. L. Johnson, S. Kotz, and N. Balakrishnan, Continuous Univariate Distributions, vol. 2, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1995.