全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Parameter Estimation for Type III Discrete Weibull Distribution: A Comparative Study

DOI: 10.1155/2013/946562

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The type III discrete Weibull distribution can be used in reliability analysis for modeling failure data such as the number of shocks, cycles, or runs a component or a structure can overcome before failing. This paper describes three methods for estimating its parameters: two customary techniques and a technique particularly suitable for discrete distributions, which, in contrast to the two other techniques, provides analytical estimates, whose derivation is detailed here. The techniques’ peculiarities and practical limits are outlined. A Monte Carlo simulation study has been performed to assess the statistical performance of these methods for different parameter combinations and sample sizes and then give some indication for their mindful use. Two applications of real data are provided with the aim of showing how the type III discrete Weibull distribution can fit real data, even better than other popular discrete models, and how the inferential procedures work. A software implementation of the model is also provided. 1. Introduction Most reliability studies assume that time is continuous, and continuous probability distributions such as exponential, gamma, Weibull, normal, and lognormal are commonly used to model the lifetime of a component or a structure. These distributions and the methods for estimating their parameters are well known. In many practical situations, however, lifetime is not measured with calendar time: for example, when a machine works in cycles or on demands and the number of cycles or demands before failure is observed; or when the regular operation of a system is monitored once per period, and the number of time periods successfully completed is observed. Moreover, reliability data are often grouped into classes or truncated according to some censoring criterion. In all these cases, lifetime is modeled as a discrete random variable (r.v.). Indeed, not much work has been done in discrete reliability. Generally, most reliability concepts for continuous lifetimes have been adapted to the discrete case; in particular, discrete analogues of continuous distributions have been introduced [1]. In this context, geometric and negative binomial distributions are the corresponding discrete alternatives for the exponential and gamma distributions, respectively. Yet, discrete lifetime distributions can be defined without any reference to a continuous counterpart. Bracquemond and Gaudoin [2] provided an exhaustive survey on discrete lifetime distributions. The (two-parameter) continuous Weibull distribution is one of the most widely used

References

[1]  A. Khalique, “On discrete failure-time distributions,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 99–107, 1989.
[2]  C. Bracquemond and O. Gaudoin, “A survey on discrete lifetime distributions,” International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 69–98, 2003.
[3]  D. N. Prabhakar Murthy, M. Xie, and R. Jiang, Weibull Models, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004.
[4]  T. Nakagawa and S. Osaki, “The discrete Weibull distribution,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 300–301, 1975.
[5]  W. E. Stein and R. Dattero, “A new discrete Weibull distribution,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 196–197, 1984.
[6]  W. J. Padgett and J. D. Spurrier, “Discrete failure models,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 253–256, 1985.
[7]  H. Rinne, The Weibull Distribution—A Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2009.
[8]  D. Roy and T. Dasgupta, “Evaluation of reliability of complex systems by means of a discretizing approach Weibull set-up,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 792–801, 2002.
[9]  M. S. A. Khan, A. Khalique, and A. M. Abouammoh, “On estimating parameters in a discrete Weibull distribution,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 348–350, 1989.
[10]  M. A. Jazi, C.-D. Lai, and M. H. Alamatsaz, “A discrete inverse Weibull distribution and estimation of its parameters,” Statistical Methodology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 121–132, 2010.
[11]  R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2011.
[12]  A. Barbiero, “DiscreteWeibull: Discrete Weibull distribution,” R package version 1.0, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DiscreteWeibull, 2013.
[13]  A. P. Nikora and M. R. Lyu, “Software reliability measurement experience,” in Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering, M. R. Lyu, Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
[14]  M. Greenwood and G. U. Yule, “An enquiry into the nature of frequency distributions representative of multiple happenings,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, vol. 83, pp. 255–279, 1920.
[15]  P. C. Consul and G. C. Jain, “A generalization of the Poisson distribution,” Technometrics, vol. 15, pp. 791–799, 1973.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133