全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Common Fixed Point Theorems for Conversely Commuting Mappings Using Implicit Relations

DOI: 10.1155/2013/391474

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The object of this paper is to utilize the notion of conversely commuting mappings due to Lü (2002) and prove some common fixed point theorems in Menger spaces via implicit relations. We give some examples which demonstrate the validity of the hypotheses and degree of generality of our main results. 1. Introduction In 1986, Jungck [1] introduced the notion of compatible mappings in metric space. Most of the common fixed point theorems for contraction mappings invariably require a compatibility condition besides continuity of at least one of the mappings. Later on, Jungck and Rhoades [2] studied the notion of weakly compatible mappings and utilized it as a tool to improve commutativity conditions in common fixed point theorems. Many mathematicians proved several fixed point results in Menger spaces (see, e.g., [3–9]). In 2002, Lü [10] presented the concept of the converse commuting mappings as a reverse process of weakly compatible mappings and proved common fixed point theorems for single-valued mappings in metric spaces (also see [11]). Recently, Pathak and Verma [12, 13], Chugh et al. [14], and Chauhan et al. [15] proved some interesting common fixed point theorems for converse commuting mappings. In this paper, we prove some unique common fixed point theorems for two pairs of converse commuting mappings in Menger spaces by using implicit relations. 2. Preliminaries Definition 1 (see [16]). A?? -norm is a function satisfying(T1) ,?? ;(T2) ;(T3) for ,?? ;(T4) for all ,?? ,?? in . Examples of -norms are , , and . Definition 2 (see [16]). A real valued function on the set of real numbers is called a distribution function if it is nondecreasing, left continuous with and . We shall denote by the set of all distribution functions defined on , while will always denote the specific distribution function defined by If is a nonempty set, is called a probabilistic distance on and the value of at is represented by . Definition 3 (see [17]). A probabilistic metric space is an ordered pair , where is a nonempty set of elements and is a probabilistic distance satisfying the following conditions: for all and , (1) for all if and only if ;(2) ;(3) ;(4)if and , then for all and . Every metric space can always be realized as a probabilistic metric space by considering defined by for all and . So probabilistic metric spaces offer a wider framework than that of metric spaces and are better suited to cover even wider statistical situations; that is, every metric space can be regarded as a probabilistic metric space of a special kind. Definition 4 (see [16]). A Menger space

References

[1]  G. Jungck, “Compatible mappings and common fixed points,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 771–779, 1986.
[2]  G. Jungck and B. E. Rhoades, “Fixed points for set valued functions without continuity,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 227–238, 1998.
[3]  S. Chauhan and B. D. Pant, “Common fixed point theorem for weakly compatible mappings in Menger space,” Journal of Advanced Research in Pure Mathematics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 107–119, 2011.
[4]  M. Imdad, J. Ali, and M. Tanveer, “Coincidence and common fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in Menger PM spaces,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 3121–3129, 2009.
[5]  D. Mihe?, “A note on a common fixed point theorem in probabilistic metric spaces,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 125, no. 1-2, pp. 127–130, 2009.
[6]  B. D. Pant and S. Chauhan, “A contraction theorem in Menger space,” Tamkang Journal of Mathematics, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 2011.
[7]  B. D. Pant and S. Chauhan, “Common fixed point theorems for two pairs of weakly compatible mappings in Menger spaces and fuzzy metric spaces,” Scientific Studies and Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 81–96, 2011.
[8]  B. D. Pant, S. Chauhan, and Q. Alam, “Common fixed point theorem in probabilistic metric space,” Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 463–470, 2011.
[9]  R. Saadati, D. O'Regan, S. M. Vaezpour, and J. K. Kim, “Generalized distance and common fixed point theorems in Menger probabilistic metric spaces,” Iranian Mathematical Society, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 97–117, 2009.
[10]  Z. X. Lü, “Common fixed points for converse commuting selfmaps on a metric space,” Acta Analysis Functionalis Applicata., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 226–228, 2002 (Chinese).
[11]  Q. K. Liu and X. Q. Hu, “Some new common fixed point theorems for converse commuting multi-valued mappings in symmetric spaces with applications,” Nonlinear Analysis Forum, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 97–104, 2005.
[12]  H. K. Pathak and R. K. Verma, “Integral type contractive condition for converse commuting mappings,” International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, vol. 3, no. 21–24, pp. 1183–1190, 2009.
[13]  H. K. Pathak and R. K. Verma, “An integral type implicit relation for converse commuting mappings,” International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, vol. 3, no. 21–24, pp. 1191–1198, 2009.
[14]  R. Chugh, Sumitra, and M. Alamgir Khan, “Common fixed point theorems for converse commuting maps in fuzzy metric spaces,” Journal for Theory and Applications, vol. 6, no. 37–40, pp. 1845–1851, 2011.
[15]  S. Chauhan, M. A. Khan, and W. Sintunavarat, “Fixed points of converse commuting mappings using an implicit relation,” Honam Mathematical Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 109–117, 2013.
[16]  B. Schweizer and A. Sklar, “Statistical metric spaces,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, pp. 313–334, 1960.
[17]  K. Menger, “Statistical metrics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 28, pp. 535–537, 1942.
[18]  S. N. Mishra, “Common fixed points of compatible mappings in PM-spaces,” Mathematica Japonica, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 283–289, 1991.
[19]  B. Singh and S. Jain, “Semicompatibility and fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric space using implicit relation,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, no. 16, pp. 2617–2629, 2005.
[20]  M. Imdad and J. Ali, “A general fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces via implicit function,” Journal of Applied Mathematics & Informatics, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 591–603, 2008.
[21]  V. Popa, “A fixed point theorem for mapping in d-complete topological spaces,” Mathematica Moravica, vol. 3, pp. 43–48, 1999.
[22]  S. Chauhan, M. Imdad, and C. Vetro, “Unified metrical common fixed point theorems in 2-metric spaces via an implicit relation,” Journal of Operators, vol. 2013, Article ID 186910, 11 pages, 2013.
[23]  S. Chauhan, M. A. Khan, and S. Kumar, “Unified fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces via common limit range property,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2013, article 182, 17 pages, 2013.
[24]  S. Chauhan and B. D. Pant, “Fixed points of weakly compatible mappings using common (E.A) like property,” Le Matematiche, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 99–116, 2013.
[25]  M. Imdad and S. Chauhan, “Employing common limit range property to prove unified metrical common fixed point theorems,” International Journal of Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 763261, 10 pages, 2013.
[26]  S. Kumar and S. Chauhan, “Common fixed point theorems using implicit relation and property (E.A) in fuzzy metric spaces,” Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2013.
[27]  S. Kumar and B. D. Pant, “Common fixed point theorems in probabilistic metric spaces using implicit relation and property (E.A),” Bulletin of the Allahabad Mathematical Society, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 223–235, 2010.
[28]  V. Popa and D. Turko?lu, “Some fixed point theorems for hybrid contractions satisfying an implicit relation,” Studii ?i Cercet?ri ?tiin?ifice, no. 8, pp. 75–86, 1998.
[29]  S. Sharma and B. Deshpande, “On compatible mappings satisfying an implicit relation in common fixed point consideration,” Tamkang Journal of Mathematics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 245–252, 2002.
[30]  D. Gopal, M. Imdad, and C. Vetro, “Impact of common property (E.A.) on fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2011, Article ID 297360, 14 pages, 2011.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133