全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Hydrogen Bonds between Acidic Protons from Alkynes (C–H···O) and Amides (N–H···O) and Carbonyl Oxygen Atoms as Acceptor Partners

DOI: 10.1155/2014/371629

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Crystals of tert-butyl (2S)-2-(prop-2-yn-1-ylcarbamoyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (Boc-L-Pro-NHCH2CCH) have been obtained. The title compound crystallizes easily as sharp needles in orthorhombic system, space group P 21 21 21 with a = 9.2890(2), b = 9.7292(2), c = 15.7918(4)??, V = 1427.18(6)??3, and Z = 4. The main feature of the structure is the orientation of the carbamate and amide. Their dipoles add up and the molecule displays an electric dipole moment of 5.61?D from B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations. The antiparallel H bonding of amides and the alignment of dipoles induce columnar stacking (the dipole moment along the columnar a axis is 4.46?D for each molecule). The other components across the other axes are, therefore weaker, (3.17?D and 1.23?D along the b and c axes, resp.). The resulting anisotropic columns pack side by side, in an antiparallel fashion mostly by (alkyne) CH···O=C (carbamate) interactions. 1. Introduction The design of organic solid (crystal or supramolecular engineering) is still today challenging and of great importance [1, 2]. Understanding the details of weak intermolecular interactions plays definitely a major role in the rational design of ordered organic crystals. In our lab, we already achieved great molecular macroscopic order with specially designed peptides, macrocycles as precursors to organic nanotubes [3–5] or supramolecular walls [6]. Here, we present the crystal structure of the proline derivative 1 (Figure 1) which alkyne, amide, and carbamate functionalities are all involved in hydrogen bonding. Figure 1: Structure of the proline derivative 1 (Boc-L-ProNHCH 2CCH). 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Synthesis To Boc-L-proline N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (2.0?g, 6.4?mmol) in CH2Cl2 (40?mL) was added, at 0°C, propargylamine (0.46?g, 8.4?mmol) and K2CO3 (1.43?g, 10.3?mmol). The reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to RT and was stirred for 72?h. Water (30?mL) was added and the organic phase was isolated. The remaining aqueous layer was extracted again with CH2Cl2 ( ?mL). The combined organic layers were filtrated through a cotton plug and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel, eluted with Et2O/Hexane (75?:?25), to yield the title product as a white solid (1.654?g, 78%). (Et2O/Hexane 75?:?25); Tfus (108–111°C); IR (NaCl, ? cm?1): 3242, 3055, 2982, 2288, 2117, 1688, 1536, 1402, 1324, 1258, 919, 885, and 718. NMR1H (300?MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 6.20 (br, 1H), 4.30–3.90 (m, 3H), 3.50–3.30 (m, 2H), 2.40–2.00 (m, 2H), 2.20 (brs, 1H), 2.00–1.80 (m, 2H), and 1.45

References

[1]  K. Biradha, C. Su, and J. J. Vittal, “Recent developments in crystal engineering,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 875–886, 2011.
[2]  G. R. Desiraju, “Crystal engineering: from molecule to crystal,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 135, no. 27, pp. 9952–9967, 2013.
[3]  D. Gauthier, P. Baillargeon, M. Drouin, and Y. L. Dory, “Self-Assembly of cyclic peptides into nanotubes and then into highly anisotropic crystalline materials,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 40, no. 24, pp. 4635–4638, 2001.
[4]  D. Pasini and M. Ricci, “Macrocycles as precursors for organic nanotubes,” Current Organic Synthesis, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 59–80, 2007.
[5]  P. Baillargeon, S. Bernard, D. Gauthier, R. Skouta, and Y. L. Dory, “Efficient synthesis and astonishing supramolecular architectures of several symmetric macrolactams,” Chemistry A, vol. 13, no. 33, pp. 9223–9235, 2007.
[6]  P. Baillargeon and Y. L. Dory, “Supramolecular walls from cyclic peptides: modulating nature and strength of weak interactions,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 3638–3645, 2009.
[7]  T. Steiner, “The hydrogen bond in the solid state,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 48–76, 2002.
[8]  T. Steiner and G. R. Desiraju, “Distinction between the weak hydrogen bond and the van der Waals interaction,” Chemical Communications, no. 8, pp. 891–892, 1998.
[9]  G. R. Desiraju, “Strength and linearity of C–H···O bonds in molecular crystals: a database study of some terminal alkynes,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, pp. 454–455, 1990.
[10]  C. H. Schwalbe, “June Sutor and the C–H···O hydrogen bonding controversy,” Crystallography Reviews, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 191–206, 2012.
[11]  J. Bernstein, “It isn’t,” Crystal Growth & Design, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 961–964, 2013.
[12]  G. R. Desiraju, “The C–H···O hydrogen bond in crystals: what is it?” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 290–296, 1991.
[13]  G. R. Desiraju, “Hydrogen bridges in crystal engineering:? interactions without borders,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 565–573, 2002.
[14]  G. R. Desiraju, “C–H···O and other weak hydrogen bonds. From crystal engineering to virtual screening,” Chemical Communications, no. 24, pp. 2995–3001, 2005.
[15]  C. R. Jones, P. K. Baruah, A. L. Thompson, S. Scheiner, and M. D. Smith, “Can a C–H···O interaction be a determinant of conformation?” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, no. 29, pp. 12064–12071, 2012.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133