Background. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer registries in Northern Ireland (NI) and Republic of Ireland (RoI). Cancers in the two countries were compared using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for age and age plus area-based SES. Results. Adjusting for SES in addition to age had a considerable impact on NI/RoI comparisons for cancers strongly related to SES. Before SES adjustment, lung cancer incidence rates were 11% higher for males and 7% higher for females in NI, while after adjustment, the IRR was not statistically significant. Cervical cancer rates were lower in NI than in RoI after adjustment for age (IRR: 0.90 (0.84–0.97)), with this difference increasing after adjustment for SES (IRR: 0.85 (0.79–0.92)). For cancers with a weak or nonexistent relationship to SES, adjustment for SES made little difference to the IRR. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors explain some international variations but also obscure other crucial differences; thus, adjustment for these factors should not become part of international comparisons. 1. Introduction International comparisons of cancer incidence highlight considerable differences in incidence rates between various countries [1]. The incidence rates in these studies are routinely age-adjusted due to the relationship between cancer and age and the variation between countries in their demographic makeup. It has been well established that socioeconomic status (SES) also influences the incidence rate of many types of cancer [2]. However, it is not usual to take into account the relationship between cancer and SES in international comparisons. The Republic of Ireland (RoI) and Northern Ireland (NI) are the only two countries on the island of Ireland, although NI is one of the constituent countries making up the United Kingdom. Recent studies have shown differences between the two countries in incidence rates for lung, bladder, brain, prostate, cervical, uterine and male colorectal cancer, leukaemia, and female melanoma [3]. This is despite the proximity of the two countries and their similar demographics and proportion of different ethnic groups [4, 5]. Additionally in the 2001 NI [4] and 2002 RoI censuses [5] 40% of the NI 16–74-year-old population was economically inactive compared to 34% in RoI, while of the economically active population 7% in NI was unemployed
References
[1]
J. Ferlay, H. Shin, F. Bray, D. Forman, C. Mathers, and D. M. Parkin, “Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 2893–2917, 2010.
[2]
F. Faggiano, T. Partanen, M. Kogevinas, and P. Boffetta, “Socioeconomic differences in cancer incidence and mortality,” IARC Scientific Publications, no. 138, pp. 65–176, 1997.
[3]
D. Donnelly, H. Comber, and A. Gavin, Cancer in Ireland 1994–2004: A Summary Report, NICR/NCRI, Cork, Ireland.
[4]
Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, Northern Ireland Census 2001: Key Statistics, http://www.nisra.gov.uk/Census/2001Census.html.
[5]
Central Statistics Office, Census 2002, 1996 Results and Earlier Censuses, http://www.cso.ie/en/census/census20021996resultsandearliercensuses.
[6]
J. Ferlay, C. Burkhard, S. Whelan, and D. M. Parkin, Check and Conversion Programs for Cancer Registries (IARC/IACR Tools For Cancer Registries), IARC, Lyon, France, 2005.
[7]
World Health Organisation, ICD10 International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.
[8]
Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, Central postcode directory, http://www.nisra.gov.uk/geography/postcode.htm.
[9]
An Post, Geodirectory, http://www.geodirectory.ie.
[10]
Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, Mid-year population estimates, http://www.nisra.gov.uk/demography/default.asp17.htm.
[11]
Central Statistics Office, 2006 Census Reports, Volume 2: Ages and Marital Status, http://www.cso.ie/en/census/census2006reports.
[12]
Central Statistics Office, Population and migration estimates, http://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/population.
[13]
International Labour Organization, Decent Work Indicators—Concepts and definitions, http://www.ilo.org/global/publications/lang–en/index.htm.
[14]
N. E. Breslow, “Extra-poisson variation in log-linear models,” Applied Statistics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 1984.
[15]
International Agency for Research on Cancer, Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, http://ci5.iarc.fr.
[16]
D. W. Donnelly and A. Gavin, “Socio-economic inequalities in cancer incidence: the choice of deprivation measure matters,” Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. e55–e61, 2011.
[17]
L. X. Clegg, M. E. Reichman, B. A. Miller et al., “Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study,” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 417–435, 2009.
[18]
L. Shack, C. Jordan, C. S. Thomson, V. Mak, and H. M?ller, “Variation in incidence of breast, lung and cervical cancer and malignant melanoma of skin by socioeconomic group in England,” BMC Cancer, vol. 8, article 271, 2008.
[19]
National Cancer Intelligence Network, Cancer Incidence by Deprivation, England, 1995–2004, National Cancer Intelligence Network Coordinating Centre, London, UK, 2008.
[20]
B. Secretan, K. Straif, R. Baan et al., “A review of human carcinogens—part E: tobacco, areca nut, alcohol, coal smoke, and salted fish,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1033–1034, 2009.
[21]
M. Ward, H. McGee, K. Morgan, et al., SLáN, 2007: Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition in Ireland. “One Island—One Lifestyle?” Health and Lifestyles in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: Comparing the Population Surveys SLáN, 2007 and NIHSWS, 2005, The Stationery Office, Dublin, Ireland, 2009.
[22]
IARC, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, vol. 44 of Alcohol Drinking, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 1988.
[23]
Committee on Medical Aspects of Food and Nutrition Policy, Nutritional Aspects of the Development of Cancer, Department of Health, London, UK, 1998.
[24]
Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, NI Health and Social Well Being Survey, http://www.csu.nisra.gov.uk/survey.asp46.htm.
[25]
F. X. Bosch, A. Lorincz, N. Mu?oz, C. J. L. M. Meijer, and K. V. Shah, “The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 244–265, 2002.
[26]
M. C. O'Leary, K. Sinka, C. Robertson et al., “HPV type-specific prevalence using a urine assay in unvaccinated male and female 11- to 18-year olds in Scotland,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 1221–1226, 2011.
[27]
S. Gandini, F. Sera, M. S. Cattaruzza et al., “Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2005.
[28]
C. A. Clarke, L. M. Moy, S. M. Swetter, J. Zadnick, and M. G. Cockburn, “Interaction of area-level socioeconomic status and UV radiation on melanoma occurrence in California,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2727–2733, 2010.
[29]
Met Eireann, Sunshine and Solar Radiation, http://www.met.ie/climate-ireland/sunshine.asp.