全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Decision Making Processes and Outcomes

DOI: 10.1155/2013/367208

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The primary aim of this study was to examine the contributions of individual characteristics and strategic processing to the prediction of decision quality. Data were provided by 176 adults, ages 18 to 93 years, who completed computerized decision-making vignettes and a battery of demographic and cognitive measures. We examined the relations among age, domain-specific experience, working memory, and three measures of strategic information search to the prediction of solution quality using a 4-step hierarchical linear regression analysis. Working memory and two measures of strategic processing uniquely contributed to the variance explained. Results are discussed in terms of potential advances to both theory and intervention efforts. 1. Introduction 1.1. Decision Making Processes and Outcomes A significant body of research has examined problem solving and decision making performance in adulthood (see [1, 2] for reviews). Both problem solving and decision making are concerned with the ways in which people interpret problems, form goals, search information, and combine information to arrive at solutions. Researchers often employ think-aloud and other process-tracing techniques to investigate the processes governing information search and cessation [3, 4]. The extant literature demonstrates that relative to younger and middle-aged adults, older adults approach decision making with different goals, apply different heuristics, seek different amounts and types of information in the predecision phase, and offer different decisions (e.g., [4–6]). Research has examined several possible mechanisms to explain this age difference, including the role of cognitive resources (e.g., [5, 7]), the social context and personal experience [8, 9], affective context [10], and the decision domain [11]. Sophisticated studies have examined these factors individually and in combination [12]. For many decision tasks, basic and intermediate cognitive skills such as working memory and speed of processing often are the strongest predictor of decision outcome [13]. Process-tracing techniques may allow a more thorough examination of task performance and strategic processing [3, 4, 14, 15]. In the standard decision making task, materials are structured to reflect those available in the real-world, similar to the ecologically-rich social vignettes used in the everyday problem solving approach. Although in actual real-world information searches, people are able to view all of the available information simultaneously, an advantage to the process-tracing technique is that one is able to

References

[1]  E. Peters and W. Bruine de Bruin, “Aging and decision skills,” in Judgment and Decision Making as a Skill: Learning, Development, and Evolution, M. K. Dhami, A. Schlottmann, and M. Waldmann, Eds., chapter 5, pp. 113–1139, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[2]  W. J. L. Thornton and H. A. Dumke, “Age differences in everyday problem-solving and decision-making effectiveness: a meta-analytic review,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 85–99, 2005.
[3]  J. Aschemann-Witzel and U. Hamm, “Measuring consumers' information acquisition and decision behavior with the computer-based information-display-matrix,” Methodology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2011.
[4]  M. M. S. Johnson, “Age differences in decision making: a process methodology for examining strategic information processing,” Journals of Gerontology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. P75–P78, 1990.
[5]  H. Szrek and M. K. Bundorf, “Age and the purchase of prescription drug insurance by older adults,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 308–320, 2011.
[6]  R. Mata and L. Nunes, “When less is enough: cognitive aging, information search, and decision quality in consumer choice,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 289–298, 2010.
[7]  J. C. Allaire and M. Marsiske, “Everyday cognition: age and intellectual ability correlates,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 627–644, 1999.
[8]  W. Bruine de Bruin, A. M. Parker, and B. Fishhoff, “Explaining adult age differences in decision-making competence,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 352–360, 2010.
[9]  J. H. Patrick and J. Strough, “Everyday problem solving: experience, strategies, and behavioral intentions,” Journal of Adult Development, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2004.
[10]  E. Peters, T. M. Hess, D. V?stfj?ll, and C. Auman, “Adult age difference in dual information processes: implications for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults’ decision-making competence,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2007.
[11]  W. J. L. Thornton, T. S. E. Paterson, and S. E. Yeung, “Age differences in everyday problem solving: the role of problem context,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, vol. 37, pp. 13–20, 2013.
[12]  M. L. Finucane, C. K. Mertz, P. Slovic, and E. S. Schemdit, “Task complexity and older adults decision-making competence,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 71–84, 2005.
[13]  M. L. Finucane and C. M. Gullion, “Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 271–288, 2010.
[14]  T. L. Queen, T. M. Hess, G. E. Ennis, K. Dowd, and D. Gruhn, “Information search and decision making: effects of age and complexity on strategy use,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 27, pp. 817–824, 2012.
[15]  M. K. Dhami and C. Harries, “Information search in heuristic decision making,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 571–586, 2010.
[16]  R. P. Bagozzi and U. Dholakia, “Goal setting and goal striving in consumer behavior,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 63, pp. 19–32, 1999.
[17]  S. L. Willis, M. M. Dolan, and R. M. Bertrand, “Problem solving on health-related tasks of daily living,” in Processing of Medical Information in Aging Patients: Cognitive and Human Factors Perspectives, D. C. Park, R. W. Morrell, and K. Shifren, Eds., Erlbaum, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1999.
[18]  R. W. Olshavsky, “Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: a replication and extension,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 300–316, 1979.
[19]  J. F. Yates and A. L. Patalano, “Decision making and aging,” in Processing of Medical Information in Aging Patients: Cognitive and Human Factors Perspectives, D. C. Park, R. W. Morrell, and K. Shifren, Eds., Erlbaum, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1999.
[20]  D. Wechsler, WAIS-R Manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Psychological Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 1981.
[21]  J. W. Payne, “Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 366–387, 1976.
[22]  J. C. Allaire and M. Marsiske, “Well- and ill-defined measures of everyday cognition: relationship to older adults' intellectual ability and functional status,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 101–115, 2002.
[23]  P. B. Baltes and U. M. Staudinger, “Wisdom: a metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence,” American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 122–136, 2000.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133