全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Study of Thorium Fuel Cycles for Light Water Reactor VBER-150

DOI: 10.1155/2013/491898

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The main objective of this paper is to examine the use of thorium-based fuel cycle for the transportable reactors or transportable nuclear power plants (TNPP) VBER-150 concept, in particular the neutronic behavior. The thorium-based fuel cycles included Th232+Pu239, Th232+U233, and Th232+U and the standard design fuel UOX. Parameters related to the neutronic behavior such as burnup, nuclear fuel breeding, MA stockpile, and Pu isotopes production (among others) were used to compare the fuel cycles. The Pu transmutation rate and accumulation of Pu with MA in the spent fuel were compared mutually and with an UOX open cycle. The Th232+U233 fuel cycle proved to be the best cycle for minimizing the production of Pu and MA. The neutronic calculations have been performed with the well-known MCNPX computational code, which was verified for this type of fuel performing calculation of the IAEA benchmark announced by IAEA-TECDOC-1349. 1. Introduction There is a growing interest in small reactors, and specifically TNPP. These reactors could represent a solution for developing countries with energy needs on islands, with remotely located areas without interconnected electricity grids or without the infrastructure required for land-based stationary NPP. Various designs have been developed, but most of the TNPP are based on long-term experience acquired with ship propulsion reactors and with larger land-based stationary reactors. Depending on the host state requirements, the plant can be operated by the supplier state or by an entity from the receiving country. The host state can acquire a TNPP to own with all the consequences associated with the use of nuclear energy. In other scenario, the supplier state has additional responsibilities that may include delivery and return of the TNPP and its operation if requested by the host state. All operations with the nuclear fuel are done at the zone of responsibility of the supplier state. Anyway, to implement this, it is necessary to design a reactor core with long operation cycles without on-site reloading and shuffling of fuel, which ensures difficult access to the fuel during the entire period of the reactor installation operation including transportation. Some TNPP being considered today for export, but they are innovative concepts and need effort for the demonstration of their viability [1]. The use of thorium based fuel cycle and the exclusion of on-site refueling provides the solution to the nonproliferation problem; therefore, this category of reactors is very attractive for energy supplies in developing countries.

References

[1]  International Atomic Energy Agency, Legal and Institutional Issues of Transportable Nuclear Power Plants: A Preliminary Study, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, IAEA, 2013.
[2]  International Atomic Energy Agency, Monitoring and Surveillance of Residues from the Mining and Milling of Uranium and Thorium, Safety Reports Series, IAEA, 2002.
[3]  International Atomic Energy Agency, Role of Thorium to Supplement Fuel Cycles of Future Nuclear Energy Systems, IAEA, 2012.
[4]  International Atomic Energy Agency, Thorium Fuel Cycle—Potential Benefits and Challenges, IAEA, 2005.
[5]  International Atomic Energy Agency, Thorium Fuel Utilization: Options and Trends, IAEA, 2002.
[6]  C. R. G. Hernández, A. M. Oliva, L. G. Fajardo, J. A. R. García, and J. P. Curbelo, “Uranium-thorium fuel cycle in a very high temperature hybrid system,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering, Brasília, Brazil, 2011.
[7]  The MCNPX Team, MCNPX User’s Manual 2.5.0, LA-CP-05-0369, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2005.
[8]  International Atomic Energy Agency, Potential of Thorium Based Fuel Cycles to Constrain Plutonium and Reduce Long Lived Waste Toxicity, IAEA, 2003.
[9]  J. Breza, P. Da?ílek, and V. Ne?as, “Study of thorium advanced fuel cycle utilization in light water reactor VVER-440,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 685–690, 2010.
[10]  International Atomic Energy Agency, Status of Innovative Small and Medium Sized Reactor Designs, IAEA, 2006.
[11]  “Safety assurance of NPP with VVER,” Recommendations of the 8th International Scientific and Technical Conference, Podolsk, Russia, May 2013, http://www.gidropress.podolsk.ru/files/mntk2013/mntk2013-final.pdf.
[12]  L. N. Andreeva-Andrievskaya and V. P. Kuznetsov, “Transportable nuclear power facilities in the INPRO International Project,” Atomic Energy, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 1–4, 2012.
[13]  International Atomic Energy Agency, Status of Small Reactor Designs without On-Site Refueling, IAEA, 2007.
[14]  C. García, J. Rosales, L. García et al., “Evaluation of uranium thorium and plutonium thorium fuel cycles in a very high temperature hybrid system,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 66, pp. 61–72, 2013.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133