全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Bacillus Strains Most Closely Related to Bacillus nealsonii Are Not Effectively Circumscribed within the Taxonomic Species Definition

DOI: 10.1155/2011/673136

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Bacillus strains with >99.7% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity were characterized with DNA:DNA hybridization, cellular fatty acid (CFA) analysis, and testing of 100 phenotypic traits. When paired with the most closely related type strain, percent DNA:DNA similarities (% ) for six Bacillus strains were all far below the recommended 70% threshold value for species circumscription with Bacillus nealsonii. An apparent genomic group of four Bacillus strain pairings with 94%–70% was contradicted by the failure of the strains to cluster in CFA- and phenotype-based dendrograms as well as by their differentiation with 9–13 species level discriminators such as nitrate reduction, temperature range, and acid production from carbohydrates. The novel Bacillus strains were monophyletic and very closely related based on 16S rRNA gene sequence. Coherent genomic groups were not however supported by similarly organized phenotypic clusters. Therefore, the strains were not effectively circumscribed within the taxonomic species definition. 1. Introduction CBD 118 was one of the two first Bacillus strains not related to the B. cereus group reported to harbor the capsule genes carried on pXO2 by Bacillus anthracis (USF Center for Biological Defense (CBD)) [1, 2]. Luna et al. isolated and sequenced the capsule operon (capA, capB, capC, capD, and promoter), repA, capR, acpA, IS1627, ORF43, ORF48, and ORF61 on a large plasmid in CBD 118 [1]. Its status as a carrier of B. anthracis capsule genes spurred research into determining its closest relatives, to aid in circumscribing the reservoir of genes essential for virulence in B. anthracis. When near full length 16S rRNA gene sequences were compared, the most similar type strains to strain CBD 118 were Bacillus circulans ATCC (98.9%) and Bacillus nealsonii DSM (99.3%). Strain CBD 118 differed from B. circulans ATCC and B. nealsonii DSM for 10 and 12 of 100 phenotypic traits evaluated, respectively. The percentages of DNA:DNA binding in two pairings each of strain CBD 118 to B. circulans ATCC and B. nealsonii DSM were 12.5 and 10.2% and 10.8 and 8.3%, respectively. Thus, strain CBD 118 is differentiated by phenotypic and genome-based methods from the only validly named species with greater than 98.7% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity [3–5]. Strain CBD 118 was the sole exemplar of a novel species. Prior to the proposal of novel species, studies of ten or more strains are recommended in order to detail intraspecies diversity and to foster appropriate type strain assignment [6–8]. To identify the requisite closely related strains, the

References

[1]  V. A. Luna, D. S. King, K. K. Peak et al., “Bacillus anthracis virulent plasmid pX02 genes found in large plasmids of two other Bacillus species,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 2367–2377, 2006.
[2]  K. K. Peak, K. E. Duncan, W. Veguilla et al., “Bacillus acidiceler sp. nov., isolated from a forensic specimen, containing Bacillus anthracis pX02 genes,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2031–2036, 2007.
[3]  E. Stackebrandt, W. Frederiksen, G. M. Garrity et al., “Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1043–1047, 2002.
[4]  E. Stackebrandt and B. M. Goebel, “Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 846–849, 1994.
[5]  L. G. Wayne, D. J. Brenner, R. R. Colwell, et al., “Report of the ad hoc committee on the recommendation of approaches to bacterial systematics,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 463–464, 1987.
[6]  N. A. Logan, O. Berge, A. H. Bishop et al., “Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of aerobic, endospore-forming bacteria,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 2114–2121, 2009.
[7]  R. Rosselló-Móra and R. Amann, “The species concept for prokaryotes,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 39–67, 2001.
[8]  B. J. Tindall, R. Rosselló-Móra, B.-J. Huse, W. Ludwig, and P. K?mpfer, “Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 249–266, 2010.
[9]  K. Goto, T. Omura, Y. Hara, and Y. Sadaie, “Application of the partial 16S rDNA sequence as an index for rapid identification of species in the genus Bacillus,” Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2000.
[10]  M. Buckley and R. J. Roberts, Reconciling Microbial Systematics & Genomics, a Report Based on a Colloquium, Sponsored by the American Academy of Microbiology, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[11]  R. Rossello-Mora and P. K?mpfer, “Defining microbial diversity—the species concept for prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms,” in Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting, A. T. Bull, Ed., pp. 29–39, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
[12]  C. A. Istock, J. A. Bell, N. Ferguson, and N. L. Istock, “Bacterial species and evolution: theoretical and practical perspectives,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 17, no. 3-4, pp. 137–150, 1996.
[13]  K. T. Konstantinidis and J. M. Tiedje, “Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 2567–2572, 2005.
[14]  K. T. Konstantinidis, A. Ramette, and J. M. Tiedje, “The bacterial species definition in the genomic era,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 361, no. 1475, pp. 1929–1940, 2006.
[15]  J. Maynard Smith, N. H. Smith, M. O'Rourke, and B. G. Spratt, “How clonal are bacteria?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 4384–4388, 1993.
[16]  P. Vandamme, B. Pot, M. Gillis, P. De Vos, K. Kersters, and J. Swings, “Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 407–438, 1996.
[17]  W. P. Hanage, C. Fraser, and B. G. Spratt, “Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 361, no. 1475, pp. 1917–1927, 2006.
[18]  F. M. Cohan, “What are bacterial species?” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 56, pp. 457–487, 2002.
[19]  E. Stackebrandt and J. Ebers, “Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards,” Microbiology Today, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 152–155, 2006.
[20]  M. C. J. Maiden, J. A. Bygraves, E. Feil et al., “Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 3140–3145, 1998.
[21]  A. R. Sprocati, C. Alisi, F. Tasso, L. Segre, and C. Cremisini, “Comparison of microbial communities native to three differently polluted ecological niches in the industrial site of Bagnoli (Naples, Italy),” in Modern Multidisciplinary Applied Microbiology, Exploiting Microbes and Their Interactions, A. Meddez-Vilas, Ed., pp. 488–493, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2006.
[22]  E. Gauger, R. Smolowitz, K. Uhlinger, J. Casey, and M. Gómez-Chiarri, “Vibrio harveyi and other bacterial pathogens in cultured summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus,” Aquaculture, vol. 260, no. 1–4, pp. 10–20, 2006.
[23]  I. Lafortune, P. Juteau, E. Déziel, F. Lépine, R. Beaudet, and R. Villemur, “Bacterial diversity of a consortium degrading high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a two-liquid phase biosystem,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 455–468, 2009.
[24]  M. Halpern, D. Raats, and S. Lev-Yadun, “Plant biological warfare: thorns inject pathogenic bacteria into herbivores,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 584–592, 2007.
[25]  S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Sch?ffer et al., “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3389–3402, 1997.
[26]  Z. Zhang, S. Schwartz, L. Wagner, and W. Miller, “A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences,” Journal of Computational Biology, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 203–214, 2000.
[27]  D. A. Benson, M. S. Boguski, D. J. Lipman et al., “GenBank,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 1999.
[28]  J. Chun, J. H. Lee, Y. Jung et al., “EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 2259–2261, 2007.
[29]  J. R. Cole, Q. Wang, E. Cardenas et al., “The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. D141–D145, 2009.
[30]  S. Chakravorty, D. Helb, M. Burday, N. Connell, and D. Alland, “A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 330–339, 2007.
[31]  J. Felsenstein, “PHYLIP, phylogeny inference package, version 3.68,” 2008, http://evolution.gs.washington.edu/phylip.html.
[32]  J. De Ley, H. Cattoir, and A. Reynaerts, “The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 133–142, 1970.
[33]  V. A. R. Huss, H. Festl, and K. H. Schleifer, “Studies on the spectrophotometric determination of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates,” Systematic and Applied Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 184–192, 1983.
[34]  N. Logan and P. De Vos, “Genus I. Bacillus Cohn 1872, ,” in The Firmicutes, Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 3, pp. 21–128, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[35]  R. M. Atlas, “Tween-80 Hydrolysis Medium,” in Handbook of Microbiological Media, L. C. Parks, Ed., p. 957, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1993.
[36]  J. Keswani and W. B. Whitman, “Relationship of 16S rRNA sequence similarity to DNA hybridization in prokaryotes,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 667–678, 2001.
[37]  R. Rosselló-Móra, “DNA-DNA reassociation methods applied to microbial taxonomy and their critical evaluation,” in Molecular Identification, Systematics, and Population Structure of Prokaryotes, E. Stackebrandt, Ed., pp. 23–50, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
[38]  J. B. Ursing, R. A. Rosselló-Móra, E. Garcia-Valdes, and J. Lalucat, “Taxonomic note: a pragmatic approach to the nomenclature of phenotypically similar genomic groups,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 45, no. 3, p. 604, 1995.
[39]  J. Goris, K. T. Konstantinidis, J. A. Klappenbach, T. Coenye, P. Vandamme, and J. M. Tiedje, “DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 81–91, 2007.
[40]  L. Dijkshoorn and A. Nemec, “The diversity of the genus acinetobacter,” in Acinetobacter, Molecular Biology, pp. 1–34, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK, 2008.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133