全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Functioning of South Moravian Floodplain Forests (Czech Republic) in Forest Environment Subject to Natural and Anthropogenic Change

DOI: 10.1155/2013/248749

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

South Moravian floodplain forests at the confluence of the Morava and Dyje Rivers, which are related to the floodplain forests of Austria and Slovakia to a considerable degree, have been strongly affected by changes in forest environment caused by natural and anthropogenic impacts. The dominant change factors encompassed changes in the 12–14th centuries resulting in the formation of a flooded alluvium and a significant transition of hardwood floodplain to softwood floodplain. Their further development was affected particularly by forestry activities, and they saw a gradual transformation into hardwood floodplain forests with dominant species of oak, ash, hornbeam, and others. The primary impact in the 20th century was stream regulation and the construction of three water reservoirs, which resulted predominantly in changes in the groundwater table. Response to these changes was registered particularly in the herb layer. The contemporary forest management adjusts to environmental changes and makes efforts to alleviate the negative impacts of previously implemented changes through restoration projects. 1. Introduction The Czech Republic houses approximately 33,000?ha floodplain forests concentrated in four main sites (Figure 1) [1].(1)South Moravia (Morava and Dyje Rivers)—15,800?ha,(2)Litovelské Pomoraví—10,400?ha,(3)the Odra River alluvium—600?ha,(4)the Labe River alluvium—6,300?ha. Figure 1: Distribution of floodplain forests in the Czech Republic [ 1]. Over the course of time, South Moravian floodplain forests, situated in the alluvium of the lower reach of the Morava River and primarily at the confluence of the Morava and Dyje, have been subject to a complex evolution related to changes in landscape development and human impact (site no 1 in Figure 1.) The prevailing vegetation type is “Fraxino pannonical ulmetum” [2]. According to [3], several cold and dry glacial periods have alternated with warm and humid interglacial periods in the Quaternary over the past two million years. This is characterized by alternating gully erosion and accumulation stages and a gradual formation of today’s landscape morphology. During these periods the landscape was gradually covered with vegetation, as the buried humus horizons attest to this. River gravels deposited in the conditions of the so-called rampaging river, under which the riverbed frequently changed its course within the entire floodplain. Later, river sands and sandy gravels were deposited in the streams of meandering rivers. These processes conditioned the resulting heterogeneity of alluvial cover. The

References

[1]  E. Klimo, H. Hager, S. Mati?, I. Ani?, and J. Kulhavy, Floodplain Forests of the Temperate Zone of Europe, Lesnická Práce, Kostelec nad ?ernymi lesy, 2008.
[2]  Z. Neuhauslova, Map of Potential Vegetation of the Czech Republic, Academia Praha, 1998.
[3]  P. Havlí?ek, “Geology of the dyje and morava confluence,” in Floodplain Forests of the Morava and Dyje Floodplain, H. Kordiovsky, Ed., pp. 12–19, Moraviapress B?eclav, 2011.
[4]  L. Polá?ek, “The prehistory and history of the river valley landscape,” in Morava River Floodplain Meadows—Importance, Restoration and Management, J. ?effer and V. Stanová, Eds., pp. 25–36, DAPHNE, Bratislava, Slovakia, 1999.
[5]  H. Kilianová, Assessment of changes in forest geobiocenoses in the Morava River floodplain during the 19th and 20th centuries [Ph.D. dissertation], Olomouc, Czech Republic, 2001.
[6]  P. Hada?, “Temperature and humidity conditions of the floodplain forest with respect to stand microclimate and mesoclimate,” Ekológia, vol. 22, supplement 3, pp. 19–46, 2003.
[7]  P. Prax, “The hydrophysiological properties of the soil and changes in them,” in Floodplain Forest Ecosystem II. After Water Management Meausures, M. Penka, M. Vyskot, E. Klimo, and F. Va?í?ek, Eds., pp. 145–168, Amsterdam coed. Academia, Prague, Czech Republic, 1991.
[8]  M. Mo?ny, “Potential evapotranspiration as an important agro-climatic characteristic,” Meteorologické Zprávy, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 152–156, 1993 (Czech).
[9]  W. Mottl, “Absch?tzung der potentiellen Evapotranspiration aus Klimadaten und Vergleich verschiedener Berechnungsmethoden,” ?sterreichische Wasserwirtschaft, vol. 35, no. 9/10, pp. 247–254, 1983.
[10]  B. Vin?, et al., “Impacts of a possible climatic change on forests in the Czech Republic—Territorial study of climate change” (Czech), National Climatic Programme of Czech Republic. Element, 19, 2, ?HMú Praha, pages 135, 1996.
[11]  J. Kalvová, E. Holtanová, M. Motl, J. Mik?ovsky, P. Pi?oft, and A. Raidl, “Odhad rozsahu změn klimatu ?eské republiky pro t?i ?asová období 21. Století na základě vystup? AR4 model? (Estimated Scope of Climate Change in the Czech Republic for Three Time Periods in the 21st Century Based on AR4 Model Outputs),” Meteorologické Zprávy, vol. 2, no. 63, pp. 57–66, 2010.
[12]  E. Klimo, V. Hybler, H. Lorencová, and J. ?tykar, “The heterogeneity of soil properties and biodiversity in floodplain forests of southern moravia in natural conditions and under antropogenic impacts,” Ekologia Bratislava, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 296–314, 2011.
[13]  P. Prax, A. Prax, M. Kloupar, J. Hete?a, and I. Sukop, “Optimization of the floodplain ecosystem hydrological regime following anthropogenic interference and its inclusion in the tvrdonice forest district management plan,” Grantová slu?ba L?R, Teplice. Závěre?ná zpráva, pages 27, 2005.
[14]  M. Penka, M. Vyskot, E. Klimo, and F. Va?í?ek, Floodplain Forets Ecosystem II. After Water Management Meausures, Elsevier, Prague, Czech Republic, 1991.
[15]  F. Va?í?ek, “Changes in the structure and biomass of the herb layer under the condition of a medium moisture gradient,” in Floodplain Forest Ecosystem II. After Water Management Meausures, M. Penka, M. Vyskot, E. Klimo, and F. Va?í?ek, Eds., pp. 197–242, Amsterdam coed. Academia, Prague, Czech Republic, 1991.
[16]  J. No?i?ka, An Outline of the Evolution of our Forests, Praha, Czech Republic, 1957.
[17]  J. Vybíral, “Role of foresters in the floodplain landscape,” in Floodplain Forests of the Morava and Dyje Floodplain, H. Kordiovsky, Ed., pp. 163–172, Moraviapress, B?eclav, Czech Republic, 2004.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133