全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Comparison of the Strength of Binary Dislocation Junctions in fcc Crystals

DOI: 10.1155/2014/715356

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Discrete dislocation dynamics were used to determine the relative strengths of binary dislocation junctions in fcc crystals. Equilibrium junctions of different types Lomer, glissile, coplanar, and collinear were formed by allowing parallel dislocations of unequal length to react. The strengths were determined from the computed minimum strain rate versus the applied shear stress plots. The collinear configuration was found to be the strongest and coplanar the weakest. It was seen that the glissile junction could exist as two variants depending on which parent slip system the shear stress is applied. One variant of the glissile junction was found to be as strong as the collinear configuration. 1. Introduction Under externally applied stress metals plastically deform and work-harden through the movement, interaction, and multiplication of dislocations. The interactions of dislocations in fcc metals on the slip systems result in formation of Lomer, Hirth, collinear, glissile, and coplanar junctions [1]. Lomer and Hirth junctions are sessile, the glissile and coplanar junctions are glissile, and collinear is an interaction between dislocations with parallel Burgers vectors leading to annihilation. The formation of these junctions, their subsequent interaction with dislocations and their destruction is known to control the work-hardening behaviour of materials [2]. The modelling of the mechanical behaviour of materials at different length scales requires an understanding of the movement and interactions of dislocations. In the last decade dislocations have been modelled as lines of singularity in an elastic continuum and their dynamics solved using a discrete dislocation dynamics (DDD) framework formulation [3–10] as individual dislocation interactions [11–14], as dislocation-forest interactions [2, 15, 16] and as dislocation-boundary interactions [17, 18]. Of the individual dislocation interactions the Lomer junction has been studied the most [11, 12, 15, 19, 20] as its formation and destruction is thought to be the primary cause for strain hardening in fcc metals. In most studies on fcc crystals the junction strength is correlated with the length of junctions, that is, a higher junction length signifies higher strength [1, 20, 21]. Analytical calculations made using line tension model [11] showed that the junction strength was the highest for Lomer, followed by glissile junction and the least for the Hirth junction; the collinear interaction and coplanar junction were not considered in that study. However, in later studies [1, 15] the collinear interaction

References

[1]  R. Madec, B. Devincre, L. Kubin, T. Hoc, and D. Rodney, “The role of collinear interaction in dislocation-induced hardening,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5641, pp. 1879–1882, 2003.
[2]  R. Madec, B. Devincre, and L. P. Kubin, “From dislocation junctions to forest hardening,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, no. 25, Article ID 255508, 4 pages, 2002.
[3]  A. Arsenlis, W. Cai, M. Tang et al., “Enabling strain hardening simulations with dislocation dynamics,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 553, 2007.
[4]  N. M. Ghoniem, S.-H. Tong, and L. Z. Sun, “Parametric dislocation dynamics: a thermodynamics-based approach to investigations of mesoscopic plastic deformation,” Physical Review B, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 913–927, 2000.
[5]  L. P. Kubin, G. Canova, M. Condat, B. Devincre, V. Pontikis, and Y. Bréchet, “Dislocation microstructures and plastic flow: a 3D simulation,” Solid State Phenomena, vol. 23, pp. 455–472, 1992.
[6]  K. W. Schwarz, “Simulation of dislocations on the mesoscopic scale. I. Methods and examples,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 108–119, 1999.
[7]  D. Weygand, L. H. Friedman, E. Van Der Giessen, and A. Needleman, “Aspects of boundary-value problem solutions with three-dimensional dislocation dynamics,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 437–468, 2002.
[8]  H. M. Zbib, M. Rhee, and J. P. Hirth, “On plastic deformation and the dynamics of 3D dislocations,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 40, no. 2-3, pp. 113–127, 1998.
[9]  M. Verdier, M. Fivel, and I. Groma, “Mesoscopic scale simulation of dislocation dynamics in fcc metals: principles and applications,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 755–770, 1998.
[10]  E. Martínez, J. Marian, A. Arsenlis, M. Victoria, and J. M. Perlado, “Atomistically informed dislocation dynamics in fcc crystals,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 869–895, 2008.
[11]  L. Dupuy and M. C. Fivel, “A study of dislocation junctions in FCC metals by an orientation dependent line tension model,” Acta Materialia, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 4873–4885, 2002.
[12]  C. S. Shin, M. C. Fivel, D. Rodney, R. Phillips, V. B. Shenoy, and L. Dupuy, “Formation and strength of dislocation junctions in FCC metals: a study by dislocation dynamics and atomistic simulations,” Journal de Physique IV, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. Pr519–Pr526, 2001.
[13]  R. C. Picu and M. A. Soare, “Asymmetric dislocation junctions exhibit a broad range of strengths,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 508–511, 2010.
[14]  R. Madec and L. P. Kubin, “Second-order junctions and strain hardening in bcc and fcc crystals,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 767–770, 2008.
[15]  B. Devincre, L. Kubin, and T. Hoc, “Physical analyses of crystal plasticity by DD simulations,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 741–746, 2006.
[16]  A. Alankar, I. N. Mastorakos, D. P. Field, and H. M. Zbib, “Determination of dislocation interaction strengths using discrete dislocation dynamics of curved dislocations,” Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 134, no. 2, Article ID 021018, 2012.
[17]  B. Liu, D. Raabe, P. Eisenlohr, F. Roters, A. Arsenlis, and G. Hommes, “Dislocation interactions and low-angle grain boundary strengthening,” Acta Materialia, vol. 59, no. 19, pp. 7125–7134, 2011.
[18]  B. Liu, P. Eisenlohr, F. Roters, and D. Raabe, “Simulation of dislocation penetration through a general low-angle grain boundary,” Acta Materialia, vol. 60, no. 13-14, pp. 5380–5390, 2012.
[19]  D. Rodney and R. Phillips, “Structure and strength of dislocation junctions: an atomic level analysis,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 1704–1707, 1999.
[20]  V. B. Shenoy, R. V. Kukta, and R. Phillips, “Mesoscopic analysis of structure and strength of dislocation junctions in fcc metals,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 1491–1494, 2000.
[21]  V. Bulatov and W. Cai, Computer Simulations of Dislocations, OUP Oxford, 2006.
[22]  L. K. Wickham, K. W. Schwarz, and J. S. St?lken, “Rules for forest interactions between dislocations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 83, no. 22, pp. 4574–4577, 1999.
[23]  L. P. Kubin, R. Madec, and B. Devincre, “Dislocation intersections and reactions in FCC and BCC crystals,” in Proceedings of the Multiscale Phenomena in Materials—Experiments and Modeling Related to Mechanical Behavior, pp. 25–36, April 2003.
[24]  T. Arsenlis, V. V. Bulatov, W. Cai, G. Hommes, M. Rhee, and M. Tang, Documentation of ParaDiS V2. 5. 1., 2011.
[25]  G. E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
[26]  C. C. Wu, P. W. Chung, S. Aubry, L. B. Munday, and A. Arsenlis, “The strength of binary junctions in hexagonal close-packed crystals,” Acta Materialia, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 3422–3431, 2013.
[27]  G. Saada, “Sur le durcissement d? à la recombinaison des dislocations,” Acta Metallurgica, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 841–847, 1960.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133