全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Dataset of Experimental HLA-B*2705 Peptide Binding Affinities

DOI: 10.1155/2014/914684

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

T-cell epitopes form the basis of many vaccines, diagnostics, and reagents. Current methods for the in silico identification of T-cell epitopes rely, in the main, on the accurate quantitative prediction of peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex (pMHC) affinity using data-driven computational approaches. Here, we describe a dataset of experimentally determined pMHC binding affinities for the problematic human class I allele HLA-B*2705. Using an in-house, FACS-based, MHC stabilization assay, we measured binding of 223 peptides. This dataset includes both nonbinding and binding peptides, with measured affinities (expressed as of the half-maximal binding level) ranging from 1.2 to 7.4. This dataset should provide a useful independent benchmark for new and existing methods for predicting peptide binding to HLA-B*2705. 1. Introduction Products of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) play a fundamental role in regulating immune responses. T cells recognise antigen as peptide fragments bound by MHC molecules, a process requiring initial antigen degradation through complex proteolytic digestion prior to formation of a binary complex. The biological role of MHC proteins is thus to bind peptides and “present” these at the cell surface for inspection by T-cell antigen receptors (TCRs) [1]. Class I molecules are composed of a heavy chain in complex with β2-microglobulin. The MHC-peptide-binding site consists of a β-sheet, forming the base, flanked by two α-helices, which together form a narrow cleft or groove accommodating bound peptides. The principal difference between class I and class II MHCs is the structure of the peptide binding groove: this is constrained to bind 8–11 amino acid peptides in class I, although it has become clear recently that much longer peptides can also bind to class I MHCs [2]. Predictive models of peptide-MHC binding affinity have become important components of modern computational immunovaccinology [3]. Previously, such approaches have been built around relatively uncomplicated classification methods but have now largely given way to quantitative regression-based approaches [4]. Immunoinformatics, a newly emergent subdiscipline of bioinformatics, which addresses informatic problems within immunology, uses QSAR technology to tackle the crucial issue of epitope prediction [5]. As high-throughput biology reveals the genomic sequences of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites, such prediction will become increasingly important in the postgenomic discovery of novel vaccines, reagents, and diagnostics. In order to better

References

[1]  D. R. Flower, “Towards in silico prediction of immunogenic epitopes,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 667–674, 2003.
[2]  I. K. Macdonald, M. Harkiolaki, L. Hunt et al., “MHC class I bound to an immunodominant Theileria parva epitope demonstrates unconventional presentation to T cell receptors,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 6, no. 10, Article ID e1001149, 2010.
[3]  B. Korber, M. LaBute, and K. Yusim, “Immunoinformatics comes of age,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 2, no. 6, Article ID e71, 2006.
[4]  I. A. Doytchinova and D. R. Flower, “Quantitative approaches to computational vaccinology,” Immunology and Cell Biology, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 270–279, 2002.
[5]  D. R. Flower, “Databases and data mining for computational vaccinology,” Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 396–400, 2003.
[6]  S. Vivona, J. L. Gardy, S. Ramachandran et al., “Computer-aided biotechnology: from immuno-informatics to reverse vaccinology,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 190–200, 2008.
[7]  A. Chatzikyriakidou, P. V. Voulgari, and A. A. Drosos, “What is the role of HLA-B27 in spondyloarthropathies?” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 464–468, 2011.
[8]  M. Marcilla and J. A. López de Castro, “Peptides: the cornerstone of HLA-B27 biology and pathogenetic role in spondyloarthritis,” Tissue Antigens, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 495–506, 2008.
[9]  J. A. Lopez de Castro, I. Alvarez, M. Marcilla et al., “HLA-B27: a registry of constitutive peptide ligands,” Tissue Antigens, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 424–445, 2004.
[10]  J. A. López de Castro, “The HLA-B27 peptidome: building on the cornerstone,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 316–319, 2010.
[11]  J. A. López de Castro, “HLA-B27 and the pathogenesis of spondyloarthropathies,” Immunology Letters, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2007.
[12]  K. Falk, O. Rotzschke, S. Stevanovic, G. Jung, and H.-G. Rammensee, “Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules,” Nature, vol. 351, no. 6324, pp. 290–296, 1991.
[13]  J. Ruppert, J. Sidney, E. Celis, R. T. Kubo, H. M. Grey, and A. Sette, “Prominent role of secondary anchor residues in peptide binding to HLA-A2.1 molecules,” Cell, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 929–937, 1993.
[14]  I. A. Doytchinova, V. A. Walshe, N. A. Jones, S. E. Gloster, P. Borrow, and D. R. Flower, “Coupling in silico and in vitro analysis of peptide-MHC binding: a bioinformatic approach enabling prediction of superbinding peptides and anchorless epitopes,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 12, pp. 7495–7502, 2004.
[15]  I. A. Doytchinova, V. Walshe, P. Borrow, and D. R. Flower, “Towards the chemometric dissection of peptide—HLA-A*0201 binding affinity: comparison of local and global QSAR models,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 203–212, 2005.
[16]  P. Guan, I. A. Doytchinova, V. A. Walshe, P. Borrow, and D. R. Flower, “Analysis of peptide-protein binding using amino acid descriptors: prediction and experimental verification for human histocompatibility complex HLA- 0201,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 23, pp. 7418–7425, 2005.
[17]  V. A. Walshe, C. K. Hattotuwagama, I. A. Doytchinova et al., “Integrating in silico and in vitro analysis of peptide binding affinity to HLA-C 0102: a bioinformatic approach to the prediction of new epitopes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 11, Article ID e8095, 2009.
[18]  C. Lundegaard, K. Lamberth, M. Harndahl, S. Buus, O. Lund, and M. Nielsen, “NetMHC-3.0: accurate web accessible predictions of human, mouse and monkey MHC class I affinities for peptides of length 8–11,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, supplement 2, pp. W509–W512, 2008.
[19]  B. Peters and A. Sette, “Generating quantitative models describing the sequence specificity of biological processes with the stabilized matrix method,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 6, article 132, 2005.
[20]  J. Sidney, E. Assarsson, C. Moore et al., “Quantitative peptide binding motifs for 19 human and mouse MHC class I molecules derived using positional scanning combinatorial peptide libraries,” Immunome Research, vol. 4, article 2, 2008.
[21]  Y. Kim, J. Ponomarenko, Z. Zhu et al., “Immune epitope database analysis resource,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. W1, pp. W525–W530, 2012.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133