A new moderate-random-search strategy (MRPSO) is used for an optimal bidding strategy of a supplier, considering linear bidding curve model with a precise model and emission as constraints, and who delivered electricity to end users in oligopolistic dynamic electricity is studied. Bidding strategy of a supplier is solved by MRPSO, where mean best position ( ) boosts the diversity and the exploration ability of particle. The MRPSO adopts an attractor as the main moving direction of particles, which replaces the velocity update procedure in the particle swarm optimization. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is tested with linear bidding model and the results are compared with the solutions obtained using classical PSO. In this paper, a comparative study has been done by a competitive bidding model tested on IEEE 14- and IEEE 39-bus systems and results motivate the suppliers towards opting green technologies. 1. Introduction In this competitive world, the market is to be said perfect only when the seller and buyer both have competition and are participating equally in the competitive bidding process. In energy market, the generation as well as load side has competition in this competitive electricity market. Recently the electricity markets are in transition phase from single buyer and single seller pattern to multibuyer and multiseller pattern. This type of auction system makes an environment for demanding side entities to compete with their opponents through bidding process; moreover the benefits of retailers depend on their participation in the bidding process so developing the optimal bidding strategies of demanding side is of keen interest in recent researches. In this emerging electricity market, each power supplier can increase its own profit through strategic bidding. The imperfect knowledge of rival suppliers extensively affects the profit of each supplier [1]. In the day-ahead electricity market bids have been submitted to the market operator, who matches generation level of each participant for hourly aggregate supply and decides market clearing prices (MCP). The framing of best optimal bids for supplier with their own costs, technical constraints, and behavior of rival’s and market is known as strategic bidding problem. Lots of work has been done on strategic bidding in competitive electricity market. There are some approaches to frame the strategic bidding problem (SBP) on the basis of their MCP and rival’s bidding behavior [2]. A basic model of optimal bidding has been framed firstly, solved by using dynamic programming based
References
[1]
F. Wen and A. K. David, “Optimal bidding strategies and modeling of imperfect information among competitive generators,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2001.
[2]
A. K. David and F. Wen, “Strategic bidding in competitive electricity markets: a literature survey,” IEEE PES Summer Meeting, vol. 4, pp. 2168–2173, 2000.
[3]
A. K. David, “Competitive bidding in electricity supply,” IEE Proceedings C: Generation Transmission and Distribution, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 421–426, 1993.
[4]
G. Gross and D. J. Finlay, “Optimal bidding strategies in competitive electricity markets,” in Proceedings of the 12th Power System Computation Conference, pp. 815–823, August 1996.
[5]
D. Zhang, Y. Wang, and P. B. Luh, “Optimization based bidding strategies in the deregulated market,” in Proceedings of the IEEE PES Power Industry Computer Applications Conference, pp. 63–69, May 1999.
[6]
A. R. Kian, J. B. Cruz Jr., and R. J. Thomas, “Bidding strategies in oligopolistic dynamic electricity double-sided auctions,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 2005.
[7]
Y. S. Son, R. Baldick, and S. Siddiqi, “Reanalysis of nash equilibrium bidding strategies in a bilateral electricity market,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1243–1244, 2004.
[8]
A. Ugedo, E. Lobato, A. Franco, L. Rouco, J. Fernández-Caro, and J. Chofre, “Strategic bidding in sequential electricity markets,” IEE Proceedings: Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 431–442, 2006.
[9]
C. W. Richter, “Genetic algorithm evolution of utility bidding strategies for the competitive marketplace,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 256–261, 1998.
[10]
C. W. Richter Jr., “A profit-based unit commitment ga for the competitive environment,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 715–721, 2000.
[11]
F. S. Wen and A. K. David, “Strategic bidding for electricity supply in a day-ahead energy market,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 197–206, 2001.
[12]
F. S. Wen and A. K. David, “Optimally co-ordinated bidding strategies in energy and ancillary service markets,” IEE Proceedings: Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 331–339, 2002.
[13]
M. L. Wong and K. S. Leung, “An efficient data mining method for learning Bayesian networks using an evolutionary algorithm-based hybrid approach,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 378–404, 2004.
[14]
B. Venkatesh, T. Jamtsho, and H. B. Gooi, “Unit commitment—a fuzzy mixed integer Linear Programming solution,” IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 836–846, 2007.
[15]
D. N. Simopoulos, S. D. Kavatza, and C. D. Vournas, “Unit commitment by an enhanced simulated annealing algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 68–76, 2006.
[16]
T. C. Ou, K. H. Lu, W. M. Lin, and C. M. Hong, “A study for price-based unit commitment with carbon trading by DI&C simulation,” in Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, pp. 73–78, July 2010.
[17]
H. Gao and W. Xu, “A new particle swarm algorithm and its globally convergent modifications,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B: Cybernetics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1334–1351, 2011.
[18]
I. Kockar, “Unit commitment for combined pool/bilateral markets with emissions trading,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting: Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, pp. 1–9, July 2008.
[19]
T. Gjengedal, “Emission constrained unit-commitment (ECUC),” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 132–138, 1996.
[20]
Kockar, A. J. Conejo, and J. R. McDonald, “Influence of the emissions trading scheme on market clearing,” in Proceedings of the Power System Computation Conference (PSCC '08), 2008.
[21]
C. Genesi, G. P. Granelli, P. Marannino et al., “Impact of renewable energy quotas and emission trade on generation planning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Bucharest PowerTech: Innovative Ideas Toward the Electrical Grid of the Future, July 2009.
[22]
P. Bajpai, S. K. Punna, and S. N. Singh, “Swarm intelligence-based strategic bidding in competitive electricity markets,” IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 175–184, 2008.
[23]
P. Bajpai and S. N. Singh, “Fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimization for bidding strategy in uniform price spot market,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2152–2160, 2007.
[24]
K. Dwivedi, Y. Kumar, and G. Agnihotri, “Competitive bidding in electricity markets with carbon emission by using particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of the IAENG International Conference Electrical Engineering, HongKong, March 2012.