Functional neuroimaging reveals both increases (task-positive) and decreases (task-negative) in neural activation with many tasks. Many studies show a temporal relationship between task positive and task negative networks that is important for efficient cognitive functioning. Here we provide evidence for a spatial relationship between task positive and negative networks. There are strong spatial similarities between many reported task negative brain networks, termed the default mode network, which is typically assumed to be a spatially fixed network. However, this is not the case. The spatial structure of the DMN varies depending on what specific task is being performed. We test whether there is a fundamental spatial relationship between task positive and negative networks. Specifically, we hypothesize that the distance between task positive and negative voxels is consistent despite different spatial patterns of activation and deactivation evoked by different cognitive tasks. We show significantly reduced variability in the distance between within-condition task positive and task negative voxels than across-condition distances for four different sensory, motor and cognitive tasks - implying that deactivation patterns are spatially dependent on activation patterns (and vice versa), and that both are modulated by specific task demands. We also show a similar relationship between positively and negatively correlated networks from a third ‘rest’ dataset, in the absence of a specific task. We propose that this spatial relationship may be the macroscopic analogue of microscopic neuronal organization reported in sensory cortical systems, and that this organization may reflect homeostatic plasticity necessary for efficient brain function.
References
[1]
Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, et al. (2001) A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 676–682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676
[2]
Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Bellgowan PS, Rao SM, et al. (1999) Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state. A functional MRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 11: 80–95. doi: 10.1162/089892999563265
[3]
Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V (2003) Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 253–258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0135058100
[4]
Vincent JL, Patel GH, Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Baker JT, et al. (2007) Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain. Nature 447: 83–86. doi: 10.1038/nature05758
[5]
Lu H, Zou Q, Gu H, Raichle ME, Stein EA, et al. (2012) Rat brains also have a default mode network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 3979–3984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200506109
[6]
Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, et al. (2005) The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 9673–9678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102
Singh KD, Fawcett IP (2008) Transient and linearly graded deactivation of the human default-mode network by a visual detection task. Neuroimage 41: 100–112. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.051
[9]
Leech R, Kamourieh S, Beckmann CF, Sharp DJ (2011) Fractionating the default mode network: distinct contributions of the ventral and dorsal posterior cingulate cortex to cognitive control. J Neurosci 31: 3217–3224. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.5626-10.2011
[10]
Harrison BJ, Pujol J, Contreras-Rodríguez O, Soriano-Mas C, López-Solà M, et al. (2011) Task-induced deactivation from rest extends beyond the default mode brain network. PLoS One 6: e22964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022964
[11]
Seghier ML, Price CJ (2012) Functional heterogeneity within the default network during semantic processing and speech production. Frontiers in Psychology 3..
[12]
McPhail MJ, Leech R, Grover VP, Fitzpatrick JA, Dhanjal NS, et al. (2013) Modulation of neural activation following treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. Neurology 80: 1041–1047. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0b013e31828726e1
[13]
Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, Behrens TEJ, Yacoub E, et al. (2013) The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview. NeuroImage 80: 62–79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041
[14]
Glasser MF, Sotiropoulos SN, Wilson JA, Coalson TS, Fischl B, et al.. (2013) The Minimal Preprocessing Pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage.
[15]
Shmuel A, Yacoub E, Pfeuffer J, Van de Moortele P-F, Adriany G, et al. (2002) Sustained negative BOLD, blood flow and oxygen consumption response and its coupling to the positive response in the human brain. Neuron 36: 1195–1210. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01061-9
[16]
Harel N, Lee S-P, Nagaoka T, Kim D-S, Kim S-G (2002) Origin of negative blood oxygenation level–dependent fMRI signals. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 22: 908–917. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200208000-00002
[17]
Shmuel A, Augath M, Oeltermann A, Logothetis NK (2006) Negative functional MRI response correlates with decreases in neuronal activity in monkey visual area V1. Nature neuroscience 9: 569–577. doi: 10.1038/nn1675
[18]
Leech R, Braga R, Sharp DJ (2012) Echoes of the brain within the posterior cingulate cortex. J Neurosci 32: 215–222. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3689-11.2012
[19]
Smith SM, Miller KL, Moeller S, Xu J, Auerbach EJ, et al. (2012) Temporally-independent functional modes of spontaneous brain activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 3131–3136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121329109
[20]
Braga RM, Sharp DJ, Leeson C, Wise RJ, Leech R (2013) Echoes of the Brain within Default Mode, Association, and Heteromodal Cortices. The Journal of Neuroscience 33: 14031–14039. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.0570-13.2013
[21]
Cocchi L, Zalesky A, Fornito A, Mattingley JB (2013) Dynamic cooperation and competition between brain systems during cognitive control. Trends in cognitive sciences 17: 493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.006
[22]
Attwell D, Laughlin SB (2001) An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 21: 1133–1145. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001
[23]
Plenz D, Thiagarajan TC (2007) The organizing principles of neuronal avalanches: cell assemblies in the cortex? Trends Neurosci 30: 101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.01.005
[24]
Beggs JM, Plenz D (2003) Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. The Journal of neuroscience 23: 11167–11177.
Tagliazucchi E, Balenzuela P, Fraiman D, Chialvo DR (2012) Criticality in large-scale brain FMRI dynamics unveiled by a novel point process analysis. Frontiers in Physiology.
[27]
Kitzbichler MG, Smith ML, Christensen SR, Bullmore E (2009) Broadband criticality of human brain network synchronization. PLoS computational biology 5: e1000314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000314
[28]
Hellyer PJ, Shanahan M, Scott G, Wise RJ, Sharp DJ, et al. (2014) The control of global brain dynamics: opposing actions of frontoparietal control and default mode networks on attention. J Neurosci 34: 451–461. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.1853-13.2014
[29]
Expert P, Lambiotte R, Chialvo DR, Christensen K, Jensen HJ, et al. (2011) Self-similar correlation function in brain resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. J R Soc Interface 8: 472–479. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0416
[30]
Schwartz O, Simoncelli EP (2001) Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control. Nature neuroscience 4: 819–825. doi: 10.1038/90526
[31]
Laughlin SB (2001) Energy as a constraint on the coding and processing of sensory information. Current opinion in neurobiology 11: 475–480. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00237-3
[32]
Daugman JG (1990) An information-theoretic view of analog representation in striate cortex. Computational neuroscience 2: 403–423.
[33]
Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ (1997) The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision research 37: 3327–3338. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00121-1
[34]
Lewicki MS (2002) Efficient coding of natural sounds. Nature neuroscience 5: 356–363. doi: 10.1038/nn831
[35]
He BJ (2011) Scale-free properties of the functional magnetic resonance imaging signal during rest and task. The Journal of neuroscience 31: 13786–13795. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2111-11.2011
