Objective This prospective study aims to identify and compare the incidence of bacterial contamination of hospital charts and the distribution of species responsible for chart contamination in different units of a tertiary hospital. Methods All beds in medical, surgical, pediatric, and obstetric-gynecologic general wards (556) and those in corresponding special units (125) including medical, surgical, pediatric intensive care units (ICUs), the obstetric tocolytic unit and delivery room were surveyed for possible chart contamination. The outer surfaces of included charts were sampled by one experienced investigator with sterile cotton swabs rinsed with normal saline. Results For general wards and special units, the overall sampling rates were 81.8% (455/556) and 85.6% (107/125) (p = 0.316); the incidence of chart contamination was 63.5% and 83.2%, respectively (p<0.001). Except for obstetric-gynecologic charts, the incidence was significantly higher in each and in all ICUs than in corresponding wards. Coagulase-negative staphylococci was the most common contaminant in general wards (40.0%) and special units (34.6%) (p>0.05). Special units had a significantly higher incidence of bacterial contamination due to Staphylococcus aureus (17.8%), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (9.3%), Streptococcus viridans (9.4%), Escherichia coli (11.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (7.5%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (7.5%). Logistic regression analysis revealed the incidence of chart contamination was 2- to 4-fold higher in special units than in general wards [odds ratios: 1.97–4.00]. Conclusions Noting that most hospital charts are contaminated, our study confirms that a hospital chart is not only a medical record but also an important source of potential infection. The plastic cover of the medical chart can harbor potential pathogens, thus acting as a vector of bacteria. Additionally, chart contamination is more common in ICUs. These findings highlight the importance of effective hand-washing before and after handling medical charts. However, managers and clinical staff should pay more attention to the issue and may consider some interventions.
References
[1]
World Health Organization (2009) WHO guidelines for hand hygiene in health care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
[2]
Ducel G, Fabry J, Nicolle LE, eds (2002) Prevention of hospital-acquired infections: a practical guide. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH/2002.12.
[3]
Pittet D, Boyce JM (2001) Hand hygiene and patient care: pursuing the Semmelweis legacy. Lancet Infect Dis 1: 9–20. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(09)70295-6
[4]
Allegranzi B, Pittet D (2009) The role of hand hygiene in healthcare-associated infection prevention. J Hosp Infect 73: 305–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.019
[5]
Sax H, Allegranzi B, Chra？ti MN, Boyce J, Larson E, et al. (2009) The World Health Organization hand hygiene observation method. Am J Infect Control 37: 827–834. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.07.003
[6]
Randle J, Arthur A, Vaughan N (2010) Twenty-four-hour observational study of hospital hand hygiene compliance. J Hosp Infect 76: 252–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.06.027
[7]
Scheithauer S, Haefner H, Schwanz T, Schulze-Steinen H, Schiefer J, et al. (2009) Compliance with hand hygiene on surgical, medical, and neurologic intensive care units: direct observation versus calculated disinfectant usage. Am J Infect Control 37: 835–841. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.005
[8]
Panhotra BR, Saxena AK, Ali Al-Arabi Al-Ghamdi AM (2004) The effect of a continuous educational program on hand washing compliance among healthcare workers in an intensive care unit. Br J Infect Control 5: 15–18. doi: 10.1177/14690446040050030401
[9]
Aragon D, Sole ML, Brown S (2005) Outcomes of an infection prevention project focusing on hand hygiene and isolation practices. AACN Clin Issues 16: 121–132. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200504000-00002
[10]
Pittet D, Panesar SS, Wilson K, Longtin Y, Morris T, et al. (2011) Involving the patient to ask about hospital hand hygiene: a National Patient Safety Agency feasibility study. J Hosp Infect 77: 299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.10.013
[11]
Dancer SJ (2004) How do we assess hospital cleaning? A proposal for microbiological standards for surface hygiene in hospitals. J Hosp Infect 56: 10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.09.017
[12]
Slekovec C, Gbaguidi-Haore H, Coignard B, Bertrand X, Talon D (2011) Relationship between prevalence of device-associated infections and alcohol-based hand-rub consumption: a multi-level approach. J Hosp Infect 2011 78: 133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.03.011
[13]
García-Vázquez E, Murcia-Payá J, Canteras M, Gómez J (2011) Influence of a hygiene promotion programme on infection control in an intensive-care unit. Clin Microbiol Infect 17: 894–900. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03391.x
[14]
Cohen SR, McCormack DJ, Youkhana A, Wall R (2003) Bacterial colonization of stethoscopes and the effect of cleaning. J Hosp Infect 55: 236–237. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00297-4
[15]
Loh W, Ng VV, Holton J (2000) Bacterial flora on the white coats of medical students. J Hosp Infect 45: 65–68. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0702
[16]
Bures S, Fishbain JT, Urehara CFT, Parker JM, Berg BW (2000) Computer keyboards and faucet handles as reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens in the intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 28: 465–470. doi: 10.1067/mic.2000.107267
[17]
Brady RR, Hunt AC, Visvanathan A, Rodrigues MA, Graham C, et al. (2011) Mobile phone technology and hospitalized patients: a cross-sectional surveillance study of bacterial colonization, and patient opinions and behaviours. Clin Microbiol Infect 17: 830–835. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03493.x
[18]
Tekereko？lu MS, Duman Y, Serinda？ A, Cu？lan SS, Kaysadu H, et al. (2011) Do mobile phones of patients, companions and visitors carry multidrug-resistant hospital pathogens? Am J Infect Control 39: 379–381. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.026
[19]
Halton K, Arora V, Singh V, Ghantoji SS, Shah DN, et al. (2011) Bacterial colonization on writing pens touched by healthcare professionals and hospitalized patients with and without cleaning the pen with alcohol-based hand sanitizing agent. Clin Microbiol Infect 17: 868–869. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03494.x
[20]
Panhotra BR, Saxena AK, Al-Mulhim AS (2005) Contamination of patients' files in intensive care units: an indication of strict handwashing after entering case notes. Am J Infect Control 33: 398–401. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.12.009
[21]
Bebbington A, Parkin I, James PA, Chichester LJ, Kubiak EM (2003) Patients' case-notes: look but don't touch. J Hosp Infect 55: 299–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.08.016
[22]
Hamza N, Bazoua G, Al-Shajerie Y, Kubiak E, James P, et al. (2007) A prospective study of the case-notes of MRSA-positive patients: a vehicle of MRSA spread. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89: 665–667. doi: 10.1308/003588407x205341
[23]
Alothman A, Jelani A, Althaqafi A, Rich M, Williams E (2003) Contamination of patient hospital charts by bacteria. J Hosp Infect 55: 304–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.08.003
Teng SO, Lee WS, Ou TY, Hsieh YC, Lee WC, et al. (2009) Bacterial contamination of patients' medical charts in a surgical ward and the intensive catre uni: impact on nosocomial infections. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 42: 86–91.
[26]
Zimbudzi1 E, Stuart RL, Korman TM, Kotsanas D (2011) Contamination of renal patients' hospital chart covers with vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Handle with care. Australas Med J 4: 538–541. doi: 10.4066/amj.2011.726
[27]
Jeans AR, Moore J, Nicol C, Bates C, Read RC (2010) Wristwatch use and hospital-acquired infection. J Hosp Infect 74: 16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.06.032
[28]
Huebner J, Goldmann DA (1999) Coagulase-negative staphylococci: role as pathogens. Annu Rev Med 50: 223–236. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.50.1.223
[29]
Tacconelli E (2011) When did the doctors become fomites? Clin Microbiol Infect 17: 794–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03499.x
