全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

Reading Direction and the Central Perceptual Span in Urdu and English

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088358

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background Normal reading relies on the reader making a series of saccadic eye movements along lines of text, separated by brief fixational pauses during which visual information is acquired from a region of text. In English and other alphabetic languages read from left to right, the region from which useful information is acquired during each fixational pause is generally reported to extend further to the right of each fixation than to the left. However, the asymmetry of the perceptual span for alphabetic languages read in the opposite direction (i.e., from right to left) has received much less attention. Accordingly, in order to more fully investigate the asymmetry in the perceptual span for these languages, the present research assessed the influence of reading direction on the perceptual span for bilingual readers of Urdu and English. Methods and Findings Text in Urdu and English was presented either entirely as normal or in a gaze-contingent moving-window paradigm in which a region of text was displayed as normal at the reader's point of fixation and text outside this region was obscured. The windows of normal text extended symmetrically 0.5° of visual angle to the left and right of fixation, or asymmetrically by increasing the size of each window to 1.5° or 2.5° to either the left or right of fixation. When participants read English, performance for the window conditions was superior when windows extended to the right. However, when reading Urdu, performance was superior when windows extended to the left, and was essentially the reverse of that observed for English. Conclusion These findings provide a novel indication that the perceptual span is modified by the language being read to produce an asymmetry in the direction of reading and show for the first time that such an asymmetry occurs for reading Urdu.

References

[1]  Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bul 124: 372–422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
[2]  Rayner K (2009) The Thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Q J Exp Psychol 62: 1457–1506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461
[3]  McConkie GW, Rayner K (1975) The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Percept Psychophys 17: 578–586. doi: 10.3758/bf03203972
[4]  McConkie GW, Rayner K (1976) Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. B Psychonomic Soc 8: 365–68. doi: 10.3758/bf03335168
[5]  Rayner K, Well AD, Pollatsek A (1980) Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Percept Psychophys 27: 537–544. doi: 10.3758/bf03198682
[6]  Rayner K, Well AD, Pollatsek A, Bertera JH (1982) The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Percept Psychophys 31: 537–550. doi: 10.3758/bf03204186
[7]  Underwood NR, McConkie GW (1985) Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading. Read Res Quart 20: 153–162.
[8]  Morrison RE, Rayner K (1981) Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle. Percept Psychophys 30: 395–396. doi: 10.3758/bf03206156
[9]  Miellet S, O'Donnell PJ, Sereno SC (2009) Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psych Sci 20: 721–728. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02364.x
[10]  Ikeda M, Saida S (1978) Span of recognition in reading. Vis Res 18: 83–88. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90080-9
[11]  Inhoff AW, Liu W (1998) The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. J Exp Psychol Human24: 20–34. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.20
[12]  Balota DA, Pollatsek A, Rayner K (1985) The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychol 17: ; 364–390.
[13]  Briihl D, Inhoff AW (1995) Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. J Exp Psychol Learn 21: 55–67. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.55
[14]  Lima SD, Inhoff AW (1985) Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter sequences. J Exp Psychol Human 11: 272–285. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.11.3.272
[15]  Rayner K (1975) The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychol 7: 65–81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
[16]  White S J, Rayner K, Liversedge SP (2005) The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading. Psychon Bull Rev 12: 466–71. doi: 10.3758/bf03193789
[17]  Williams CC, Perea M, Pollatsek A, Rayner K (2006) Previewing the neighborhood: The role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. J Exp Psychol Human 32: 1072–1082. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1072
[18]  Pollatsek A, Bolozky S, Well AD, Rayner K (1981) Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain Lang 14: 174–180. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(81)90073-0
[19]  Engbert Nuthmann, Richter E, Kliegl R (2005) SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychol Rev 112: 777–813. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.112.4.777
[20]  Reichle ED, Rayner K, Pollatsek A (2003) The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behav Brain Sci 26: 445–526. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x03000104
[21]  Jordan TR, Almabruk AAA, Gadalla EA, McGowan VA, White SJ, et al. (2013). Reading Direction and Central Perceptual Span: Evidence from Arabic and English. Psychon B Rev, in press
[22]  Mirdehghana M (2010) Persian, Urdu, and Pashto: A comparative orthographic analysis. Writing Systems Research 2: 9–23. doi: 10.1093/wsr/wsq005
[23]  H?iki? T, Bertram R, Hy?n? J, Niemi P (2009) Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. J Exp Child Psychol 102: 167–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.002
[24]  Gazzaniga MS (2000) Cerebral specialization and interhemipheric communication. Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain 123: 1293–1326. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.7.1293
[25]  Hellige JB (1993) Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[26]  Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC (1983) Hemispheric specialization: Return to a house divided. Behav Brain Sci 6: 528–533. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00073775
[27]  Chiarello C (1988) More on words, hemifields, and hemispheres: A reply to Schwartz and Kirsner. Brain Cognition 7: 394–401. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90014-0
[28]  Adamson MM, Hellige JB (2006) Hemispheric differences for identification of words and nonwords in Urdu-English bilinguals. Neuropsychol 20: 232–48. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.232
[29]  Almabruk AAA, Paterson KB, McGowan VA, Jordan TR (2011) Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: The evidence from Arabic. PLoS ONE 6(4): e18131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018131
[30]  Faust M, Kravetz S, Babkoff H (1993) Hemispheric specialization or reading habits: Evidence from lexical decision research with Hebrew words and sentences. Brain Lang 44: 254–263. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1017
[31]  Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z (2009) Language status and hemispheric involvement in reading: Evidence from trilingual Arabic speakers tested in Arabic, Hebrew, and English. Neuropsychol 23: 240–254. doi: 10.1037/a0014193
[32]  Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z (2012) The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages. Behav Brain Funct 8.
[33]  Koriat A (1985) Lateralization effects in reading pointed and unpointed Hebrew words. Brit J Psychol 76: 161–173. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01939.x
[34]  Eviatar Z, Ibrahim R, Ganayim D (2004) Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology 18: 174–184. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.174
[35]  Jordan TR, Paterson KB (2009) Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: A critical assessment of recent research. Neuropsychologia 47: 2341–2353. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.020
[36]  Jordan TR, Almabruk AAA, McGowan VA, Paterson KB (2011) Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: The evidence from Arabic. Cortex 42: 992–997. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.012
[37]  Jordan TR, Fuggetta G, Paterson KB, Kurtev S, Xu M (2011) An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition. PLoS ONE 6(9): e23957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023957
[38]  Apel JK, Henderson JM, Ferreira F (2012) Targeting regressions: Do readers pay attention to the left? Psychon B Rev 19: 1108–1113. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0291-1
[39]  Jordan TR, McGowan VA, Paterson KB (2012) What's left? An eye-movement study of the influence of interword spaces to the left of fixation during reading. Psychon B Rev 20: 551–557. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0372-1
[40]  Annett MA (1970) A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Brit J Psychol 61: 303–321. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01248.x
[41]  Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1980) The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Phys Opt 57: 378–387. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198006000-00011
[42]  Patching GR, Jordan TR (2005) Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers. Mem Cognition 33: 961–971. doi: 10.3758/bf03193205
[43]  Patching GR, Jordan TR (2005) Spatial frequency sensitivity differences between adults of good and poor reading ability. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 46: 2219–2224. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1247

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133