[1] | Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bul 124: 372–422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
|
[2] | Rayner K (2009) The Thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Q J Exp Psychol 62: 1457–1506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461
|
[3] | McConkie GW, Rayner K (1975) The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Percept Psychophys 17: 578–586. doi: 10.3758/bf03203972
|
[4] | McConkie GW, Rayner K (1976) Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. B Psychonomic Soc 8: 365–68. doi: 10.3758/bf03335168
|
[5] | Rayner K, Well AD, Pollatsek A (1980) Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Percept Psychophys 27: 537–544. doi: 10.3758/bf03198682
|
[6] | Rayner K, Well AD, Pollatsek A, Bertera JH (1982) The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Percept Psychophys 31: 537–550. doi: 10.3758/bf03204186
|
[7] | Underwood NR, McConkie GW (1985) Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading. Read Res Quart 20: 153–162.
|
[8] | Morrison RE, Rayner K (1981) Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle. Percept Psychophys 30: 395–396. doi: 10.3758/bf03206156
|
[9] | Miellet S, O'Donnell PJ, Sereno SC (2009) Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psych Sci 20: 721–728. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02364.x
|
[10] | Ikeda M, Saida S (1978) Span of recognition in reading. Vis Res 18: 83–88. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90080-9
|
[11] | Inhoff AW, Liu W (1998) The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. J Exp Psychol Human24: 20–34. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.20
|
[12] | Balota DA, Pollatsek A, Rayner K (1985) The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychol 17: ; 364–390.
|
[13] | Briihl D, Inhoff AW (1995) Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. J Exp Psychol Learn 21: 55–67. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.55
|
[14] | Lima SD, Inhoff AW (1985) Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter sequences. J Exp Psychol Human 11: 272–285. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.11.3.272
|
[15] | Rayner K (1975) The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychol 7: 65–81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
|
[16] | White S J, Rayner K, Liversedge SP (2005) The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading. Psychon Bull Rev 12: 466–71. doi: 10.3758/bf03193789
|
[17] | Williams CC, Perea M, Pollatsek A, Rayner K (2006) Previewing the neighborhood: The role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. J Exp Psychol Human 32: 1072–1082. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1072
|
[18] | Pollatsek A, Bolozky S, Well AD, Rayner K (1981) Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain Lang 14: 174–180. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(81)90073-0
|
[19] | Engbert Nuthmann, Richter E, Kliegl R (2005) SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychol Rev 112: 777–813. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.112.4.777
|
[20] | Reichle ED, Rayner K, Pollatsek A (2003) The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behav Brain Sci 26: 445–526. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x03000104
|
[21] | Jordan TR, Almabruk AAA, Gadalla EA, McGowan VA, White SJ, et al. (2013). Reading Direction and Central Perceptual Span: Evidence from Arabic and English. Psychon B Rev, in press
|
[22] | Mirdehghana M (2010) Persian, Urdu, and Pashto: A comparative orthographic analysis. Writing Systems Research 2: 9–23. doi: 10.1093/wsr/wsq005
|
[23] | H?iki? T, Bertram R, Hy?n? J, Niemi P (2009) Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. J Exp Child Psychol 102: 167–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.002
|
[24] | Gazzaniga MS (2000) Cerebral specialization and interhemipheric communication. Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain 123: 1293–1326. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.7.1293
|
[25] | Hellige JB (1993) Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
[26] | Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC (1983) Hemispheric specialization: Return to a house divided. Behav Brain Sci 6: 528–533. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00073775
|
[27] | Chiarello C (1988) More on words, hemifields, and hemispheres: A reply to Schwartz and Kirsner. Brain Cognition 7: 394–401. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90014-0
|
[28] | Adamson MM, Hellige JB (2006) Hemispheric differences for identification of words and nonwords in Urdu-English bilinguals. Neuropsychol 20: 232–48. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.232
|
[29] | Almabruk AAA, Paterson KB, McGowan VA, Jordan TR (2011) Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: The evidence from Arabic. PLoS ONE 6(4): e18131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018131
|
[30] | Faust M, Kravetz S, Babkoff H (1993) Hemispheric specialization or reading habits: Evidence from lexical decision research with Hebrew words and sentences. Brain Lang 44: 254–263. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1017
|
[31] | Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z (2009) Language status and hemispheric involvement in reading: Evidence from trilingual Arabic speakers tested in Arabic, Hebrew, and English. Neuropsychol 23: 240–254. doi: 10.1037/a0014193
|
[32] | Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z (2012) The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages. Behav Brain Funct 8.
|
[33] | Koriat A (1985) Lateralization effects in reading pointed and unpointed Hebrew words. Brit J Psychol 76: 161–173. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01939.x
|
[34] | Eviatar Z, Ibrahim R, Ganayim D (2004) Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology 18: 174–184. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.174
|
[35] | Jordan TR, Paterson KB (2009) Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: A critical assessment of recent research. Neuropsychologia 47: 2341–2353. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.020
|
[36] | Jordan TR, Almabruk AAA, McGowan VA, Paterson KB (2011) Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: The evidence from Arabic. Cortex 42: 992–997. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.012
|
[37] | Jordan TR, Fuggetta G, Paterson KB, Kurtev S, Xu M (2011) An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition. PLoS ONE 6(9): e23957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023957
|
[38] | Apel JK, Henderson JM, Ferreira F (2012) Targeting regressions: Do readers pay attention to the left? Psychon B Rev 19: 1108–1113. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0291-1
|
[39] | Jordan TR, McGowan VA, Paterson KB (2012) What's left? An eye-movement study of the influence of interword spaces to the left of fixation during reading. Psychon B Rev 20: 551–557. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0372-1
|
[40] | Annett MA (1970) A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Brit J Psychol 61: 303–321. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01248.x
|
[41] | Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1980) The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Phys Opt 57: 378–387. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198006000-00011
|
[42] | Patching GR, Jordan TR (2005) Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers. Mem Cognition 33: 961–971. doi: 10.3758/bf03193205
|
[43] | Patching GR, Jordan TR (2005) Spatial frequency sensitivity differences between adults of good and poor reading ability. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 46: 2219–2224. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1247
|